![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
| Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording Jazz, Classical, Choir, Acoustic Music environments & beyond + Live Performance, Mobile & Location Production & Broadcasting Moderated by Steve Remote of Aura Sonic Ltd. NYC, NY USA |
| Tags: acoustic instrument, gigging or gagging, mikage |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Atlantic Canada
Posts: 17
| Hello, I make very frequent use of my pair of Schoeps CMC6 MK41 mics in my room. I'm recording mostly acoustic instruments (strings, winds, percussion, acc. guitar) for soundtrack sweetening work. I love the depth/subtlety of the mids of the MK41 caps and their ability to 'isolate' the source in a natural way...very advantageous for post, and the source pans beautifully. I am interested in hearing from MK21 users that are using the capsule for studio capture at close/medium distance (15-60 inches or so). I'm wondering if the MK21 would work well for instruments that require a bit more bass extension and/or 'bloom'. Also...the MK41 has a very musical/useful proximity effect allowing you to work the mic placement...how much proximity effect does the MK21 have and how musical/useful is it? I have a nice sounding treated room (mix of wood, glass, baffles, diffusers) so the room isn't necessarily a problem...I just don't want too much of it. Due to my location, I don't have the option to experiment and return. The MK21 would be a special order item for me, so experienced opinion would be highly valued. Much appreciated... wellyouneednt |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Posts: 625
| I have not used the MK21 but is has a reputation for being a fine mic. It is an omni and omnis have no proximity effect at all! An omni is a pure pressure microphone and does not rely on sound entering rear ports to get a directional response - the sound will be the same at 1mm and 1m and 10m etc. - no bass tip-up at all. That's what is so good about them. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Germany
Posts: 134
| Actually this is not correct. The MK21 has the characteristic of a wide cardioid and has some proximity effect. Its a mix between a pressure microphone and a gradient microphone, defined as 1/3 gradient and 2/3 pressure...a supercardioid is defined 63,5 % gradient and 36,5 % pressure. Read here for more information: SCHOEPS wide-cardioids The MK21 has a wide range of use cases... :) I've seen it used as a close mic for piano, as a main mic for orchestra and also for voice.. ;) greets ray
__________________ "The more gear you buy, the more money you need to buy more gear..." |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear | My experience: I have MK21 here but I end using MK2 in 99% of cases (recording acoustic instruments in my studio). I had MK41 here as well but did not like them much - a bit "constrained", tensed sound to my ears ... rather "shotgun" it seems. |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Posts: 625
| Quote:
I'm so used to everything starting with a "2" being omni. ![]() | |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: St Leonards on Sea, England
Posts: 1,228
| The Mk21 is a great microphone, I used three yesterday for spotting a choir at the Royal Festival Hall in London. Great mic's, really smooth, perfect for what I was doing. I would suspect that in a studio environment that the benefits would be less, in my situation I needed some degree of rear rejection, but with a wider pick-up than a normal cardiod would have afforded me. For increased bass performance and smoothness I would, (like others here have suggested) use the Mk2 Omni. Regards Roland |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Scotland
Posts: 815
| The MK21 is a wonderful capsule BUT your room had better be up to scratch. |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| Gear interested Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Atlantic Canada
Posts: 17
| Thanks for the reponses. I am aware the the MK21 is a wide cardiod and thought the pattern might be a bit more useful in the studio. So the MK21 is not as smooth as the MK2? Quote:
Cheers, wellyouneednt | |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Gear nut Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Dallas, TX (USA)
Posts: 108
| Quote:
For what it's worth, I prefer the MK2/MK21 over the MK41 for natural acoustic guitar. I prefer MK21 whether it's AB spacing or ORTF. The only time the MK41 sounds better is when I use it in XY configuration. But I hardly ever record in XY (too narrow a stereo image for solo guitar) so the MK41 doesn't come out often for that. I now use the MK41 as a hihat mic on the drumset. | |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: New York, NY
Posts: 172
| As compared to the MK2, the MK21 has a slight emphasis in the high frequencies. I use both, depending on what sounds best. The rear isolation can come in handy as well. In addition to the usual wide NOS ORTF, the MK21 is also quite nice as an AB pair, providing a bit of rear exclusion. |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 10
| May I ask for the technical specifications of this wide NOS/ORTF setup with MK21s? (Capsules distance, angle, height and direction)..... Could this technique be used also in classical grand piano recording with good results? Thank you |
| | |
| | #12 | |
| Gear Head Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 56
| Quote:
Thanks, Ken K | |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: New York, NY
Posts: 172
| |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 11
| |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |