![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
| Tags: advice observations enlightenment, broadcast, daw for remote, location recording, mixing by remotesters, mobile recording software, technique |
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear nut Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 126
Thread Starter |
I do mainly live recording and broadcast. Up to this point, we've generally recorded multis onto a HD24xr and Digital Performer, as well as doing the live 2-mix with a small mixer. However, if I want to go back and re-mix (usually in ProTools), we have to spend the time setting up the session. This is really inefficient, if we're just fixing a couple of things. It occurred to me that it might be possible to use the mixer in a DAW to do the mix; and if we could record the automation at the same time, setup for a re-mix would be virtually nonexistent. Yes, I realize the huge can of worms this opens up from a reliability standpoint. But it seems as though no DAW allows actual recording of automation while it is recording audio. Am I missing something here? And of course, I need the rig to be as small as possible, with 24 channels. Thanks. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,851
|
I've never tried that, but if it's true that your DAW won't reocrd audio and automation at the same time you could make a dummy track next to every real track and record automation on IT, then just slide the audio onto the automated track. Messy, but workarounds usually are.
__________________ Danny Gold |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear nut Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 126
Thread Starter |
Yeah, using Aux tracks and copying afterwards does seem as though it'll work, but it's messy for sure. It's just strange to me that the major DAWs don't allow this. Thanks for the idea! |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear interested Joined: May 2006 Location: SF, CA
Posts: 24
|
I've never tried it, but doesn't Sequoia support this? aaron |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2005 Location: amsterdam
Posts: 1,208
|
Well, with protools and a venue or icon, or merging pyramix with a ramses, you can do exactly this.. but it's costly! Any Daw that can do realtime mixing with a controller should do the trick really.. and you don't need to record automation, you just have to make snapshots after every song.. |
| | |
| | #6 | ||
| Gear nut Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 126
Thread Starter | Quote:
Quote:
thanks again, I'm going to check out sequoia/samplitude... | ||
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2005 Location: amsterdam
Posts: 1,208
|
Just checked pyramix, you can both write automation and make snapshots during recording.. You can connect a mackie control to pyramix (you would needthe native version, pyramix with pyramix dsp is a lot of cash) but you need to purchase a remote control and an enhanced midi key.
|
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2005 Location: amsterdam
Posts: 1,208
|
Oh, actually logic also does this no problem, and is easily capable of 128 samples latency with some interfaces, it also works with a mackie control or euphonix mc mix right out of the box.. You just set automation to latch or write or whatever and hit record.. |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Gear addict Joined: Mar 2006 Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 370
|
I do it several times a week using Nuendo. This rig is an f-ing powerhouse. It is essentially an HP core duo Laptop using an RME digiface fed by Apogee AD16x with a Mini DAC for monitoring. I use the frontier controller but hope to get a mackie universal controller or Euphonics if they become available for windows. It has been extremely reliable! I have recorded up to 130 tracks just to see if it would do it. It did 26 recorded tracks at a time while all other tracks were playing while only hitting 16% CPU usage. This was with a very fragmented HD which was spiking at 40% but still had no hiccups. I have never even come close to pushing it even running several IR verbs and many other plugs. I also run an analog 2 mix as well from my ATI's to a separate Soundevices 722 just in case but knock on wood have never needed it. I always also run two live simultaneous reference CD's for the clients from the Nuendo mixer. I have also controlled Nuendo hundreds of times using a O2R96 which integrates extremely well with each other. Simultaneously recording automation is never an issue, even while recording many tracks. By the way, my computer is two years old at this point, I am sure they are much faster by now, but I don't really feel the need to upgrade I have been so content. I will be switching to Sequoia once I find the time to buckle down and read its beastly manual. Best! Cameron Last edited by roonsbane; 7th May 2008 at 12:30 AM.. Reason: forgot something |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Gear nut Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 126
Thread Starter | Quote:
Also, can you share why you're switching to Sequoia? I know very little about it, other than its fabled crossfade abilities. I'd likely be using a MacBook Pro and possibly the Euphonix McMix controllers. | |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Gear addict Joined: Mar 2006 Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 370
