3rd March 2008
|
#1 | | Gear interested
Joined: Jan 2008 Location: Glos, UK
Posts: 19
Thread Starter | Recording strings, any mic suggestions?
Hi, Any suggestions on mic's for recording Cello and Violin?
|
| |
3rd March 2008
|
#2 | | Gear Guru
Joined: Nov 2005 Location: S.Carolina
Posts: 12,238
|
I have always liked the u87 on strings.
|
| |
3rd March 2008
|
#3 | | Gear Head
Joined: Sep 2007 Location: Paris
Posts: 60
|
Hi,
personally: Schoeps 221, U67, Km84...
and sometimes, ribbon.
|
| |
3rd March 2008
|
#4 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Nov 2006 Location: East Coast USA | Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeancab Hi,
personally: Schoeps 221, U67, Km84...
and sometimes, ribbon. | +1 thumbsup KM84
|
| |
3rd March 2008
|
#5 | | member no 666
Joined: Jun 2002 Location: Suffern, NY
Posts: 10,412
|
I really like the Royer SF-1 for strings... and while I haven't had a whole lot of opportunity to do strings with our KM-69 yet... it has shown through very nicely. It has the "silk" of a KM-84 with a tad more 'air' which originally gave me cause for pause [bow noise] but worked out surprisingly well.
Peace.
__________________ CN Fletcher Professional Affiliation: R/E/P Professional Recording Engineer and Producer forums mwagener wrote on Sat, 11 September 2004 14:33
We are selling emotions, there are no emotions in a grid Roscoe Ambel once said:
Pro-Tools is to audio what fluorescent is to light |
| |
3rd March 2008
|
#6 | | Gear nut
Joined: Aug 2005 Location: Los Angeles, USA
Posts: 101
|
Earthworks QTC-1, Schoeps CMC6 with MK2H caps & DPA 4006s are the clean, hi-fi mics of choice for me. Royer 122s are also quite nice.
If ya wanna go a bit more old school, then a pair of Coles 4038s in blumlein works very well too (good enough for the beatles)
All the best,
Bent
|
| |
3rd March 2008
|
#7 | | Gear interested
Joined: Jan 2008 Location: Glos, UK
Posts: 19
Thread Starter | Quote:
Originally Posted by bent sounds Earthworks QTC-1, Schoeps CMC6 with MK2H caps & DPA 4006s are the clean, hi-fi mics of choice for me. Royer 122s are also quite nice.
If ya wanna go a bit more old school, then a pair of Coles 4038s in blumlein works very well too (good enough for the beatles)
All the best,
Bent |
Coles was a cool suggestion! Haven't tought about taking that route on the production which will actually work really well! cheers for that advice mate |
| |
3rd March 2008
|
#8 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Feb 2008 Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Posts: 6,749
|
I would use MKH 40 or the new MKH 8040 or an MS pair of MKH 30/.40.
|
| |
3rd March 2008
|
#9 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Jan 2005 Location: NYC
Posts: 642
|
While I really like using ribbons on violin, I'm not a fan of any I've tried on cello. Using ribbons as a main pair on an orchestra makes some sense to me (its usually a strong, dark coloration in my experience but a pleasing one) but on a solo cello it is often too dull / muddy sounding to me (without serious HF boost EQ).
In other words if you are talking about a single violin and a single cello (or a small section) in a studio I'd definitely recommend different mics for each. Ribbons for violin and a large diaphragm condenser (U67, Brauner, U47) for cello.
If its 'au naturale' classical orchestral you are recording its a different beast.
Hope this helps,
Silas
|
| |
3rd March 2008
|
#10 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Jan 2004 Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,048
|
My favorites on violins are either the KM64, KM264 ac701k tube mics, or a royer SF-1, SF12(need more gain)
Cello, I have found that the KM84 works very well.
