![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
| Tags: daw for remote, gigging or gagging, location recording |
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear interested Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 7
Thread Starter |
So in the search for what equipment i want to purchase for a prodution sound cart, i've been tickled by the idea of using a protools rig with a mac mini. I've seen carts using VOSGAMES' Boom Recorder, but havent seen one with Pro Tools. Ive been going over it in my head and can only think of more possiblities using a Pro tools rig vs anything else. Mainly the ease of the mixer at the cart adding comments on takes, and organizing the session betwen takes. Which would also make the transition into post more streamlined. not to mention non linear playback that you would experience with DAT. So having a very large track count at a pretty affordable price, while maintaining extreme versatility seems very desirable. im hoping someone can point out the things im missing, and why it would'nt work out like im hoping. Thanks! |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2003 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,323
|
I've seen them on carts, but Pro Tools LE has the issues of time code support. Boom Recorder does work with the interface so you could perhaps have the best of both worlds. When I have recorded to PTLE on location, I usually record a track of time code as an audio file to at least have a shot at sync. If you are talking HD, it is a completely different animal. PT HD is used with a certain regularity in the music/film world especially for playback. Notes can be left so that the mixers in post know what is going on. It is very convenient, actually... I think in the end, it depends on what the flow is for post including transfer/telecine and what makes the project move along. --Ben |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear interested Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 7
Thread Starter |
What if i were to convert the incoming LTC to MTC with a converter and using DV Toolkit? Im pretty sure LE can sync to MTC and DV toolkit will display it in SMPTE. theoretically Or is that what you are saying LE has a problem with? |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Gear nut Joined: Jun 2005 Location: Washington D.C.
Posts: 81
| Quote:
However, there is one solution that may work for proper, "continuous sync". Pro Tools LE, when used with any LE-compatible interface that has a s/pdif input, can sync its clock to that spdif input. So one scenario might be to: 1-Buy a device that could accept SMPTE audio and video blackburst, and then output a s/pdif signal synced to those sources (such as a MOTU digital timepiece, or one of the aardvark boxes) 2-Patch that spdif output into the LE rig's spdif input 3-Tell LE to sync its clock to that spdif input That should allow an LE rig to have proper, continuous re-sync to an incoming SMPTE/black burst feed. Regarding DV toolkit, funny thing, many versions ago, PT LE used to have a SMPTE display as a stock function, before you had to pay extra for it. I'm picturing a day at Digi HQ, way back when, where an excited product manager ran into his boss's office and said "I've got it! We'll make them pay a $100 fee for an upgrade that removes a major feature, and then charge them $1000 to buy it back!" You have to admire that type of capitalism
__________________ Dan Steinberg Pro Audio Product Manager http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielmsteinberg | |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Gear nut Joined: Jun 2005 Location: Washington D.C.
Posts: 81
| Quote:
Pro Tools M-powered works with some M-audio devices that have 32 inputs (like the M-audio lightbridge), but I think M-powered still gives it a software limit of 18. At any rate, M-powered can not be used with extras like the DV toolkit anyway, you need LE for that. | |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
I think something similar happened with some video functions as well.
__________________ "Everybody gets so much information all day long that they lose their common sense." - G. Stein 1946 The reputation of a thousand years may be determined by the conduct of one hour. - Japanese Proverb "Look into his face and hear the music of the ages. Don't pay too much attention to the sounds--for if you do, you may miss the music." - George Ives http://www.andersonsoundrecording.com | |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2003 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,323
|
Dan basically nailed it. Unless something has recently changed with LE, it basically is a free-run timecode sync. For short periods of time, you'll probably be fine. That being said, unless there is a secondary source of sync that is resolved to the code and whatever else is going on, for longer periods of sync, you will almost certainly drift. You also run into issues of time of day on set. Be prepared to use lots of offsets for time (not a big deal, but be ready for it) Boom Recorder is inexpensive and can use digi hardware. With it, you will also get a true timecode input- (any input can be used to capture code). Just a thought... --Ben |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Q-Sound for Pro Tools HD ? | steviesteve | High end | 2 | 3rd December 2008 04:21 PM |
| Pro Tools Sound? | Stixxs | So much gear, so little time! | 52 | 12th August 2008 03:11 PM |
| How to get this warm sound from Pro Tools | MC Blind | So much gear, so little time! | 55 | 3rd April 2008 11:13 PM |
| Pro Tools III NuBus system for location recording | Sonicmook56 | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 8 | 10th August 2006 03:56 AM |
| Annoying Pro Tools Sound | affinitysound | Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production | 4 | 17th March 2006 08:18 PM |
| |