Field Recorders: What's a girl to do? - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording


Tags: , ,

Field Recorders: What's a girl to do?

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 8th November 2007   #1
Gear interested
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 16

Thread Starter
Question Field Recorders: What's a girl to do?

Howdy,


I was hoping i could get some help.

I'm looking to upgrade from my a bit less than satisfactory Ramko Research "Sidekick", but I'm not sure where to go. I'm pretty into the Sound Devices 302 and 442, but both are a bit weightier on the wallet than I'm hoping for. However, I am looking for precisely that functionality, so maybe I need to bite the bullet. Ideally, I'd like to be working with 4 channels, but given that I'm mostly recording to an FR-2 right now, I'm not going to be able to accomplish much with 4 channels than I can't with 3 at the moment.


Does anybody have any machines they're fond of?


Thanks all.
HarrisKarlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th November 2007   #2
Gear nut
 
NOLAfishwater's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 107

Heres is a smoking deal on an R4. It is the most affordable 4 channel recorder out there. Edirol just had a price drop on this recorder. If you are looking to get quality live recordings you can have the preamps modified.

Edirol R4
NOLAfishwater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th November 2007   #3
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 290

Sound Devices stuff is very nice. They just do what they're supposed to do, at a high quality level, and do it correctly everytime. I don't think you'll ever second-guess a decision to buy any of their equipment.
bove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th November 2007   #4
Lives for gear
 
tnjazz's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,809

Are you looking for a mixer or a new recorder?
tnjazz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th November 2007   #5
Gear addict
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 498

Quote:
Originally Posted by NOLAfishwater View Post
Heres is a smoking deal on an R4. It is the most affordable 4 channel recorder out there. Edirol just had a price drop on this recorder. If you are looking to get quality live recordings you can have the preamps modified.

Edirol R4
I'm tempted by the price drop, but man - most of the reviews slam those on-board mic pres saying they're really noisy. Not sure how much the Oade bros. pre mod costs, but Edirol claims the R4 Pro has better preamps.

How bad is bad? Anyone know what those preamps compare to? Could you power a ribbon with them, for example?

There has to be something in the pipeline from some manufcturer that will be better/faster/cheaper...at least I hope.
leddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th November 2007   #6
Gear maniac
 
springer's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 293

Hey Leddy,
I can speak for pres in these smaller units but not for the Edirol specific...

Even my oade modded PMD660 cannot perform with the average ribbon. I do get modest results with the R122. I am assuming that most of the small form factor units are similar in this respect as I heard nothing good about any of their preamps when I was shopping. Let's just say you would not be happy with the results of any recordings made with the stock preamps. With the exception for (maybe) Sound Devices...
Now as for the Oade modded unit I have - I love the recordings I get with it - as long as I do not max the preamp gain. The "tapers" all rave about AKG c480s so I picked up a pair and really have to say that they are a great pairing with the Oade equipment.
I do mostly jazz and classical. Rockers mileage may be quite varied.

I have to add that going minimal yields some great sounds. Some of my 2 tracks are my favs, far out performing those done with 6-8 tracks.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th November 2007   #7
Gear nut
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 96

I guess there is a slim chance that some Nagra V's may come into the second-hand market once the VI is released; possibly at reasonable prices, since the price point of the VI is touted to be lower than the 2 channel V.

Bit of a long shot, but wouldn't it be lovely!
DaveD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th November 2007   #8
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,254

Quote:
Originally Posted by bove View Post
Sound Devices stuff is very nice. They just do what they're supposed to do, at a high quality level, and do it correctly everytime. I don't think you'll ever second-guess a decision to buy any of their equipment.
+1 indeed
MichaelPatrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th November 2007   #9
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: Pune, India
Posts: 270

Sonosax??

Quote:
Originally Posted by HarrisKarlin View Post
Howdy,


I was hoping i could get some help.

I'm looking to upgrade from my a bit less than satisfactory Ramko Research "Sidekick", but I'm not sure where to go. I'm pretty into the Sound Devices 302 and 442, but both are a bit weightier on the wallet than I'm hoping for. However, I am looking for precisely that functionality, so maybe I need to bite the bullet. Ideally, I'd like to be working with 4 channels, but given that I'm mostly recording to an FR-2 right now, I'm not going to be able to accomplish much with 4 channels than I can't with 3 at the moment.


Does anybody have any machines they're fond of?


Thanks all.
It looks like you are looking for a mixer to frond end the FR-2 or perhaps record four channels at once?? Your message heading and body are a bit conflicted. In any case, if you are considering something with a four channel front-end AND a recorder or are just looking for a three channel mixer, check out this link from Sonosax.

SONOSAX Audio equipment manufacturer

This company is not touted much in the US sound engineering circles but is one of the standards in the film world and in the audio world. They are expensive but the four channel mixer/8 channel recorder will probably be one of the best combos out there; I have used their pres/mixers and have used their stand alone 8 channel recorder on which this machine is based ... if you just wanted a mixer then please ignore this post.

