Vocal micing in Herbie Hancock: Possibilities - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording


Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Vocal micing in Herbie Hancock: Possibilities

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 13th May 2008   #1
Lives for gear
 
Clueless's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 1,706

Thread Starter
Talking Vocal micing in Herbie Hancock: Possibilities

A bunch of us got together last night to watch Herbie Hancock's Possibilities DVD, a collaboration to produce new music with a variety of contemporary artists--Chrstina Aguilera, Annie Lennox, Sting, Joss Stone, John Mayer, etc. There's a lot of footage of the studio sessions and it seemed to be different studios for each track, so lots of exposure to the similarities and difference between the studios and their approaches/abilities.

One question we all discussed afterwards related to the vocal micing technique. Virtually all the singers had two mics in their booth, usually either a Telefunken 251 or a U87 or a U47 and some other tasty mic. We are all familiar with the technique of having a close-up mic and another mic 5' back in the room to pick up ambience, but that setup was only in evidence once. What we saw and could not explain was the incredible variability of placement of the second mic. With Annie Lennox is was right next to the primary mic. With others it was 2' back, 3' back, down, up, etc. Our question was--what would drive this variety?

My hypothesis is that not all booths are created equal, and that in many cases the mics are pushed around more by what the room acoustics dictate than by what serves the singer. I.e., many booths don't have a spot 5' from the singer's primary sweet spot that's worth capturing. Any thoughts on (1) the two-mic technique, and (2) what factors influence how one implements that approach in the booths that vocalists sing in.
Clueless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th May 2008   #2
JGP
Gear Head
 
JGP's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 57

How do you know both mics were being recorded??
JGP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th May 2008   #3
Lives for gear
 
Clueless's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 1,706

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by JGP View Post
How do you know both mics were being recorded??
For the sake of this discussion, and because of the fact that using multiple mics to record a single source is a well-established technique, let's stipulate that they are. What I understand (rightly or wrongly) is that a mic positioned 5' away from a source in a properly sized room (doesn't need to be 1380 sq ft) provides a source for natural ambiance to balance out the sound of a close-up mic.
Clueless is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Info on Herbie Hancock albums Headhunters, Thrust etc. mizzle Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 18 28th November 2011 10:48 PM
Herbie Hancock Lights It Up At Newport Remoteness Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 25 10th November 2008 08:32 PM
Herbie Hancock - Possiblities. You NEED to see this. Herman Munster Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 13 26th February 2008 02:41 AM
Herbie Hancock and Quincy Jones playing with toys in the studio! PhonoquO Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production 15 11th January 2007 05:37 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:15 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.