Ollie |
| |
3rd March 2008
|
#11 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 994
| MKH Quote:
Originally Posted by John Willett I would use MKH 40 or the new MKH 8040 or an MS pair of MKH 30/.40. | What differences do you hear between your 8040s and 40's on cello and violin-or strings in general?
|
| |
3rd March 2008
|
#12 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,299
|
77 / tube pre.
|
| |
3rd March 2008
|
#13 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Feb 2008 Location: Burbank, California
Posts: 1,566
| Quote:
Originally Posted by bent sounds ...a pair of Coles 4038s... | There ya go.
|
| |
3rd March 2008
|
#14 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 299
|
Coles, Blumlein, +1
|
| |
3rd March 2008
|
#15 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2007 Location: South Georgia
Posts: 2,939
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Legacy While I really like using ribbons on violin, I'm not a fan of any I've tried on cello. Using ribbons as a main pair on an orchestra makes some sense to me (its usually a strong, dark coloration in my experience but a pleasing one) but on a solo cello it is often too dull / muddy sounding to me (without serious HF boost EQ).
In other words if you are talking about a single violin and a single cello (or a small section) in a studio I'd definitely recommend different mics for each. Ribbons for violin and a large diaphragm condenser (U67, Brauner, U47) for cello. | Hmm, I love my Oktava dual ribbon mic on cello. I've recorded a couple concerts by the cello professor at my college with it and I love the results. Not exactly a high-end mic but it works fantastically.
I have sample but it's a large file and I'm not on my workstation computer...if interested I'll post later tonight.
|
| |
3rd March 2008
|
#16 | | Gear Head
Joined: Mar 2007 Location: Netherlands
Posts: 61
| c617SET
nobody mentions it.. but Josephson C617SET is great on strings - also on lower range strings like cello and bass. (you have a point Silas..)
And don't let the 'omni' characteristic fool you, it has a fairly warm, gentle sound compared to other omni's, with great punch and tone.
michiel
product support joystick audio |
| |
3rd March 2008
|
#17 | | Gear interested
Joined: Jan 2008 Location: Glos, UK
Posts: 19
Thread Starter |
Thanks guys. A lot of good suggestions. I'll go for the Coles because I think it might lend itself to the production. If it doesn't work out as I think it will, I'll get some more obvious alternative out of the wardrobe :-)
I'll let you know how it worked out.
cheers and thanks for your time |
| |
4th March 2008
|
#18 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,689
|
I know from an ol spanish engineer that some DPA microphones are kind of (high quality) standard for classical strings recordings.
|
| |
4th March 2008
|
#19 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Jan 2005 Location: NYC
Posts: 642
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Corran Hmm, I love my Oktava dual ribbon mic on cello. I've recorded a couple concerts by the cello professor at my college with it and I love the results. Not exactly a high-end mic but it works fantastically.
I have sample but it's a large file and I'm not on my workstation computer...if interested I'll post later tonight. | Hi Corran,
I'm sure there are exceptions but with the darker old ones I've tried (Coles among them) it wasn't working for me as a spot mic. As a stereo pair I suspect I'd like them a lot more.
To Michiel - I agree the 617 is a nice mic. I bet its a very nice choice for a natural violin sound especially.
-Silas
|
| |
4th March 2008
|
#20 | | Gear addict
Joined: Feb 2006 Location: El Pueblo de Nuestra Señora la Reina de los Ángeles sobre El Rio Porciuncula
Posts: 331
| Quote:
Originally Posted by audiosuperheroes Hi, Any suggestions on mic's for recording Cello and Violin? | There are many, many good mics for recording a cello (or is it a celli section you're recording?) and a violin (or is it a section?)
I find the acoustics of the recording space to be very important as well, of course.
__________________ Scoring Mixer / Recording Engineer / Mastering Engineer
Los Angeles, California http://www.johnrodd.com |
| |
4th March 2008
|
#21 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Mar 2004 Location: Nashville
Posts: 2,550
|
Just finished up helping a producer set up and record a string quartet at the studio tonight. He was using the AEA stereo ribbon mic and the AEA mic pre..... both on demo from Vintage King... which is across the street.
