Tom Petty Playing to Backing Tracks - Page 5 - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording


Tags: , , , , ,

Tom Petty Playing to Backing Tracks

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 5th February 2008   #121
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,099

Quote:
Originally Posted by infopimpster View Post
Unless we are talking about their "live" albums.... no punch-ins on that.
If anyone insisted that it be 100% live then they'd get another band pronto.
...or no band at all!

That TV production didn't NEED Tom Petty!
dbbubba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2008   #122
Lives for gear
 
Heartfelt's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,443

"LEAVE BRITNEY ALOOOONE... err, i mean TOM... Leave Tom aloooone..."

You're lucky he performed for you!!!!
__________________
Robert Smith
Houston, TX
www.RobertSmithMusic.com
Heartfelt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2008   #123
Gear nut
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 78

Quote:
Originally Posted by loujudson View Post
Did they let the children out onto the field or did they hire extras? Or were they prerecorded too?
Pre-recorded... notice not one Patriot or Giant emblem on the lot of them... pretty unusual for a crowd at the super bowl that rushes the stage just overcome with the moment
MOFO PRO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2008   #124
Gear maniac
 
Master Tang's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 172

In all this debate of lip sync, and fakery, one has to wonder if Janet Jackson's lawyer had explained to the FCC that her hooter was fake, would have gotten away with it?
__________________
No way I'll wreck this... It's a beer truck eh?

www.iacmusic.com/fozzieandjack
Master Tang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2008   #125
Lives for gear
 
Sofa King's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 600

Send a message via AIM to Sofa King
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beyersound View Post

Sofa, you need to talk to more satellite guys, the performance is not what you think. There is much you don't know............
Dude,
What the hell does that mean?

Anyway, im sure there is more for everyone to learn, but there are some things I do know a bit about.


I’m not quite sure what your background is.
But, in my 20 years of recording and mixing music, the last 8 of those years have almost been exclusively been working on music for TV.
[And FWIW, its been my experience that the truck EIC deals with the bird [satellite], not me the music mixer.]



So I stand by what I said, that it was my opinion, that there were pre-recorded tracks going on.

Not that was a good or a bad thing.
Just what I felt.

No slagging, no demonstrative attitude, just an opinion.

all the best,
Sean
__________________
Sean McDonald
Sofa King Music Services
Website
http://www.seanmcdonald.com
Facebook
http://www.facebook.com/SeanMcDonald...gMusicServices
Sofa King is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2008   #126
Lives for gear
 
True North's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Location: Richmond Hill, Ontario (Canada)
Posts: 3,213

Quote:
Originally Posted by dbbubba View Post
You want to know how I knew it was a "studio" vocal almost immediately?

The vocal sound sounded extremely suspect to me as well.
True North is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2008   #127
Lives for gear
 
FFTT's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Location: A stoned throw from ground zero
Posts: 5,766

In a world with so much artificial talent it's hard for some people to grasp
that true professional artists like Tom Petty and The Heartbreakers actually are capable of performing every single one of their songs live with this degree of quality.

Aerosmith is equally capable and I've seen both bands live recently.

They really are that good.
__________________
Don't look at me in that tone of voice

Put music in your heart
and heart in your music
FFTT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2008   #128
JDN
Lives for gear
 
JDN's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 746

Quote:
Originally Posted by FFTT View Post
In a world with so much artificial talent it's hard for some people to grasp
that true professional artists like Tom Petty and The Heartbreakers actually are capable of performing every single one of their songs live with this degree of quality.

They really are that good.
I don't think people are questioning their tallent or capability, you're kinda missing the point. It's more about the logistics of getting something of that size on and off stage(putting the stage together nonetheless) without a problem in the alloted time. What if there's a bad cable, or a guitar mic that goes out. This is a huge event, and it's shown live and there's no do overs or time for troubleshotting....I really don't think it's the band being lazy or even wanting too for that matter, it's just the way it works.
JDN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2008   #129
Lives for gear
 
Sofa King's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 600

Send a message via AIM to Sofa King
Quote:
Originally Posted by FFTT View Post
In a world with so much artificial talent it's hard for some people to grasp
that true professional artists like [......snip......]
Aerosmith is equally capable and I've seen both bands live recently.

