rme fireface for classical music - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording


Tags: , , , ,

rme fireface for classical music

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 5th March 2008   #1
Gear maniac
 
fafalio's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Location: italy
Posts: 159

Thread Starter
Send a message via MSN to fafalio Send a message via Skype™ to fafalio
Question rme fireface for classical music

dear friends
i d like to know if RME fireface would be good for classical recordings.
i need neutral converters. i want to buy an audio card to connect to my mac book pro.
sometimes it is said that fireface converters are metalic/coloured for classical recording.
what do you think about this?
thanks Alessandro.
fafalio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2008   #2
Lives for gear
 
John Willett's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Posts: 5,288

Smile

I do classical recording and I have the RME Fireface 400.

But I have only used the D/A part as I actually record onto a Fostex FR-2 via the Audio & Design DMA-2.

For classical, if you can't afford the Prism Orpheus, I would say that the FF400 is the next best thing. Which is why I got it.
__________________
John Willett
Sound-Link ProAudio Ltd.
Circle Sound Services

President - Fédération Internationale des Chasseurs de Sons

(and lots more - please look at my Profile)
John Willett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2008   #3
Gear addict
 
Mats H's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 469

Send a message via MSN to Mats H
Quote:
Originally Posted by fafalio View Post
dear friends
i d like to know if RME fireface would be good for classical recordings.
i need neutral converters. i want to buy an audio card to connect to my mac book pro.
sometimes it is said that fireface converters are metalic/coloured for classical recording.
what do you think about this?
thanks Alessandro.
Hi Alessandro!

My 2 cents: The Fireface 800 is good for recording most things. As most pieces of audio equipment, it performs within it's price range. More expensive converters will sound better, but for what it does, it does it very well. It sounds transparent, though not as smooooth as Lavry Blues, which is one of the few converters I've compared it to.

The D/A is not always entirely pleasant to listen to, a wee clinical and hard upper mid range and very articulate. It perhaps accentuates the upper mids a bit, but if you get it to sound good, listening to the FF800, it should sound really good on better converters. Others have pointed out that the A/D section is actually quite good, comparable to Apogee's Rosetta 800 converter.

I've recorded choirs, symphony orchestras, smaller ensembles, bands, a lot of individual musicians and a bunch of concerts since 2005 and it has never let med down. Totally reliable. Just don't unplug the Firewire cable while recording . I've used it live on a musical as 6 channel strips for FOH, while recording 16 channels of audio simultanously without a glitch. I've used it as a FOH mixer in other situations. I rely on the FF800 as a soundcard, even if I sometimes use other converters for better sound. I bought a Lake People F44 A/D converter recently, which sound better. But for what the Fireface does, it's a very good value, a very flexible soundcard. Perhaps the most flexible there is.
Mats H is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2008   #4
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,323

Also take a look at the SK48, I am using it for classical recording at 96k.
StudioKonnekt 48
David Spearritt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2008   #5
Gear addict
 
Larry Elliott's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: Auckland , New Zealand
Posts: 325

Send a message via AIM to Larry Elliott Send a message via Skype™ to Larry Elliott
David
How do you find the TC Software - there seems to be a few gripes about it. I demoed one of the earlier units in the range and was not too impressed with the software.

Alessandro

Currently I am using a FF400 on my PC rig for choral and small orchestras and I think it represents good value for the price.

Larry
Larry Elliott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th March 2008   #6
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,323

Hi Larry, the TC software is one of the main reasons I sold the Lynx Aurora and bought the SK48. The software mixer is an ergonomic masterpiece, so much more usable than the Lynx mixer.

I have found the software drivers to be unconditonally stable with recording, multitrack at 96kHz, no problem. I have some issues when trying to use the Fabrik plugs in a third party host, ie Wavelab. TC are still working on this. The sound quality is superb.
David Spearritt is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
What are the REAL advantages of the RME Fireface 800 over the RME Multiface II HeatWAVS Music computers 26 18th February 2009 06:09 PM
2 RME fireface 800s or 1 Fireface and 1 ADI-8? Bluemoa So much gear, so little time! 2 12th August 2007 08:54 AM
RME Fireface 400 vs. Fireface 800 heksu High end 10 23rd August 2006 02:42 PM
RME Fireface 800 (RME does/outdoes MOTU) MattiMattMatt So much gear, so little time! 3 19th April 2004 04:56 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:48 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.