So I just recorded John Cage's 4'33"... - Page 2 - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording


Tags: , ,

So I just recorded John Cage's 4'33"...

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 9th November 2010   #31
Lives for gear
 
Arthur Stone's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Location: Wales
Posts: 1,291

Send a message via ICQ to Arthur Stone
Exclamation Silence is Golden

JOHN CAGE'S 4'33'' FOR CHRISTMAS NUMBER ONE 2010

Cage Against the Machine

At last, some sanity...
Arthur Stone is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 9th November 2010   #32
Lives for gear
 
Yannick's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Location: Brussels
Posts: 595

I find this truly a great idea.

But it makes me wonder, what happens when we give a recording of 4'33" to a "good" mastering studio ? Very loud hiss/room noise at -0.2 dB ?



Anything beats Xmas songs all over the radio.
__________________
Yannick Willox
www.acousticrecordingservice.be
(mobile recording)
Yannick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th November 2010   #33
Lives for gear
 
PoxyMusic's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Location: The OC
Posts: 525

That's the problem with modern composers…their works are far too short.

Earthworks on 4"33" LOL. Talk about the wrong mics for the job!
__________________
www.steinbachsound.com
PoxyMusic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th November 2010   #34
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 624

There's a good item related to this on the BBC news site at BBC News - The power of silence considering many aspects of noise and silence in the modern world.
Ozpeter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th November 2010   #35
Lives for gear
 
PoxyMusic's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Location: The OC
Posts: 525

BTW us sound designers would love to get our grubby little hands on that recording. Crowd presence is a tough sound effect to come by.
PoxyMusic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th December 2010   #36
Lives for gear
 
Arthur Stone's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Location: Wales
Posts: 1,291

Send a message via ICQ to Arthur Stone
Ho Ho Shhh...

John Cage cover aims for Christmas No 1 with the sound of silence | Music | The Guardian
Arthur Stone is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 8th December 2010   #37
Gear addict
 
Studiodawg's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 362

When I recorded 4'33", I measured 4 minutes and 33 seconds back from when the pianist began to move just prior to clapping...ambient audience definitely makes the recordingthumbsup
Studiodawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th December 2010   #38
Lives for gear
 
klaukholm's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: EU
Posts: 2,431

With modern good quality pres, mics and ADs you should not have electronic noise problems. I have said many times that the earthworks mics are unsuitable for classical main rig duty due to noise.

By the way, those of you who classify Cage as contemporary, it is back to school time.
Cage is an ancient relic.
klaukholm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th December 2010   #39
Lives for gear
 
Corran's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Location: South Georgia
Posts: 2,929

Thread Starter
Send a message via AIM to Corran
Quote:
Originally Posted by klaukholm View Post
I have said many times that the earthworks mics are unsuitable for classical main rig duty due to noise.
Recording of "nothing" doesn't really bode well for ANY mic.

This thread is over 2 years old - I didn't have my Schoeps mics, and the EW's did a fabulous job for me many times.

I think the original point of this thread was that you can NOT have perfect electronic silence. I don't care if it's unnoticeable or not, there is inherent noise in every mic, preamp, etc., so regardless of the mic choice there is going to be something there. Nothing can capture the real concert-hall feeling of this piece (of course).

Anyway, I really think the dogging of EW mics on this forum is a little silly, especially when the DPA 4061 is praised almost universally and has the same inherent flaw.

/soapbox
__________________

www.oceanstarproductions.com
Corran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th December 2010   #40
Lives for gear
 
klaukholm's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: EU
Posts: 2,431

Well, I have also said many times that the 4061 is unsuitable for main rig duties.
I just recorded an orchestral piece from the mid 80s which has a large component of single instruments unaccompanied, dissapearing into silence. Several 5-15 second GPs. I beg to differ with your statement that you cannot be free of (audible) electronic noise. Electronic noise should not be noticeable in the main rig. If electronic noise is audible, you have a problem that needs to be solved.

I dare you to detect the noise level of an mkh80 going into a grace pre in a orchestra/concert hall setting.
klaukholm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th December 2010   #41
Lives for gear
 
Corran's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Location: South Georgia
Posts: 2,929

Thread Starter
Send a message via AIM to Corran
Quote:
Originally Posted by klaukholm View Post
I beg to differ with your statement that you cannot be free of (audible) electronic noise. Electronic noise should not be noticeable in the main rig.
I didn't say that. I said you cannot be free of self-noise of some sort, even if it is inaudible for all intents and purposes (and frankly, that depends on your listening volume...).

I'm talking hypotheticals here...
Corran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th December 2010   #42
Lives for gear
 
klaukholm's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: EU
Posts: 2,431

I disagree, it is my opinion that one should always choose a main rig that has a self noise level below that of the room when recording sensitive soft material.
For that job the 4061 and the EW are the wrong tools.

Another hint, when recording 4.33, you are recording the audience, not the pianist, as the audience is the performer in this piece. The piece is not about silence at all, rather the reaction and dynamic of an audience in face of this (originally surprising) turn of events.
It is no longer surprising as we all know the piece, but there is still an audience dynamic.

It would have been interesting to have a archival recording of the premiere, just as it would be nice to be a fly on the wall in Paris for the Sacre premiere.
klaukholm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th December 2010   #43
Lives for gear
 
Corran's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Location: South Georgia
Posts: 2,929

Thread Starter
Send a message via AIM to Corran
Quote:
Originally Posted by klaukholm View Post
Another hint, when recording 4.33, you are recording the audience, not the pianist, as the audience is the performer in this piece. The piece is not about silence at all, rather the reaction and dynamic of an audience in face of this (originally surprising) turn of events.
It is no longer surprising as we all know the piece, but there is still an audience dynamic.
Yes, I quite know this.