They really are that good.

yes and no.......

i dont want to throw anyone under the bus, but there are very visible members of this board that have first hand experience with recording and or mixing of that band, and he told me about racks of DA88s with gtrs, vocals, and percussion.

not saying that the practice is wrong, just saying that its pretty common place.



best,
Sean
Sofa King is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2008   #130
Lives for gear
 
FFTT's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Location: A stoned throw from ground zero
Posts: 5,766

You might want to read this post.

Seems wireless cameras also have latency issues.

http://www.gearslutz.com/board/1814956-post19.html
FFTT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2008   #131
Lives for gear
 
Beyersound's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Location: Vegas, Norcal
Posts: 3,608

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sofa King View Post
Dude,
What the hell does that mean?

Anyway, im sure there is more for everyone to learn, but there are some things I do know a bit about.


I’m not quite sure what your background is.
But, in my 20 years of recording and mixing music, the last 8 of those years have almost been exclusively been working on music for TV.
[And FWIW, its been my experience that the truck EIC deals with the bird [satellite], not me the music mixer.]



So I stand by what I said, that it was my opinion, that there were pre-recorded tracks going on.

Not that was a good or a bad thing.
Just what I felt.

No slagging, no demonstrative attitude, just an opinion.

all the best,
Sean
It's Ok Sean, I'm feelin your love. I never doubted the prescence of tracks, I was just trying to get people to think about how "live" a live performance really needs to be. I also have many decades in this business and have done TV audio all the way from ENG to Stage A2, to FOH Mixer, to Truck Mixer. Past the EIC there is the actual satellite truck uplink guy. A good friend of mine is a chief engineer for one of those companies. What I meant by talking to those guys was the relative delay problems between audio and video and how they differ from analog tv to digi tv. I understand you might have seen things that didn't match at all, but the HD broadcast I saw had massive delay problems also. Many providers don't consult with the guys who send them their signal, and many times the A/V sync sucks! To simplify my point: Let's not be too hard on the band, I have done many a music awards show where artists had so many studio tracks that it was embarassing to call it a live performance(Spice Girls..........Sorry, was I thinking out loud?). Hey, where is your studio anyway? Your site doesn't list it!
__________________
Congratulations 2010 World Champion SF Giants!!!

"There is no crying in baseball, there are no rules in recording!!!"
www.myspace.com/beyeraudio

Michael Beyer
Beyersound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2008   #132
Lives for gear
 
Sofa King's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 600

Send a message via AIM to Sofa King
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beyersound View Post
To simplify my point: Let's not be too hard on the band
That is my point.

I wasnt too hard on the band.
I didnt say anything about them.


Nor was I making judgments about the use of backing tracks, I just offered an opinion to the original poster and the original topic, as to if there were backing tracks.

and I got some sort of "youve got alot to learn" comment from you.
[ in the future, you might want to see your target before you pull the trigger]
also thanks for the info about there being an actual guy in the sat truck manging the hop, i never knew that.


[sarcasm off]
For the record, I saw no sync issues with the production audio.
And if there were issues, like encode or decode delays, or problems with the satelite hops, [which again I did not have].....
those issues have nothing to do with the tonality of a vocal mic changing when a guy is singing to when the guy talks to the crowd.

Nor does it create phantom tom fills.

Lastly, and this might be better explored and confirmed in the Post forum, but i think the Dolby E encode delay is 2 frames, but its always compensated for.


best,
Sean
Sofa King is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2008   #133
Gear maniac
 
fenderbender.'s Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: Golden
Posts: 224

Talking

I can't believe some of you people! Blah, blah, blah... How many of you were drunk, watching the superbowl with a room full of people, in standard def., thru a shitty sound system with its own delays, etc.???

I was watching in HD, and I did pause and rewind quite a bit. I won't claim to know it all, and I have no inside information, but I think this shit about things being out of sync is just...well...shit! Would you evaluate a mix that was put thru 6 different random mp3 compressors? Given how much everybody bitches about mp3's, and then to turn around and 'critically listen' to the audio while ignoring the fact that the audio has been thru who-know-how-many-and-what-the-**** various boxes along the way from the FOH rig to your TV... What a joke?

And you, (see below) - I watched carefully and time shifted quite a bit. There was a 57 on the snare, beta 98's on the toms, a beta 52 in the kick, and beta 52's or beta 56's on some of the amps. That's all I could make out.


