Recording an Orchestra Rehearsal in a Small Room - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording


Tags: , , , , ,

Recording an Orchestra Rehearsal in a Small Room

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 7th March 2009   #1
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: West Hollywood, USA
Posts: 1,492

Thread Starter
Talking Recording an Orchestra Rehearsal in a Small Room

The other day I recorded a youth symphony rehearsal in a small room (classroom size, about 20' x 30') and the result was just awful. It lacked all sparkle and brilliance. I used a pair of modified MXL 990s in an ORTF configuration. The acoustics of the room were quite live to begin with -- linoleum tile floor, no treatment anywhere -- but became less live when people came in. There were tympani which sounded awful and the cellos sounded bad. It sounded like it was recorded in the 1940s with tube equipment and ribbon mics. Due to the size of the room there was no place to put the ORTF pair except behind the conductor and that put them in front of a row of cupboard doors, so I'm thinking reflections from these cupboard doors had an adverse effect.

There is no requirement that the recording be stereo -- monaural is perfectly fine as it is only a rehearsal. Any ideas? Close micing is not really an option. I've got a PZM mic on order and was going to experiment with affixing it to those cupboard doors and hopefully eliminate one source of reflection. Any other ideas?
chris319 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th March 2009   #2
Lives for gear
 
NorseHorse's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Location: DC
Posts: 2,095

Trial and error...

Hey Chris! Glad to have you. Would you like to post a sample of what the first recording sounded like? That might give us an idea of where to go from there.

Also, what are yours goals? Are you trying to make it more spacious?

Quote:
Originally Posted by chris319 View Post
It sounded like it was recorded in the 1940s with tube equipment and ribbon mics.
If you pretend you meant it, you might get a great reputation as the guy with that "vintage" sound!
__________________
http://www.facebook.com/ArtsLaureate
I-95, I-64, I-85
NorseHorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th March 2009   #3
Lives for gear
 
Corran's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Location: South Georgia
Posts: 2,929

Send a message via AIM to Corran
Yeah, a lot of people are looking for that sound...maybe you've got a winner!

Anyway, I've been recording rehearsals recently with a band I'm working with using their equipment. It's in a slightly larger room but has some similarities - for one we use ORTF right in front of the whiteboard so that might have some similar acoustic properties to the cabinets. Have you tried moving the mics up? We are blessed with good ceiling height - how is the ceiling in your room? I'd try getting the mics higher and then maybe facing them down towards the group, to get a little more "space" in a small room.

Once in a really bad room I had two mics facing each other about 30 feet apart, straddling the group. It actually sounded good (compared to the other options in that room at least). That might be another option to try.

I have been lucky to work in relatively okay rooms, nothings horrid like yours might be. This is all guesswork based on some of my observations, so take it with a grain of salt. Let us know what happens though.
__________________

www.oceanstarproductions.com
Corran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th March 2009   #4
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: West Hollywood, USA
Posts: 1,492

Thread Starter
Here is a link to a highly-compressed mp4 mono file of the entire rehearsal:

www.miclisteningroom.org/MSLMYSO/MSLMYSO_3-2-09.mp4

and a FLAC excerpt:

www.miclisteningroom.org/MSLMYSO/YSO.flac

It is a youth symphony orchestra, mostly high school age. The playing is what it is. The (non-tympani) percussionist was a professional musician and quite good. At about 23 minutes into the mp4 file there is a featured violinist who stood up and was playing a lot closer to my left-channel mic.

It sounds muddy to me overall. I want it to sound brighter, with more sparkle. I was using a new mixer which it occurs to me I should benchmark. I'll be surprised if there is a major problem with it. During the recording I was sitting stage right of the orchestra, monitoring on cans. Needless to say I did not get a look at the room until I showed up with my gear.
chris319 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th March 2009   #5
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: West Hollywood, USA
Posts: 1,492

Thread Starter
I have thought about hanging a single mic overhead (remember, it's OK if it's mono) but then I would have six reflective surfaces instead of five with the PZM, at least that's my thinking. OTOH if I used a cardioid there would be some attenuation of five of those surfaces (all except the floor) and I would even have some distance from the floor.

The ceiling is sloped, made of wood, and there are fluorescent light fixtures above. They are exposed fixtures, not the flush-mount false-ceiling type.

I have also thought about a cardioid on a low stand in front of the conductor, pointing up. With a sloped ceiling the sound is being reflected away from my mic, so I might want the most cancellation in the direction of the floor.

One luxury I have is that I can record two channels, one with the PZM and one with an alternate setup, for comparison.
chris319 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th March 2009   #6
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: West Hollywood, USA
Posts: 1,492

Thread Starter
No ideas?
chris319 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th March 2009   #7
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,960

I would hesitate to use PZM mic's in a small room due to the pronounced eigentones that terminates at the boundaries of the room.

