Tracking cans that give good mud - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording


Tags:

Tracking cans that give good mud

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 29th January 2008   #1
Lives for gear
 
Jimbo's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,519

Thread Starter
Question Tracking cans that give good mud

I'm looking for a set of close-backed cans that will let me hear low-end problems (e.g., muddy/boomy acoustic guitars/basses) if they exist while tracking. If there's a problem down below, I want to hear it while I'm placing the mic.

While I love my Etymotics, they just don't do a good job of letting me hear low-end problems.

I'm currently considering the Beyer DT770 and the new Audio Technica ATM-50, but will happily entertain other options. It's important, however, that they do a decent job of blocking-out external sounds.

Thanks for the help.
__________________

Jimbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th January 2008   #2
Lives for gear
 
pkautzsch's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 1,520

Everything sounds good on DT770. I give it to impatient customers and to musicians for their ego.
To actually evaluate what I'm doing I use the Beyer DT250. If it sounds good on these, it IS good. Lowest impedance version is LOUD too.
__________________
Microphones always make me sound louder and better! -- Guitar Girl
pkautzsch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th January 2008   #3
Gear addict
 
richardswag's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Location: Wakefield, UK
Posts: 443

I normally use Sennheiser HD280s for 'work' in the studio (ie. writing and mixing) but I have some Sony MDR-V700s that I used to use for live/DJ work *because* they have a very pronounced low end (as well as being loud) - so maybe they might be worth considering if you want to look at your bottom.
richardswag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th January 2008   #4
Lives for gear
 
Jim vanBergen's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Location: New York Friggin' City
Posts: 2,562

HD280s are the closest I have found to reproduce good LF in phones, but I'm still not thrilled with them. Grados are pretty damn accurate, but don't give the best isolation. it's a constant battle, isn't it?
Jim vanBergen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th January 2008   #5
Lives for gear
 
tenor39's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 595

The Ultrasone Pro-750's are absolutely the best closed-back 'phones I've use for recording. It it's there, you'll hear it.
__________________
Mike Morgan
Isle of Skye Audio Productions
http://www.RecordClassical.com
Audio Director and Announcing Chair for Pyrotechinics Guild International
www.pgi.org

tenor39 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th January 2008   #6
Gear nut
 
Joined: May 2006
Location: The point of no return
Posts: 91

I like the HD280's because I hate the sound of them.

I know that sounds crazy, but for me it's true. The Sony 7506 and 09 sound too "pretty" for me - I don't trust them. In order to get what I want using 7506's, I have to guess by making it sound too close and bright - it's usually just right.

The HD280's aren't great for detail or imaging and they are kind of midrangey sounding. If I can get it to sound good in there, it will usually sound good anywhere. On the downside, to me they are a little uncomfortable and I have trouble listening to them for long periods of time.
__________________
"Now you listen to me - are you gonna dither down quietly or am I gonna have to truncate you?" - scene from "A Bronx mastering Tale"
locosoundman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th January 2008   #7
Lives for gear
 
videoteque's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: Near Rome, Italy
Posts: 829

Now I may say a stupid thing, but in-ear monitors plus a muff are not good to isolate and provide good bass??

You will look funny though!!!
videoteque is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th January 2008   #8
Lives for gear
 
Jimbo's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,519

Thread Starter
Thanks for the feedback, folks.

Lot's of good suggestions here.

I'm going to see if I can find a place that will let me audition three or four pair (good luck, huh? )

Videoteque: Will earmuffs help me hear boomy low-end with the Etys? Currently, without muffs, I don't hear boomy acoustic guitar until the boominess hits about a "7" on the boominess scale (1-10) as measured through my Dynaudios.

Jim VB: I hadn't considered open back cans. While they won't help much with placement, they might, at least, allow me to accurately evaluate between takes. I think I might point myself this direction. The Grado's are fairly inexpensive too...
Jimbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th January 2008   #9
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: Washington, D.C. area
Posts: 802

I just got a pair of the ATH-M50s. My initial impressions are that they are quite good. Compared to 7506s, the ATHs have a better low end and not as hyped highs. Compared to the DT770 Pro, the ATHs are a little less comfortable, but also less pretty sounding. I like the DT770s for listening, and for longer sessions, but I think the ATHs might give a more accurate idea of what's going on in the sound field.