Quote:
... Not live. There were too many sync issues that were random. ... didn't see many mics on the drums except for the OH and I didn't see mics on the GTR amps...
You're all SPECULATING, so quit acting like you're all ****ing experts on the subject. I'm not saying any one person is right or wrong, and I'm not trying to insult anybody, but unless you were there - you don't know jack!

(now go watch it on youtube and come back and pretend to now be certain in your speculations. what a great discussion we have going on this forum for audio professionals!)
fenderbender. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2008   #134
Gear nut
 
Jesse Miller's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: Islamorada FL Keys
Posts: 88

Quote:
Originally Posted by daryllh View Post
Jordan Sparks was all over the lip-syncing folks.

Petty was good I thought. I had forgotten Ron Blair was back playing with them. Would have been cool to have Stan Lynch up there too. Course, I'm more of an old school Heartbreakers fan than newer.
I do beleive it was Howie Ebstein back on bass and not Ron Blair. Howie toured last year with them as well. I also beleive it was Stan Lynch on Keys, although he passed on last years tour he is now back on board as well.

These guys are now and always have been at the top of there game. If there were backing tracks ( and i for one highly doubt it) it was likly for automation purposes and not for "spicing" up there live sound.

Seen them live up close, from FOH and Monitor land and it is what it is. LIVE music by PROS who can play.....
__________________
Sessions Recording
Islamorada FL Keys
Jesse Miller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2008   #135
Lives for gear
 
vernier's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,130

Howie died five years ago. RIP.
vernier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2008   #136
Lives for gear
 
FFTT's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Location: A stoned throw from ground zero
Posts: 5,766

Would serve a few of you well to buy the Runnin' Down The Dream 4 disc set.
FFTT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2008   #137
Gear maniac
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 299

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse Miller View Post
I do beleive it was Howie Ebstein back on bass and not Ron Blair. Howie toured last year with them as well. I also beleive it was Stan Lynch on Keys, although he passed on last years tour he is now back on board as well.
unbelievable....


anyway, I wanted to bring up something interesting which no one else seems to have mentioned, and that is the fact that they played the first song, "American Girl" in C# (a half-step lower than the original key) and then-without changing guitars- played "I Won't Back Down" in G (the original key) and continued to play the remaining two songs in their original keys. If you play guitar, it's easy to watch Mike and Tom's hands on the guitars and see that they are playing the regular first-position chords in both songs, which would be impossible without either re-tuning between songs (which they didn't take the time to do), using a capo on one of the songs (which they didn't do) or running the guitars' signals through a pitch transposing device on the first song (not out of the realm of possibility, but my instincts say uh-uh...)

(before you jump all over me for the capo comment, yes I know Tom used a capo for "Free Fallin"...I'm not talking about that, just about the apparent tuning paradox in the first two songs)

So clearly there was more going than meets the eye....
trippy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2008   #138
Gear maniac
 
jammybastard's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: 30 sq miles surrounded by reality!
Posts: 164

Quote:
Originally Posted by fenderbender. View Post
You're all SPECULATING, so quit acting like you're all ****ing experts on the subject. I'm not saying any one person is right or wrong, and I'm not trying to insult anybody, but unless you were there - you don't know jack!

(now go watch it on youtube and come back and pretend to now be certain in your speculations. what a great discussion we have going on this forum for audio professionals!)

As for the HD sync issue.... It can happen at the station in the IRD or at home in your set...or both. May also happen at the production truck, uplink, downlink at network, uplink at network, downlink at the satellite service provider, downlink at the cable head end or wherever the data is processed.

Fox and all the networks spend alot of time doing sync tests the day of the show but most affiliates have several frames of audio delay in at all times. That way they have more pad for error.

If I had to guess what happened at the half time show it would be something like this: There was a separate truck producing the half-time. When the main truck cut to that truck, or when network switched to that trucks feed there was a break in the data stream. This caused the a/v buffers to get out of sync. with the video writing out behind the audio in time or your set choked on the glitch and it's buffers got out of sync. In either case this would be seen at home as the stick hitting the drum before you heard it.

Now is this what happened?
No idea, I wasn't on the show so I don't have a definitive answer.
Watching it via OTA HD w/ 5.1 I defiantely saw sync issues and it looked to me like it was the players and not a broadcast issue.
__________________
"I like whatever makes good records. I don't care how it's made, nobody cares how a record is made. They only care if they like it or not."
-Tom Petty
jammybastard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2008   #139
Lives for gear
 
Plush's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: EARS/Chicago
Posts: 4,274

I saw live

Don't know what the doubters saw.
Plush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2008   #140
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 9,921

with the degrees of separation being what they are, and the amount of people on Gearslutz who know somebody who knows somebody WE ought to be able to get it from the horse's mouth, if anyone can.
__________________
.

