16 bit fostex ADAT recorder and octopre.. - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording

Tags: , , , , , ,

16 bit fostex ADAT recorder and octopre..
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 1st December 2008   #1
Gear addict
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 394

Thread Starter
Question 16 bit fostex ADAT recorder and octopre..

Hi slutz,

I may have made a bit of a boo-boo. I have owned an octopre LE ADAT for a while (perhaps a mistake in itself , but all i could afford at the time) which i use for recording drums in my living room.

I've started recording some classical concerts with a KM184 ORTF stereo pair going into a zoom H4. which sounds pretty good considering, and my clients have been happy and are asking me to record more. I saw the opportunity with my octopre and a dirt cheap fostex D90 to expand the possibilities to 8 channels where needed.

Now i'm pretty sure that octopre outputs 24bit adat and the fostex only takes in 16bit - will the wordlength be just truncated or will there be any element of dither or atleast rounding? Anyway to set the octopre to 16bit? Classical music is so dynamically sensitive I daren't use it for a conert.

Am I right to be concerned? Is there a cheap "24-16 dither box" to put inbetween my units? Is there another 8channel ADAT recorder around which can do 24 bits?

Also, what would you're "go-to" mic stand height be for an ORTF pair a couple of metres behind the conductor be? So many questions...

Oli
Oli_W is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2008   #2
Lives for gear
 
NorseHorse's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Location: DC
Posts: 2,160
My Recordings/Credits

No need to apoligize for the Octopre LE. According to Focusrite, the preamps actually distort less at higher gain than the regular Octopre preamps. It's mainly called "LE" because it has consumer-friendly outputs/inputs more suitable for home studios.

Sorry I can't enlighten the bit situation. Good luck!
__________________
Recording Engineer, Arts Laureate
I-95, I-64, I-85
NorseHorse is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2008   #3
Gear addict
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 394

Thread Starter
Looks like the normal Octopre can dither to 16bits, but not the LE

I'll have to do some tests and see how bad the 24-16 truncation sounds on quiet material.
Oli_W is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2008   #4
Lives for gear
 
d_fu's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,427

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oli_W View Post
I'll have to do some tests and see how bad the 24-16 truncation sounds on quiet material.
Don't worry, you won't hear it. Your "quiet material" is way above the converters' noise floor, and then there is also the ambient noise from the hall, which acts as a kind of "natural dither". I sometimes set my PC to record 16 bit only (no dither is applied during recording), and there is no audible problem due to truncation.

If the D-90 is too loud, you might want to read this.
d_fu is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2008   #5
Gear addict
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 394

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by d_fu View Post
Don't worry, you won't hear it. Your "quiet material" is way above the converters' noise floor, and then there is also the ambient noise from the hall, which acts as a kind of "natural dither". I sometimes set my PC to record 16 bit only (no dither is applied during recording), and there is no audible problem due to truncation.

If the D-90 is too loud, you might want to read this.
Thanks for the positive response!

i think recording to 16bit is different from truncating (as the 16bit conversion happens at the converters, not in the digital domain)...

Also, i've interpretted from bob katz's book that the audience noise floor acts differently from dither, as dither oscillates perfectly around the zero-crossing (average level of 0) and background noise doesn't... Could be wrong about that...
Oli_W is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2008   #6
Lives for gear
 
huub's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Location: amsterdam
Posts: 1,406
My Recordings/Credits

But the ambient noisefloor is soooo much higher than dither would be, for sure the effects of dither would be masked.
I do not think adding dither will make an audible difference in live recordings..

In broadcasting, the most common machine (sony digibeta) is 16 bits, and most engineers don't bother to dither their 24 bit mixer outputs, all live recordings have so much noise anyway, the truncation is inaudible..
huub is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2008   #7
Gear addict
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 394

Thread Starter
Woooo! thank you everyone
Oli_W is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
ADAT out now working with Octopre. SixAndChange Music Computers 2 13th October 2007 06:00 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:24 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.