The ATHs are clear all around, have a nice stereo representation, and they don't seem to accentuate any particular frequency range. They're still new, and their sound might change with more use, but out of the box, they are quite usable. Also, I can see them being good for the talent to use while tracking.
Jungle Jazz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2008   #10
Lives for gear
 
videoteque's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: Near Rome, Italy
Posts: 829

Quote:
Will earmuffs help me hear boomy low-end with the Etys?
Only you can know!!!
videoteque is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2008   #11
Lives for gear
 
Jimbo's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,519

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by videoteque View Post
Only you can know!!!
Well, based on your initial post, my assumption was that you have tried the Etys with earmuffs on boomy guitars and such.....no?

If not, I don't think that extra isolation (provided by earmuffs) will help me hear the low-end better.

Thanks, though.
Jimbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st February 2008   #12
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 975

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimbo View Post
Well, based on your initial post, my assumption was that you have tried the Etys with earmuffs on boomy guitars and such.....no?

If not, I don't think that extra isolation (provided by earmuffs) will help me hear the low-end better.

Thanks, though.
My experience is that the etys won't give you the low end you seek. The new Futuresonics Atrios, will, though. Beyond that, I have the Beyer DT770s and the AT ATM-50s as well. I like them both, but I give the edge to the ATs for this. I haven't used them in very loud environments to judge low end, but they should work. When it gets really loud, I use the Atrios with shooting muffs. I have Westone earmolds made for the UM1 in ears that fit perfectly and this gives me a great seal and with the earmuffs, very very good isolation.

I know I didn't give you a definitive answer, but I think all three should work OK although I find that the Beyers don't always give me the best results. They seal OK, but the low end still leaks a lot.

Edwin
edwinhurwitz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st February 2008   #13
Lives for gear
 
videoteque's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: Near Rome, Italy
Posts: 829

I am glad I am not the only one who thinks it can be done...

Of course you must find in-ears that you like and feel confident about!
videoteque is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st February 2008   #14
Lives for gear
 
klaukholm's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: EU
Posts: 2,431

HD650 and sony 7509 are both very good for this purpose.
the sennheiser is open and the sony provides good isolation
klaukholm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st February 2008   #15
Gear nut
 
salvomix's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 86

A lot of studios I work in have Fostex T-20's, the workhorse of studio headphones.

www.salvomix.com
salvomix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd February 2008   #16
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 850

Any opinions on the EX-29 Extreme Isolation compared with the Senn HD280 pro? Besides using earbuds, which headphones really prevent mic bleed the most for musicians listening?
aracu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd February 2008   #17
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 850

I had a chance today to compare a Senn HD 280 with a Beyer DT 770. They sound completely different. The Sennheiser is more of a decent quality hyped bass and treble sound, and the Beyer is more along the lines of a high quality flat sound for mixing. The Beyer is more comfortable and classy, but the Sennheiser is much more isolating and has a hotter output. It would be more practical to use in mic bleed situations. Also it costs around half as much. I also checked out an Audio Tech M45, it sounded similar to the Sennheiser, similar price, not quite as good sounding I thought. I want to compare also an Extreme Isolation ex 29 if I can find one. It might sound flatter than the Sennheiser.
aracu is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mud in my mids, my speakers sound too good MikeMitchell So much gear, so little time! 15 12th March 2009 04:48 AM
I need a good set of cans. Need some advice. imdrecordings So much gear, so little time! 16 18th December 2007 12:33 PM
good cans - are hd600 muddy sounding ? fatgaz Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 22 20th August 2007 04:41 PM
Cans that sound good at lower volumes mipearson So much gear, so little time! 0 6th March 2007 12:56 AM
Needs some good cans! kikumoto So much gear, so little time! 2 3rd August 2006 01:45 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:55 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.