Mission impossible I'd say! :-(


/Peter
Audiop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th March 2009   #8
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Location: Chestertown MD USA
Posts: 969

Hi Chris,
There is something very basic wrong with the recording. Have you used these mics before? What is your chain? Were you getting normal output from the mics?
__________________
Steve


mixedupsteve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th March 2009   #9
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: West Hollywood, USA
Posts: 1,492

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by mixedupsteve View Post
There is something very basic wrong with the recording. Have you used these mics before? What is your chain? Were you getting normal output from the mics?
This is my first experience ever recording music. Fortunately the stakes were low. I've used the 990s on speech before. The audio chain was MXL 990 to Peavey PV6 to Fostex FR-2LE.

Peavey.com :: PV Series

Welcome to Fostex USA

I hadn't used the Peavey before but at the last minute the conductor informed me there would be a soloist so I came prepared to spot mic a soloist with a third mic, which it turns out I didn't do).

I need to benchmark the Peavey.
chris319 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th March 2009   #10
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: West Hollywood, USA
Posts: 1,492

Thread Starter
OK, benchmarked the chain (sans mics) using RMAA. Other than about 1 dB rolloff at 20 kHz there were no surprises. THD was .0056%.

One of the two mics used can be heard here:

http://www.miclisteningroom.org/FLAC...0_Cap_Mod.flac
chris319 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th March 2009   #11
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Location: Chestertown MD USA
Posts: 969

Can you post a .wav or MP3?
mixedupsteve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th March 2009   #12
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: West Hollywood, USA
Posts: 1,492

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by mixedupsteve View Post
Can you post a .wav or MP3?
Here ya go:

http://www.miclisteningroom.org/MSLMYSO/YSO.wav

Do you have trouble playing back mp4 or FLAC? Winamp will do both.
chris319 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th March 2009   #13
Lives for gear
 
NorseHorse's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Location: DC
Posts: 2,095

Listening now...

Listen to the first general crescendo. There is a weird high metallic sound.

So I guess that comment doesn't help much, but maybe someone else will recognize it.
NorseHorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th March 2009   #14
Lives for gear
 
rumleymusic's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,554

I know what is wrong with it! It is a youth orchestra recorded in a tiny room.

There is nothing wrong with the recording equipment that I notice. Sure the mics could be a little higher up because all you hear is strings (angle is important when you are using a stereo pair on a large group), but that is what it will sound like when you record against a wall in a poor acoustic space. You can't expect a quality sound in under those conditions.
rumleymusic is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 8th March 2009   #15
Lives for gear
 
TheRealRoach's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,043

Quote:
Originally Posted by rumleymusic View Post
I know what is wrong with it! It is a youth orchestra recorded in a tiny room.
I agree. That's just what orchestra's sound like in rehearsal room. I rehearsed as part of an orchestra for many years in a rehearsal room very similar to the one you described and that's what it sounded like.

On a side note: I just did a recording a couple weeks ago in an 800 seat theatre, properly designed/treated. A close pair a few feet above the conductors head, ORTF, and an M/S setup in the middle of the seating, about 50' back. Killer!

The ORTF above conductors head should work really well. With any orchestral recording though you are totally dependent on the quality of the room. In the case of my gig a couple weeks ago it made my job REALLY easy.
TheRealRoach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th March 2009   #16
Lives for gear
 
NorseHorse's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Location: DC
Posts: 2,095

Quote:
Originally Posted by rumleymusic View Post
I know what is wrong with it! It is a youth orchestra recorded in a tiny room.
No, that is not the problem.

I've done a number of recordings with 990s in small rooms, including classrooms, and they don't sound like that AT ALL. MixedUpSteve is correct in saying there is something wrong with the chain. Power problems? Encoding problems? Damaged mics? 22kHz sample rate? I don't recognize the sound, but I'm hoping someone else will.
NorseHorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th March 2009   #17
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: West Hollywood, USA
Posts: 1,492

Thread Starter
Quote:
I've done a number of recordings with 990s in small rooms, including classrooms, and they don't sound like that AT ALL.
How were your 990s configued?

It was recorded at 44.1/24. Granted, having them in front of those cupboards doesn't help, but perhaps one or both of my 990s goes wacky at the high SPL the orchestra was playing at? This would be very difficult to track down being on cans in the same room as the orch. I have many other mics I could try.

It would sound more coherent if they were playing closer to the actual notes they were supposed to play, I'll give you that.

Quote:
Listening now...

Listen to the first general crescendo. There is a weird high metallic sound.
Were you listening to the mp4, the FLAC or the wav file?
chris319 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th March 2009   #18
Lives for gear
 
NorseHorse's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Location: DC
Posts: 2,095

.mp4 - didn't check the others.

All recordings below were with a pair of MXL 990s and a Tascam DP-01FX. Don't remember the configurations. These are meant as encouragement and also to demonstrate that there might be something wrong with the chain.
Attached Files
File Type: mp3 Alina Harway 11.MP3 (3.73 MB, 34 views)
File Type: mp3 Poppadom 01.MP3 (3.16 MB, 22 views)
File Type: mp3 Clarinet Recording_TEMP 02.MP3 (3.78 MB, 26 views)
NorseHorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th March 2009   #19
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: West Hollywood, USA
Posts: 1,492

Thread Starter
If there were something wrong with the chain, I would think it would show up in the RMAA frequency response curve.

