![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
| Tags: daw for remote, mobile recording software |
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear Head Joined: Mar 2008 Location: UK
Posts: 48
Thread Starter |
I want to edit, mix down and master high quality (96k) acoustic audio tracks on the mac. What's the most effective, no frill, piece of pro software out there? Thank You Slutz! |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear interested | |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear |
Not so easy these days, unfortunately not so many third party people support Mac so choices become a little limited. Pro-tools, of course is the industry standard, but they have dropped the mastering tools and editing is basic. Logic Audio is favoured by many, but editing is clunky to say the least and for mastering it just isn't up to the job. You say accoustic music, are you talking classical? If that's the case I would suggest Sequioa (I believe that is available for mac) or possibly even better Pyramix running under bootcamp, both have good editing facilities and the ability to produce CD masters. Soundblade is also available for Mac, however this has limited track count and IMHO is lagging behind things like Pyramix, Sadie and Sequioa. If you can post a little more specific information as to what type of work you need it for, track counts, type of mastering I can help a little more. Regards Roland |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jan 2006 Location: Stockholm Sweden
Posts: 416
|
Sorry no Seqioa on Macs, Windows only. Otherwise a very good choice. Most of the functions are in the various flavours of Samplitude (same program, slightly different feature set. The source-destination feature in Sequioa has to be seen to be understood but can be worth the whole money). Could perhaps be run on Mac hardware running Windows but that is of course a different question. // Gunnar |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear Head Joined: Mar 2008 Location: UK
Posts: 48
Thread Starter | Clarification
Thank you all. Roland I am looking to edit and mix down up to 8 tracks to stereo. I make my recordings on a Nagra VI, which is an outstanding device with the highest quality sound. I'd like to edit down using an audio engine where I won't lose the hi-fi sound quality. The music ranges from ambient sounds with subtle acoustic instruments to a small folk/jazz roots quartet.
|
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2008 Location: Chestertown MD USA
Posts: 969
|
Logic Express is only $199.00 and it's great on Mac. For 8 channels you might even try Garage Band which comes free with Macs. |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2005
Posts: 798
| Quote:
SB supports all sample rates and the audio engine is known to be one of the best. Together with the Sonic 8-channel interface it avoids core audio. If you need more channels than I would prefer Pyramix over Sequoia. But up to 8 channels my choice would be Soundblade.
__________________ www.adebar-acoustics.de | |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 624
|
I think the Mac version of Reaper is still technically beta and still therefore free? You'd have to check their site to be sure. Certainly in its Windows incarnation it is a very capable multitrack audio post production environment, and can do stuff like three and four point edits if you string together the built in functions. The chances of any audio program with serious functionality being likely to noticeably degrade your audio of itself is close to zero. (If you use it incorrectly of course all bets are off!) |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2006 Location: Near Rome, Italy
Posts: 829
| |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Gear addict Joined: Nov 2007 Location: Bay area
Posts: 499
| Quote:
Greg | |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Lives for gear |
As I mentioned above, options are a little bit limited on Mac these days. For straight forward in the box mixing, Logic is good, but editing is pretty "pants". I myself have Pro Tools and Pyramix, but I am using both on PC. Running Sequioa or Pyramix native under bootcamp may be your best option, reaper if you can get it free might be worth a play with, but like anything often you get what you pay for. Good luck! Regards Roland |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Gear nut Joined: Nov 2008 Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 106
|
I would personally go with Pro Tools for editing on a Mac. It'll be more than adequate for what you need to do, although Logic is an equally good option to consider if you're ever likely to use the DAW for the more 'creative' side of music production. For added functionality, expanding the software by adding a controller for mixing is a good idea - maybe the 003 Factory for Pro Tools or the Euphonix Artist Series would be great for Logic. I know that's above and beyond what you've asked for, but they really do help with the whole mixing side of things. As for mastering, I guess it depends on which DAW you go for. Logic Studio comes with WaveBurner which will quite happily burn Red Book standard CD audio. If you go for Pro Tools, I always used to use BIAS Peak. Opinion will most likely be divided on that piece of software, but it never let me down and had a wealth of features! Mark
__________________ Audio Consultant Jigsaw Systems www.jigsaw24.com www.jigsawbroadcast.com mark.rickaby@jigsaw24.com Tel: (0870) 730-6804 |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Gear Head Joined: Jan 2007 Location: Manchester
Posts: 44
| |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Lives for gear | I am a little spoilt in that the editing (with it's fade editor) in Pyramix is extremely comprehensive and I can do quite silly things with it. With Logic it's a much more basic cut and paste operation, which for a lot of the jazz/classical/rock things I do isn't accurate or quick enough. As with so many things you have to decide what you need to achieve what you (and your clients) want. Basically thats why I am working on PC, as the programs I use are both available for this platform. I'm not for a second arguing one platform as against another, that's another personal choice, if the software I need for my work was only available on Mac I'd have a Mac. Obviously you will get a lot of differing advice from people depending on their personal preferences, I can only say that I operate as a comercial recording engineer and my tools are chosen on the basis of being able to do what my customers require me to do as quickly and efficiently as possible. YMMV Regards Roland |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Gear interested Joined: Feb 2009 Location: Colorado
Posts: 4
|
How about Audacity? The later versions (1.3 possibly still called beta) seem very usable in my very non-professional way.
|
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Audio Editing Software for Mac | Dystonaut | Music computers | 18 | 20th July 2009 11:19 PM |
| PC or MAC for Mastering/Editing Only | bloodstone | So much gear, so little time! | 18 | 30th December 2008 10:55 PM |
| What's the best software mastering package for Mac? | Wing Commander | So much gear, so little time! | 8 | 8th June 2006 01:54 PM |
| Your fave CD mastering software/Mac | Berolzheimer | So much gear, so little time! | 6 | 28th September 2005 08:27 PM |
| 2 Track Editor/Mastering Software for Mac | Dynodawg | Music computers | 9 | 27th October 2003 02:59 AM |
| |