I was VERY, VERY impressed. Sounded just lovely. We put the pre out in the room with the mics and used short cables from the mics to the pre's. Very good level, no noise.... just great. This combo is definitely on my wish list now!
|
| |
4th March 2008
|
#22 | | Lives for gear
Joined: May 2005 Location: EU
Posts: 2,559
|
First choice for me would be a pair of neumann M150
Other good options include the SF12 and Schoeps M222 mk2h/40mm APE.
|
| |
4th March 2008
|
#23 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Nov 2006 Location: silverlake
Posts: 1,401
|
221B's
67's
km 84's
sf 12
|
| |
4th March 2008
|
#24 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Apr 2007 Location: Seattle
Posts: 188
|
If a spot mic for cello is in order, the 122v can also be quite nice. The gentler response (compared to a Brauner at least) can do a bit to tame the added scratchiness close micing a string instrument tends to add. This, while (in my opinion) imparting all the benefits of an LDC tube mic, especially when matched with a fast micpre.
Though I agree ribbons can call for a bit of eq, I have found that with the sf-12 at least, a decibel or maybe two around 3.5 or 4k can really be plenty.
__________________
Christopher Wilson
|
| |
4th March 2008
|
#25 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Feb 2005 Location: Poland
Posts: 550
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Wilson If a spot mic for cello is in order, the 122v can also be quite nice. The gentler response (compared to a Brauner at least) can do a bit to tame the added scratchiness close micing a string instrument tends to add. This, while (in my opinion) imparting all the benefits of an LDC tube mic, especially when matched with a fast micpre.
Though I agree ribbons can call for a bit of eq, I have found that with the sf-12 at least, a decibel or maybe two around 3.5 or 4k can really be plenty. | Yep, trying to eq out the 'scratchiness' is much more of a problem than eq'ing in some hf!
Andy
|
| |
4th March 2008
|
#26 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Jul 2002 Location: Calabasas, California
Posts: 1,142
|
While I think mic selection matters greatly for most any source, I think mic position really trumps mic selection, where I would argue the opposite on most voices.
My suggestion is to not look and think about mic position, but listen. Put some headphones on close your eyes and move some mics around until your source(s) sound the best. many times on a violin its going to be slightly off axis. Your vertical placement is most of what matters for both cello and violin. Don't be afraid if the mic is at or below the plane of the violin. Going off axis can really help get you through a player with a poor quality instrument and/or poor tone/intonation. Lots of folks tend to immediately place a mic 1m above the violin. With the wrong player this can sound awful...and you have to eq so much that you destroy the integrity of the track.
Then consider proximity and room interaction, which completely depends on the track type (pop, classical, rock, etc). How relaxed of a sound or edgy of a sound are you looking for.
__________________
doug
|
| |
4th March 2008
|
#27 | | 3 + infractions, forum membership suspended.
Joined: Jun 2007 Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 2,378
|
Ribbon mics possibly. I would use a room mic or two.
|
| |
5th March 2008
|
#28 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 910
|
ive used a m160 on cello and upright bass and loved both.
u47 sounds gret on both too. |
| |
5th March 2008
|
#29 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Feb 2008 Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Posts: 6,749
| Quote:
Originally Posted by JEGG What differences do you hear between your 8040s and 40's on cello and violin-or strings in general? | The 8040 has an extended bottom end so it picks up more of the "warmth" that is in those lower 10Hz that the 40 misses - the 8040 also extends to 50kHz and does not quickly roll off just above 20kHz like the 40.
(It's also £400 cheaper  )
|
| |
6th March 2008
|
#30 | | Gear nut
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 129
|
I used the AEA R-88 with TRP on cello and it sounded fantastic.
|
| | | |