How were the room acoustics in these recordings?

If you're listening to the mp4 you might be hearing compression artifacts. But it's still a bad recording. Give the FLAC a listen.

I assume your 990s have the stock ceramic capacitors and have not been modified?

Next time I might try an RE27 as an experiment.
chris319 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th March 2009   #20
Lives for gear
 
NorseHorse's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Location: DC
Posts: 2,095

Room is maybe 20 x 40. I was micing within 1-2 feet on the Alina Harway sample, clarinet sample, and five/six feet on the Poppadom. Reverb added in post.

Stock 990s.
NorseHorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th March 2009   #21
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: West Hollywood, USA
Posts: 1,492

Thread Starter
Quote:
Room is maybe 20 x 40.
Right, but how was it treated? Carpeting on the floor? What kind of walls and ceiling?
chris319 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th March 2009   #22
Lives for gear
 
NorseHorse's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Location: DC
Posts: 2,095

Carpeting mostly, padded seats. Nothing special about the walls/ceiling, untreated.

Your should be able to get much better results with your 990s and the Fostex, even if recording in a 15x15 box full of musicians. (Which I did once and the recording was used as a backing track for a musical at the NYC Fringe Festival. Sounded fine.) The producer has the recordings though; I was just donating my time / gear for the tracking portion.
NorseHorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th March 2009   #23
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: West Hollywood, USA
Posts: 1,492

Thread Starter
Carpeting and padded seats are more absorptive than linoleum tile and metal folding chairs. I still think I'm fighting room acoustics.
chris319 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th March 2009   #24
Lives for gear
 
NorseHorse's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Location: DC
Posts: 2,095

Yes, you are fighting room acoustics some, but that doesn't account for the "vintage" sound you described. Sorry I can't offer any more insight into the problem. Hopefully someone else will chime in.
NorseHorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th March 2009   #25
Lives for gear
 
rumleymusic's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,554

Oh come on, I doubt there is nothing wrong with the equipment.

Since the file is mono, that could explain a little of the "vintage" sound. If it was recorded in OTRF and then summed to mono that could explain a little of the "phaseyness".

Combine that with a bad room and you got yourself a bad recording.
rumleymusic is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 9th March 2009   #26
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: West Hollywood, USA
Posts: 1,492

Thread Starter
The right channel sounds just a bit better than the left, but it could just as easily be the result of acoustics as the functionality of the mic.
chris319 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th March 2009   #27
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: West Hollywood, USA
Posts: 1,492

Thread Starter
NorseHorse -

Here are instructions for replacing the ceramic capacitors in an MXL 990. If you are interested I'll dig up the part numbers for you. You can hear the difference by listening to the modded and unmodded mics here:

Mic Table

Gus' MXL 603s mod - Pictures/Part numbers -thanks Flatpicker
chris319 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th March 2009   #28
Lives for gear
 
NorseHorse's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Location: DC
Posts: 2,095

Quote:
Originally Posted by rumleymusic View Post
If it was recorded in OTRF and then summed to mono that could explain a little of the "phaseyness".
Good point.

Quote:
Originally Posted by chris319 View Post
Here are instructions for replacing the ceramic capacitors in an MXL 990.
Cool pictures. I sold my beloved 990s two weeks ago though... growing pains.
NorseHorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th March 2009   #29
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Location: Chestertown MD USA
Posts: 969

Quote:
Originally Posted by NorseHorse View Post
Room is maybe 20 x 40. I was micing within 1-2 feet on the Alina Harway sample, clarinet sample, and five/six feet on the Poppadom. Reverb added in post.

Stock 990s.
Where were the mics located on that close miced piano piece? I like it!
mixedupsteve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th March 2009   #30
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Location: Chestertown MD USA
Posts: 969

Quote:
Originally Posted by chris319 View Post
The right channel sounds just a bit better than the left, but it could just as easily be the result of acoustics as the functionality of the mic.
I haven't done the math but it would seem to me that OFTF in a small room like this would result in your mics pointing at the side walls. If so, you would get a lot of cancellation right at the mic location. The wave sounds better so I guess your mics are OK.
mixedupsteve is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
recording drums in a small room... PurpleGuitars Low End Theory 10 17th November 2011 03:11 PM
The recording studio/rehearsal room saga henryrobinett So much gear, so little time! 31 14th January 2009 03:14 AM
Recording band in a rehearsal room santibanks Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 1 17th May 2007 05:17 PM
Help Turning a studio room into rehearsal room. Pics included! Digamma So much gear, so little time! 4 9th November 2006 07:32 PM
Small String Orchestra Recording: suggestions? guerillamixer Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 20 4th July 2005 04:03 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:52 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.