“What you ask about is music. What you like is sound. Now music and sound are akin, but they are not the same.”
— Confucius
joeq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2008   #141
Gear maniac
 
Master Tang's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 172

You guys are all bagging on the wrong Tom for phoning it in.
Master Tang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2008   #142
Gear maniac
 
snüzz's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: n.c.
Posts: 285

Quote:


anyway, I wanted to bring up something interesting which no one else seems to have mentioned, and that is the fact that they played the first song, "American Girl" in C# (a half-step lower than the original key) and then-without changing guitars- played "I Won't Back Down" in G (the original key) and continued to play the remaining two songs in their original keys. If you play guitar, it's easy to watch Mike and Tom's hands on the guitars and see that they are playing the regular first-position chords in both songs, which would be impossible without either re-tuning between songs (which they didn't take the time to do), using a capo on one of the songs (which they didn't do) or running the guitars' signals through a pitch transposing device on the first song (not out of the realm of possibility, but my instincts say uh-uh...)

(before you jump all over me for the capo comment, yes I know Tom used a capo for "Free Fallin"...I'm not talking about that, just about the apparent tuning paradox in the first two songs)

So clearly there was more going than meets the eye....
[/quote]

interesting! AND he was spotted behind the grassy knoll.
snüzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2008   #143
Gear maniac
 
jammybastard's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: 30 sq miles surrounded by reality!
Posts: 164

Quote:
Originally Posted by snüzz View Post
interesting! AND he was spotted behind the grassy knoll.
I saw his headstock go "back and to the left", "back and to the left", "back and to the left", etc...
jammybastard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2008   #144
Gear maniac
 
jammybastard's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: 30 sq miles surrounded by reality!
Posts: 164

Quote:
Originally Posted by snüzz View Post
interesting! AND he was spotted behind the grassy knoll.
I saw his headstock go "back and to the left", "back and to the left", "back and to the left", etc...
jammybastard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2008   #145
Gear addict
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Location: Newburgh, IN
Posts: 441

So I guess after 5 pages what we can agree on is that it's a mystery inside a riddle wrapped in an enigma....
__________________
Bob Green
Area 51 Recording Studio
area51recording is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2008   #146
Lives for gear
 
joelpatterson's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: Albany, New York
Posts: 9,509

I'm certain that someday-- there will a deathbed confession.
joelpatterson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2008   #147
Gear Guru
 
Sounds Great's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 15,301

Seems that this comes up every year now.

At least we know for sure that Janet's boob was real, er, well... actually
__________________
http://soundcloud.com/sounds-great-1

-Rob

And these children that you spit on
As they try to change their worlds
Are immune to your consultations
They're quite aware of what they're going through
Sounds Great is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2008   #148
Gear Guru
 
tINY's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Orygun
Posts: 10,233



Whatever the 1/2 time show was, we know that the game was fake.

They act better than the WWF, though...





-tINY

tINY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2008   #149
Gear interested
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 22

Quote:
Originally Posted by allencollins View Post
They sounded so bad I find it hard to believe they had any help.
Those guys are such terrible musicians it's pathetic.

The only guy in the Heartbreakers who could actually play his instrument
was the original drummer. Then they kicked him out cuz he eventually
played worse than the rest of them over time

go figure
This is one of the stupidest comments I've ever read in any blog. You might not like their music, but to say they're bad musicians?

Congrats man, you've really acheived a new low of stupidity.
gtrman100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2008   #150
Gear maniac
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 299

he's actually really smart...just ask him.
trippy is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Playing live to backing tracks strawdps Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 44 7th June 2011 01:12 AM
tom petty acoustics blackwatch5805 So much gear, so little time! 8 6th February 2008 05:04 AM
New Tom Petty demel So much gear, so little time! 6 11th July 2006 08:03 PM
Tom Petty vox Micgiver High end 7 26th August 2005 06:37 PM
Tom Petty-ish Track syra Work In Progress / Advice Requested / Show & Tell / Artist Showcase / Mix-Offs 2 23rd May 2005 05:42 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:57 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.