|
Hey Bixby, All you do is click the "W" for Write key on the track you want to write automation on. This can be done while recording a first pass. I am fairly certain PT will do it as well though I have never actually done it live. Though I have never tried that specifically of course I do also use PT at work when I have no other choice. I am switching to Sequoia exactly for the fabled crossfade editor. I prefer Nuendo any day over PT for many reasons. Mostly the sonics. If you don't need the crossfade editor for classical style editing then Nuendo is great and I love wavelab as well. I haven't appreciated Steinbergs responses to well known bugs specific to this kind of editing. They won't even say if they consider it a priority or give any kind of estimate as to when or if it might be fixed. Since folks doing classical style editing are the only people that care Steinberg seems to have made fixing these a very low priority. Plus all of plug in processing I have used so far using Sequoia has really really sounded great! The onboard EQ is by far the closest thing I have found to using an analog EQ with practically non of the usual strange artifacts. With Sequoia I think it's safe to say from their high end mastering users that it has top sonics, and being able to take a project all the way from multitrack to CD within one program is amazing. Plus you get Nuendo like high speed bouncing and the crossfade editor without the bug that nuendo includes. My two cents. I hope this helps. Cameron |
| | |
| | #12 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2004 Location: southeast
Posts: 1,393
| Quote:
Rich | |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Gear addict Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 447
|
You can automate while recording in Ableton Live, as well. So it's just Pro Tools where this isn't possible? |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Gear nut Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 126
Thread Starter |
I can confirm this is not possible with PT LE - once you record-enable a track, the automation options become grayed-out. Can anyone confirm this with HD as well? Thanks again. |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Gear addict Joined: Feb 2005 Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 391
|
I've written automation while recording audio on the SADiE workstation. The best part of SADiE's automation is the data is written to the soundfile.. If you move the soundfile, the automation data goes with it. .
__________________ With Best Regards, Michael Bishop Learn why Everything's Better in 5/4! http://Recording.Pro |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 162
|
I like Michael have done this on Sadie - in fact I did it today on a webcast of a college choir in Cambridge whereby the results get posted within hours of the recording. Recording automation live means most of it is fine with just the occasional tweak required before doing a no real time bounce to MP3. I have the LRX so there is a tactile control surface right there and the laptop just sits on top. I am so relieved Sadie got bought by Prism because this system is perfect for what I do and I would have hated it not to have been supported. Matt Dilley |
| | |
| | #17 | |
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| Quote:
m@ | |
|
| | #18 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2002 Location: El Lay
Posts: 2,209
| Quote:
running the tracks through auxes & automating them is certainly a work around, & you don't have to copy the automation, you could just leave it that way. But it would use up a lot of your busses & DSP and besides, it just shouldn't be necessary.
__________________ Purveyor of fine sounds since 1961. My very incomplete IMDB list: My very incomplete IMDB list I'm all ears. | |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Gear nut Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 126
Thread Starter |
Well, that's just one more push away from PT! Thanks to everyone for their input. Glad to know others are successfully doing this. |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Gear addict Joined: Feb 2005 Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 391
| Last edited by MBishopSFX; 9th May 2008 at 03:52 PM.. Reason: web link added |
| | |
| | #21 | |
| Gear addict Joined: Nov 2007 Location: Bay area
Posts: 499
| Quote:
various automation modes possible during recording/playback, or manually. I run Samp. on an Alienware laptop with an older RME Multiface I Greg | |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Jan 2006 Location: Hills of Vermont
Posts: 171
|
DP will record automation at the same time as audio. I just tried it!
|
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Noob PT/DAW question - writing automation during recording | Bixby | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 20 | 23rd June 2011 10:03 AM |
| Kore and Protools not recording automation | passionmax | So much gear, so little time! | 3 | 3rd July 2008 06:18 PM |
| Recording Mute Automation for Hardware Synths in Logic? | teknosmoker | Electronic Music Instruments & Electronic Music Production | 3 | 13th August 2007 06:28 PM |
| Board Automation vs. DAW Automation | jb_studio | High end | 8 | 9th May 2005 11:21 PM |
| DAW automation with Analog Consoles | jkasko | So much gear, so little time! | 13 | 23rd November 2002 09:09 AM |
| |