Distributing sync via wireless? - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording


Tags: , , ,

Distributing sync via wireless?

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 26th June 2008   #1
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 24

Thread Starter
Question Distributing sync via wireless?

I've got what probably is bad solution to an otherwise trivial
problem. I'm recording production audio for a long outdoor
event (3+hours) with multiple recorders spread out over
hundreds of meters of space. I really would like to hold all
of the recorders to within 5ms sync using some sort of word
clock distribution method.

The catch is, I need to do it without wires as the space
between the recorders is uncontrolled and any cables or
fiber I lay is likely to be rolled over by a tractor or messed
with by someone.

What would happen if I fed my master video black into a small
video transmitter on a pole and then put UHF TV receivers at
all the recording locations. If the output of the TV receivers were
then fed to an Aardsync or equivalent, would that give me a
distributed wordclock within my 5ms requirement?

Other than laying miles of mic cable, is there a right way to attack
this problem?

-Dustin
[The person with weird problems]
Dustin Moore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th June 2008   #2
Gear Head
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 70

Dustin, I would suggest renting as many Ambient Clockit units as you need. These units will output TC and wordclock. Very stable.

David
drpro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th June 2008   #3
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 24

Thread Starter
If only my cheap prosumer video gear would take the genlock in.

I was hoping to drive everything off my primary video camera being
fed through a genlock-cleaner-upper. My video gear drifts about
0.3% relative to my 702 and in three hours that accumulates to
a decent bit of time. This is probably another case of "you can't
get that without decent gear".


If I owned my own engineering firm I'd figure out how to make something
like a lockit that uses GPS as the main timebase and then has
a 900Mhz transceiver to communicate with the other "Ubber-lockits".

The idea would be that there would be one Ubber-lockit taking
sync from video black and that it would calculate the difference in
frequency and phase between the genlock and the GPS timebase.
It would then transmit this freq/phase update to all the Ubber-lockits
in realtime so that everything would stay in sync.

Probably cost more than getting decent equipment or digging some trenches, though.
Dustin Moore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th June 2008   #4
Gear Head
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 70

I understand. I primarily do location sound and when mixing fullsize cameras with the smaller nonTC ones, what we do sometimes is sync the Lockit boxes to the master whether its one of the fullsize cameras that has TC and genlock or another source such as your SD recorder. Then feed one channel of the smaller cameras the TC output of the Lockit box. Post if they are using Avid can read the LTC track from the small camera. There are a couple of programs on the market that allow FCP to do the same. If you are fortunate to be using one of the newer Canon HD XL cameras they have TC + genlock.

David
drpro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th June 2008   #5
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 745

What you don't say is what gear you currently have and what budget you have.

A GPS conditioned txco frequency reference can be had new for about $1000 and they are on eBay for $2-300 Trimble Thunderbolt or Jackson Fury. Both have stupidly accurate and stable clock outputs (actually better than rubidium atomic clocks) and are very small 12 volt powered systems - only needed a cheap external GPS antenna. But they only output a 10MHz signal. (And 1 pulse per second.) So you would need a clock generator that can derive a useful clock from that. The trouble with that is that it is too trivial - and you can't easily buy one - although you could make one for a few dollars. You don't need - or indeed even want - a frequency synthesising divider - all your converters need to be on exactly the same frequency. A simple divide by 208 would get you so close to 48kHz it doesn't matter. And with one of these frequency standards you would be within one microsecond for weeks. So - you could actually do it for not a lot of money, or for a lot of money.
__________________
The night is coming, and its filled with dark surprise.
Francis Vaughan is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Protools HD, Sync I/O, Big Ben and House Sync !? kwilliams Post Production forum! 8 11th June 2008 12:54 PM
9 Pin Host sync cable for Digidesign SYNC? razorz Low End Theory 3 6th November 2007 02:53 PM
sync to blackburst vs sync to word clock numrologst Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 33 3rd February 2007 12:05 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:23 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.