![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
| Tags: gigging or gagging, location recording, speaker |
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear |
I was thinking that maybe, to save cost and have less gear to lug around, that I could invest in a single, really nice, monitor. This way, I can get a better idea of how good the tone of say, the guitar is, without having to setup a stereo pair of speakers that I have to carry around. With just one, I would hear a pretty accurate version of what I am recording, instead of guessing like I have had to do with headphones.. What say you?
__________________ //Hawk Duncan [2.66Ghz i7 MacBook Pro, 8GB, Logic 9, ProFire2626] |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2008 Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Posts: 5,288
|
I take a pair of K+H O110D monitors with me in a custom padded bag for easy transportation.
__________________ John Willett Sound-Link ProAudio Ltd. Circle Sound Services President - Fédération Internationale des Chasseurs de Sons (and lots more - please look at my Profile) |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2005 Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,033
|
Interesting idea. One of the big advantages of monitors over headphones is being able to impress the client by letting them hear some playback... which would be hard with just one. The other issue is that instruments that we're used to hearing panned centre in a pair of speakers tend to sound entirely different when reproduced by a single speaker. So you may find yourself applying too much eq or playing with mic positioning more than you need to, in an effort to get it to "sound right". Just a thought. I don't have much problem carrying two speakers around, but then mine are small and easy to deal with. I'm all for anything that reduces my setup/teardown time (though you wouldn't think so if you saw the amount of junk I take to a gig). |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear |
Thanks Paul, the idea was mostly to double my monitor budget while making teardown faster, basically.
|
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2006 Location: Germany
Posts: 2,420
| Quote:
Plenty of bass, I might even consider lowering the 100Hz range a bit on location. Nice spaciousness, too. Pleasant, yet detailed. Unbeatable at the price, but I'd still think they sound good if the price was higher. They are great fun on electronic music, too (stuff on iTunes radio). Here's a review. Daniel | |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear |
Like I said, I am more interested in one, single, high quality speaker instead of two. I will be recording on location and then retiring to my home studio for mixing purposes where I have acoustic treatment and a proper listening setup. So for no other reason than having less to carry around with me, one speaker would be beneficial, but the biggest advantage is that, if I have a $1000.00 budget, I can put all of that money into one speaker versus splitting it and getting the quality of a 2 $500.00 speakers... see what I mean? I am really asking if anyone sees any flaws in my idea... Many people recommend mixing in Mono anyways- and this would be as true mono as you can get! |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 561
|
Heck, if I only cared about mono, I'd just monitor on headphones. The reason I lug two speakers out on location is because I need to be able to check the stereo imaging. For that, headphones just don't cut it. David L. Rick Seventh String Recording |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Lives for gear |
Haha, why would you use stereo headphones to listen to something in mono??? The single speaker is the best/most accurate/truest way to listen to mono, because that's exactly what it is.. Again- the reason for a single speaker is to have the benefits of a pair of high quality, flat, reference monitors but half the price (since only getting one) The important part is hearing the proper tone, headphones dont represent the spectrum as well and as flat as reference monitors, from my research... |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Super Moderator Joined: Aug 2002 Location: NYC
Posts: 7,405
|
As long as I'm not mixing, and only tracking I have used a single monitor with great success. It's positioned similar to how a typical monitor engineer would set it up.
__________________ Steve Remote AuraSonicLtd.com the home of ASL Mobile & Location Production Remoteness on the Linkedin Network What about my Facebook Profile? Remoteness on Myspace |
| | |
| | #12 | |
| Gear maniac Joined: Dec 2002 Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 275
| Quote:
My traveling speakers are the same as my studio speakers. This keeps my ears from getting confused. | |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Lives for gear |
So I'm not crazy and this is an actual technique that other people use! Sweeeet...
|
| | |
| | #14 | |
| Super Moderator Joined: Aug 2002 Location: NYC
Posts: 7,405
| Quote:
When recording via our portable rigs I usually bring a pair of speakers, but I have done the single monitor routine plenty of times. It works well as a way to monitor the input source while tracking. | |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Monitor speakers for location recording vehicles... | Remoteness | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 82 | 30th June 2010 06:22 AM |
| Tell us about your last location recording... | Remoteness | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 33 | 1st May 2009 01:57 PM |
| Recording location in Phoenix, AZ? | bove | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 1 | 11th April 2007 04:37 PM |
| Recording location in LA? | mds | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 8 | 9th April 2007 07:21 AM |
| Location recording on a budget | mahoobley | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 27 | 7th January 2007 03:10 PM |
| |