tape noise at beginnings/endings of tracks - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording


Tags: , , ,

tape noise at beginnings/endings of tracks

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 8th May 2008   #1
Lives for gear
 
danijel's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
Posts: 1,732

Thread Starter
Question tape noise at beginnings/endings of tracks

i am doing a compact cassette transfer for a CD re-release.
i gently suppressed some noise, but, of course, there's lots left in.

how should i treat the noise at beginnings/endings of tracks? instinct tells me to leave 2 seconds of pure noise before the first track, and to fade it out with the last reverb tail, but there is probably some norm on this issue?
oh, it's a classical guitar recording.

thank you!
danijel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th May 2008   #2
Lives for gear
 
peeder's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: No longer participating here.
Posts: 6,705

I would prefer a clean entry, trim to signal with very fast fade-in. Fading out on a sustain is OK. But when I hear noise first of all, I think, "this is going to be disappointing."
peeder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th May 2008   #3
Han
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 983

Adobe Audiotion (Cool Edit Pro) has a very good hiss remover.
Han is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th May 2008   #4
Gear addict
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Location: Jackson, TN
Posts: 310

Depending on the first part of the musical performance a fast fade in will not work. It depends on the signal to noise ratio. For example, if the beginning is quiet then a fast fade will pummel the listener with noise that is louder than the first note. This would obviously emphasize the noise over the music.

Typically, at least in pro level classical recordings made with very low noise, common practice is to fade the audio in such a way that allows the room to open up without being noticed before the music begins. This is desirable because you want true digital silence between tracks on a CD and a fast fade would be very noticeable (even for ambient room noise picked up by the many different open mics). Again this is dependent on the attack of the very first note. A strong fast attack will accept a short fade where a slow or soft attack will not.

If it is a soft attack I would fade the noise in so that once it is noticeable the music begins. This would direct the listeners attention away from the noise and to the music where it belongs. Most non-audio types will not notice noise unless it is just god awful and drowning out or competing with the music. In that case you should retrack if possible, or get more aggressive with your noise reduction.

If you post a clip of the first part of the song (without noise reduction), I'm sure that we could help you out with how to approach this.
__________________
Matt Snyder
15" MBP 2Ghz Core 2 Duo 6GB RAM, 2 320GB LaCie Quadra Drives, MOTU 828mk3, Logic 9 on SL 10.6

"There is no such thing as an old song, just bad ones."
tms8707056 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th May 2008   #5
Gear maniac
 
springer's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 293

I find that using CoolEditpro to remove any signal right up to the first note makes my mixes sound much more professional.
- Zoom into the area
- Select the area (right up to the first note beginning)
- Transform->Amplitude->Amplify->cut->OK

If there is noise in the recording the human brain doesn't notice it as much WITH music as without... That's why it sounds great when you take out the noise when there is silence.

Good luck!
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th May 2008   #6
Lives for gear
 
danijel's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
Posts: 1,732

Thread Starter
thanks everyone!
you're (all) right about introducing noise along with first note's attack, if it's percussive and loud enough. fortunately, these were spanish songs, so they all start pretty straight except one where i took out some more noise from the first couple of notes, so the noise comes in gradually.
mission accomplished!
danijel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th May 2008   #7
hrn
Lives for gear
 
hrn's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: Gävle, Sweden
Posts: 586

First of all be sure that you have a cassette player of high class transfering it. At least you have to clean the heads and demagnitize it. Also, be sure that the heads are in the right position.

Think about the option to remaster it in the computer. Probably some EQ-ing and soft limiting can make wonders. I have done it myself.

Hans
__________________
*R1b M343 Cro-Magnon
*U5a Sami
hrn is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Running your tracks through a tape machine, minus the tape??? Marshall Oliver So much gear, so little time! 16 13th March 2008 09:35 AM
Help! Lot of noise/hiss in guitar tracks! JMWS So much gear, so little time! 0 1st November 2007 03:07 PM
very loud noise on audio tracks vigge Electronic Music Instruments & Electronic Music Production 5 3rd September 2007 12:06 AM
Help! Trying to Diagnose Ramdom Bursts of White Noise on HD Tracks gsmelley Music computers 3 7th April 2007 10:26 PM
Using tape recorders to warm up tracks w/o recording into tape Farshad So much gear, so little time! 2 12th June 2006 04:49 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:14 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.