Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording

Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording Jazz, Classical, Choir, Acoustic Music environments & beyond + Live Performance, Mobile & Location Production & Broadcasting Moderated by Steve Remote of Aura Sonic Ltd. NYC, NY USA

Tags: , ,

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 13th May 2008, 07:27 AM   #1
wellyouneednt
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlantic Canada
Posts: 17
Talking Schoeps MK21 caps in the studio...

Hello,

I make very frequent use of my pair of Schoeps CMC6 MK41 mics in my room. I'm recording mostly acoustic instruments (strings, winds, percussion, acc. guitar) for soundtrack sweetening work. I love the depth/subtlety of the mids of the MK41 caps and their ability to 'isolate' the source in a natural way...very advantageous for post, and the source pans beautifully.

I am interested in hearing from MK21 users that are using the capsule for studio capture at close/medium distance (15-60 inches or so). I'm wondering if the MK21 would work well for instruments that require a bit more bass extension and/or 'bloom'.

Also...the MK41 has a very musical/useful proximity effect allowing you to work the mic placement...how much proximity effect does the MK21 have and how musical/useful is it?

I have a nice sounding treated room (mix of wood, glass, baffles, diffusers) so the room isn't necessarily a problem...I just don't want too much of it.

Due to my location, I don't have the option to experiment and return. The MK21 would be a special order item for me, so experienced opinion would be highly valued.

Much appreciated...
wellyouneednt
wellyouneednt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th May 2008, 11:43 AM   #2
John Willett
Lives for gear
 
John Willett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Posts: 625
Smile

I have not used the MK21 but is has a reputation for being a fine mic.

It is an omni and omnis have no proximity effect at all!

An omni is a pure pressure microphone and does not rely on sound entering rear ports to get a directional response - the sound will be the same at 1mm and 1m and 10m etc. - no bass tip-up at all. That's what is so good about them.
__________________
John
President - Fédération Internationale des Chasseurs de Sons
John Willett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th May 2008, 12:14 PM   #3
Royer121
Gear nut
 
Royer121's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 134
Actually this is not correct. The MK21 has the characteristic of a wide cardioid and has some proximity effect. Its a mix between a pressure microphone and a gradient microphone, defined as 1/3 gradient and 2/3 pressure...a supercardioid is defined 63,5 % gradient and 36,5 % pressure.

Read here for more information:
SCHOEPS wide-cardioids

The MK21 has a wide range of use cases... :) I've seen it used as a close mic for piano, as a main mic for orchestra and also for voice.. ;)


greets
ray
__________________
"The more gear you buy, the more money you need to buy more gear..."
Royer121 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th May 2008, 12:18 PM   #4
ISedlacek
Lives for gear
 
ISedlacek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Czech mountains and forests
Posts: 2,642
Send a message via ICQ to ISedlacek
My experience: I have MK21 here but I end using MK2 in 99% of cases (recording acoustic instruments in my studio). I had MK41 here as well but did not like them much - a bit "constrained", tensed sound to my ears ... rather "shotgun" it seems.
__________________
Ivo
Velvet Mastering
Savita Music
ISedlacek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th May 2008, 12:43 PM   #5
John Willett
Lives for gear
 
John Willett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Posts: 625
Red face

Quote:
Originally Posted by Royer121 View Post
Actually this is not correct. The MK21 has the characteristic of a wide cardioid and has some proximity effect. Its a mix between a pressure microphone and a gradient microphone, defined as 1/3 gradient and 2/3 pressure...a supercardioid is defined 63,5 % gradient and 36,5 % pressure.

Read here for more information:
SCHOEPS wide-cardioids

The MK21 has a wide range of use cases... :) I've seen it used as a close mic for piano, as a main mic for orchestra and also for voice.. ;)
Oops - sorry - should have checked the brochure before posting.

I'm so used to everything starting with a "2" being omni.
__________________
John
President - Fédération Internationale des Chasseurs de Sons
John Willett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th May 2008, 01:35 PM   #6
Roland
Lives for gear
 
Roland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: St Leonards on Sea, England
Posts: 1,228
The Mk21 is a great microphone, I used three yesterday for spotting a choir at the Royal Festival Hall in London. Great mic's, really smooth, perfect for what I was doing. I would suspect that in a studio environment that the benefits would be less, in my situation I needed some degree of rear rejection, but with a wider pick-up than a normal cardiod would have afforded me. For increased bass performance and smoothness I would, (like others here have suggested) use the Mk2 Omni.

Regards


Roland
Roland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th May 2008, 01:49 PM   #7
mosrite
Lives for gear
 
mosrite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Scotland
Posts: 815
The MK21 is a wonderful capsule BUT your room had better be up to scratch.
mosrite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th May 2008, 03:02 AM   #8
wellyouneednt
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlantic Canada
Posts: 17
Thanks for the reponses.

I am aware the the MK21 is a wide cardiod and thought the pattern might be a bit more useful in the studio.

So the MK21 is not as smooth as the MK2?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ISedlacek View Post
My experience: I have MK21 here but I end using MK2 in 99% of cases (recording acoustic instruments in my studio).
Ivo, is it the pattern you find advantageous or is there a quality in the sound you prefer? I have read some of your other posts and I know you like an omni spaced pair...this can be awkward for me because for what i do, mono compatibilty is still quite important (for better or worse).

Cheers,
wellyouneednt
wellyouneednt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th May 2008, 03:26 AM   #9
Jason West
Gear nut
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Dallas, TX (USA)
Posts: 108
Quote:
Originally Posted by wellyouneednt View Post
I am aware the the MK21 is a wide cardiod and thought the pattern might be a bit more useful in the studio.

So the MK21 is not as smooth as the MK2?
I did acoustic guitar recordings that compare the stereo sets of MK2,MK21, and MK41. When I recorded the tests, I ran all 6 mics simultaneously so I could use the same performance as a baseline. It was very educational to hear the differences between the caps. Unfortunately, I'm migrating web servers so the sounds files are not available for download at the moment.

For what it's worth, I prefer the MK2/MK21 over the MK41 for natural acoustic guitar. I prefer MK21 whether it's AB spacing or ORTF. The only time the MK41 sounds better is when I use it in XY configuration. But I hardly ever record in XY (too narrow a stereo image for solo guitar) so the MK41 doesn't come out often for that.

I now use the MK41 as a hihat mic on the drumset.
Jason West is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th May 2008, 03:30 AM   #10
bove
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 172
Quote:
Originally Posted by wellyouneednt View Post
is it the pattern you find advantageous or is there a quality in the sound you prefer?
As compared to the MK2, the MK21 has a slight emphasis in the high frequencies. I use both, depending on what sounds best. The rear isolation can come in handy as well. In addition to the usual wide NOS ORTF, the MK21 is also quite nice as an AB pair, providing a bit of rear exclusion.
bove is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 14th May 2008, 05:25 PM   #11
achabloop5080
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 10
May I ask for the technical specifications of this wide NOS/ORTF setup with MK21s?
(Capsules distance, angle, height and direction).....
Could this technique be used also in classical grand piano recording with good results?

Thank you
__________________
Gianluca Piacenza

http://www.gianlucapiacenza.it
achabloop5080 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th May 2008, 11:32 PM   #12
Ken K
Gear Head
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by bove View Post
As compared to the MK2, the MK21 has a slight emphasis in the high frequencies. I use both, depending on what sounds best. The rear isolation can come in handy as well. In addition to the usual wide NOS ORTF, the MK21 is also quite nice as an AB pair, providing a bit of rear exclusion.
How wide is your spacing when you use the mk21s as an AB pair?

Thanks,

Ken K
Ken K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th May 2008, 05:37 AM   #13
bove
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 172
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken K View Post
How wide is your spacing when you use the mk21s as an AB pair?

Thanks,

Ken K
In that situation, I'd position the MK21 at exactly the same width as if it were an MK2.
bove is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 17th May 2008, 09:42 AM   #14
wuwei
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by bove View Post
In that situation, I'd position the MK21 at exactly the same width as if it were an MK2.
Try 41 cm wide as an angle, that works good if your monitor has been set up in a correct way!
wuwei is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0