![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
| Tags: advice observations enlightenment, business and such, classical |
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #31 |
| Gear addict |
A further link of interest... Gramophone - News - The world's best classical music magazine Especially the last paragraph Larry |
| | |
| | #32 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2008 Location: Earth
Posts: 3,587
|
The article is from Jan 27th...
|
| | |
| | #33 |
| Lives for gear |
What really suprises me is that Decca's main income over the last few years has been in repackaging it's archive, even in this economic climate it's catalogue is so extensive that it must have quite a lot of value, even as straight forward re-issues. I don't buy the colapsing and re-issuing under another label somehow getting them out of contractual obligations on old recordings. I would suspect that most recordings were paid for in the main with only prs and mechanicals (on a small number of their titles) being due, this would still be the case if these titles became available on a "phoenix" label and I would suspect that any artist that was due "royalties" would probably have a contract to protect their royalty should the recording be sold to or issued on another label. Regards Roland |
| | |
| | #34 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2008 Location: Earth
Posts: 3,587
|
You have a point, but I have given up trying to understand the maze of financial tricks and evasion schemes in the corporate world. After all we don't even know, maybe the brand survives and there just will be no more new productions? After all there MUST be a major reason, why well established and recognized brand names have been given up and back catalogs been reissued under new no name labels. |
| | |
| | #35 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2005 Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,034
|
Yep, Music Week states today that Decca is "to realign, not to close". Music Week - Universal: Decca to re-align but not to close Classical crossover artists are to be shifted to a different label on Universal. Apart from that, the article seems to suggest it's business as usual at Decca. Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #36 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 761
|
Once again, Lebrecht got it wrong! Always interesting reading, but appears to live in a parallel universe. I'm mildly annoyed at myself for having believed him. I should know better. Hrmph, 3rd&4thT
__________________ "Batteries Not Included." "Safe When Taken As Directed." "Available at All Fine Stores." "Check Our Website." "Ask Your Doctor." "Now on DVD." "Member FDIC." "Except in Nebraska." ---------------- Voiceover Tag Team |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sad News - Bo Diddley... | bcgood | So much gear, so little time! | 32 | 23rd July 2011 06:53 PM |
| Sad news...another great NYC area studio closes its doors... | jomo1234 | High end | 85 | 2nd February 2007 03:10 PM |
| A sad, sad christmas day..... | De chromium cob | The Moan Zone | 4 | 15th January 2007 12:52 AM |
| sad news for OSX | BevvyB | Music computers | 3 | 15th April 2003 07:21 PM |
| More Sad News | Jay Kahrs | So much gear, so little time! | 16 | 1st February 2003 04:49 AM |
| |