Reasons to Maintain Mono-Compatibility - Page 3 - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording


Tags: , , , ,

Reasons to Maintain Mono-Compatibility

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 5th April 2011   #61
Lives for gear
 
boojum's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2007
Location: Astoria, OR, US&A
Posts: 2,308

Thank you. Great music; great album. OK, I am closer than I thought to what you guys are talking about. I am not there. Thanks so much for the examples. I downloaded them and ran them through foobar and did the "downmix to mono" and breathed a sigh of relief.
__________________
Nov schmoz ka pop.
boojum is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Educate me on Mono Compatibility.. Teddy Ray Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 12 17th May 2009 07:34 AM
wall of guitars - mono compatibility...? gitarrero So much gear, so little time! 14 20th August 2007 07:41 PM
Mono compatibility for film question Post Production forum! 7 8th August 2007 04:50 AM
ORTF mono compatibility Dr Funk Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 10 14th February 2006 08:23 PM
Keyboards and mono-compatibility Stephen B. So much gear, so little time! 8 26th May 2005 03:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:21 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.