When I posted this thread I had just recorded an encore for a recital. I had no idea it was happening.
Corran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th December 2010   #44
soulstudios
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arthur Stone View Post
JOHN CAGE'S 4'33'' FOR CHRISTMAS NUMBER ONE 2010

Cage Against the Machine

At last, some sanity...
I wonder what kind of dither they used for the final recording...
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th December 2010   #45
Lives for gear
 
Boschen's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,072

Quote:
Originally Posted by Corran View Post
and I realized no matter how good the equipment is and how low the noise figures are, there will never be a live recording of 4'33" that isn't contaminated by electrical noise of some sort.

That's kind of a let down, isn't it?

Anyone else happen to have the opportunity to record this piece? This was the encore to a new music recital. Any special ways you went about it?
Couldn't resist this thread; brings up so many interesting points.
Which is more important, the performance, or the composition?

If John Cage falls over in a wood, will anyone hear it?
Why bother recording such a work in the first place, arguably an abstract or experimental piece that's actually divorced from the performing musicians themselves?

Why couldn't you simply parse out 4'33 of an empty file in a DAW? Then you could control the noise floor and such. Otherwise, you'll get 4'33 of chair squeaks, coughing, and butts shifting on wood chairs, followed by awkward applause. Is that what Cage would have been after?
Boschen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th December 2010   #46
Lives for gear
 
jchadstopherhuez's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Location: usa
Posts: 1,957

Quote:
Originally Posted by Corran View Post
and I realized no matter how good the equipment is and how low the noise figures are, there will never be a live recording of 4'33" that isn't contaminated by electrical noise of some sort.

That's kind of a let down, isn't it?

Anyone else happen to have the opportunity to record this piece? This was the encore to a new music recital. Any special ways you went about it?

i've recorded a few performances of 4'33''...the last one got squashed in mastering.

i can barely listen to it anymore.

you kids and your volume wars and loud...uh, music.

best,

jchristopherhughes
jchadstopherhuez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th December 2010   #47
Lives for gear
 
Arthur Stone's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Location: Wales
Posts: 1,291

Send a message via ICQ to Arthur Stone
Silence has real power - any event that includes silence is a testament to that, particularly mass events. Silence is also a tool of the oppressor, and the meditator.

There's also a Gestalt perspective where the silence, normally the ground, becomes the figure...very subversive.
Arthur Stone is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12th December 2010   #48
Lives for gear
 
joelpatterson's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: Albany, New York
Posts: 9,509

There's also the perspective: "This is idiotic bullshit."
joelpatterson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th December 2010   #49
Super Moderator
 
Remoteness's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,405

Joel, you know you're my hero, right?
Remoteness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th December 2010   #50
Lives for gear
 
joelpatterson's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: Albany, New York
Posts: 9,509

Cool, Steve! You've chosen your heroes wisely...
joelpatterson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th December 2010   #51
Lives for gear
 
Arthur Stone's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Location: Wales
Posts: 1,291

Send a message via ICQ to Arthur Stone
Quote:
Originally Posted by joelpatterson View Post
There's also the perspective: "This is idiotic bullshit."
Funnily enough Joel, that was my initial impression.
Arthur Stone is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 13th December 2010   #52
Lives for gear
 
joelpatterson's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: Albany, New York
Posts: 9,509

And a natural, possibly universal reaction, I'm guessing...

So-- I for one should know that living on the cutting edge and coming up with innovations that turn things on their head is going to be greeted with skepticism, generally-- and the little nugget of brilliant insight that your innovation embodies may struggle to find acceptance-- and the judgment you're looking for is way, way down the line-- you're gambling that trends will prove you "right," or at least "clever"...

And, in the end, who knows. This all reminds me of the time I was paused at a stoplight, and there was a guy on the streetcorner who was most probably totally insane-- blabbering a mile a minute, kind of free associating-- coherent, for the most part, but arguing with the thin air. And it was almost fascinating-- trying to follow his logic, marveling at the sheer perversity and pathos of it all... in the moment before the light changed, I thought, "put this guy on a stage, charge admission, this is 'entertainment' of a whole new order."

Could have been the birth of something-- but then the damn light turned green!
__________________
Mountaintop Studios
~the peak of perfection~
Petersburgh NY 12138

mountaintop@taconic.net

www.joelpatterson.us
joelpatterson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th December 2010   #53
Lives for gear
 
Arthur Stone's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Location: Wales
Posts: 1,291

Send a message via ICQ to Arthur Stone
YouTube - X Factor 4, The Final, Leon Wins! (itv.com/xfactor)

YouTube - John Cage "4'33"
Arthur Stone is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2010   #54
Gear maniac
 
Sheikyearbouti's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: London
Posts: 286

Talking

I will buy it today. If the whole UK gets 5 minutes of silence on Radio 1 it would be very symbolic (as it was when RATM sung in Finsbury Park "Turn on the radio, nah f**k it turn it off... Shut down the devil sound"). dfegad
__________________
Nikolay Georgiev
www.georgievsound.com
Sheikyearbouti is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
4'33" in a high school? Ken Walker Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 10 18th October 2008 03:16 AM
This is badly recorded but..... warmer Work In Progress / Advice Requested / Show & Tell / Artist Showcase / Mix-Offs 12 16th May 2007 07:13 PM
Tracks being recorded Paul762 Music computers 2 12th December 2006 01:30 AM
help with recorded lectures hiphopdraw Mastering forum 1 4th October 2006 07:47 PM
A band I recorded Zeppelin4Life Work In Progress / Advice Requested / Show & Tell / Artist Showcase / Mix-Offs 2 29th May 2006 03:28 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:58 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.