Baithak
PS: The rest of the location slutz out there should cast an eye on the SX62. I am hoping to get one to replace almost all my location gear ...
Baithak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th November 2007   #10
Gear interested
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 16

Thread Starter

Quote:
This company is not touted much in the US sound engineering circles but is one of the standards in the film world and in the audio world. They are expensive but the four channel mixer/8 channel recorder will probably be one of the best combos out there; I have used their pres/mixers and have used their stand alone 8 channel recorder on which this machine is based ... if you just wanted a mixer then please ignore this post.

Baithak
PS: The rest of the location slutz out there should cast an eye on the SX62. I am hoping to get one to replace almost all my location gear ...



I am just looking for a mixer, but that SX-62R does look pretty great. Out of my price range for the moment, but I have a new subject for my wet dreams.

I think I'm just biting the bullet and going with the 302. I'm only have 2 channels to record to at the moment, so a 3 channel mixer should do what I want for a while, and the 302 does pretty much exactly what I want it to, how I want it to, and I like how it sounds, so I might as well just bite the bullet and plunk down the change.
HarrisKarlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th November 2007   #11
Gear nut
 
NOLAfishwater's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 107

Quote:
Originally Posted by leddy View Post
I'm tempted by the price drop, but man - most of the reviews slam those on-board mic pres saying they're really noisy. Not sure how much the Oade bros. pre mod costs, but Edirol claims the R4 Pro has better preamps.

How bad is bad? Anyone know what those preamps compare to? Could you power a ribbon with them, for example?

There has to be something in the pipeline from some manufcturer that will be better/faster/cheaper...at least I hope.
Most tapers send their R4's off to be modded. It is about $325 for all 4 channels and is well worth it. Most people are getting the Busman hybrid mod which is Vintage (warm) on 1&2 channels and then Transparent on 3&4. Pretty sweet set up. PM me for a contact. Oade mods are time tested but cost a bit more than the Busman mods. Basically, Busman is the first person to start modding units in competition with Oade.
NOLAfishwater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th November 2007   #12
Gear addict
 
Gravity's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 355

Quote:
Originally Posted by HarrisKarlin View Post


I am just looking for a mixer, but that SX-62R does look pretty great. Out of my price range for the moment, but I have a new subject for my wet dreams.

I think I'm just biting the bullet and going with the 302. I'm only have 2 channels to record to at the moment, so a 3 channel mixer should do what I want for a while, and the 302 does pretty much exactly what I want it to, how I want it to, and I like how it sounds, so I might as well just bite the bullet and plunk down the change.
Ok so you're not looking for a recorder, but for a mixer? I have to +2 the guys about Sound Devices. You will never regret buying one. They will last forever, they sound amazing, and you could light the set in a pinch with the glare off the meters.

442's are awesome, and the 702T and 744T top the Nagras for me any day.
__________________
"Very funny Scotty... Now beam down my pants!"

When I'm not doing audio:
Amplexus Music
Gravity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th November 2007   #13
Gear nut
 
NOLAfishwater's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 107

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gravity View Post
Ok so you're not looking for a recorder, but for a mixer? I have to +2 the guys about Sound Devices. You will never regret buying one. They will last forever, they sound amazing, and you could light the set in a pinch with the glare off the meters.

442's are awesome, and the 702T and 744T top the Nagras for me any day.
If I could afford a 744, that is the way to go. It is hands down the best on the market and they are built like tanks. However R4 = $855 and 744 = $4100
NOLAfishwater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th November 2007   #14
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 194

Send a message via AIM to TheGetDown
what about the R4 with an apogee mini-me via SPDIF???? thinking of going that route.
TheGetDown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th November 2007   #15
Gear addict
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 498

Quote:
Originally Posted by NOLAfishwater View Post
Most tapers send their R4's off to be modded. It is about $325 for all 4 channels and is well worth it. Most people are getting the Busman hybrid mod which is Vintage (warm) on 1&2 channels and then Transparent on 3&4. Pretty sweet set up. PM me for a contact. Oade mods are time tested but cost a bit more than the Busman mods. Basically, Busman is the first person to start modding units in competition with Oade.
I ordered the R4 today. I want to check out how it sounds stock, then I'll check out some mods. I'll PM you for a contact soon. Thanks for the info.

If I really need to, I can drag along my Sytek 4-ch preamp. It would be great to not have to bring more gear though...
leddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th November 2007   #16
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,323

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveD View Post
I guess there is a slim chance that some Nagra V's may come into the second-hand market once the VI is released; possibly at reasonable prices, since the price point of the VI is touted to be lower than the 2 channel V.

Bit of a long shot, but wouldn't it be lovely!
Slim being the operative word. I am going to get the Nagra VI, but will not sell the V, because it is worth more to keep it and use it.

Quote:
442's are awesome, and the 702T and 744T top the Nagras for me any day.
We have a 442, a 702 and a Nagra V. The Nagra V pres are better than both the 702 and the 442, and the ergonomics of the Nagra V are much better than the 702. Its all about talented design. The SD recorders are nice, but they are much more difficult to use in low light in particular but also in general. The menus are much more complicated almost to the extent that you need to carry the manual with you at all times. With the Nagra this is never necessary.
David Spearritt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th November 2007   #17
Gear addict
 
maestro's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 419

Manual?

I would love to hear a Nagra in action. However, i bought the Sound Devices 744T (same operation as the 702) and read the manual in one day and know exactly how to work the 744T. I'm not a natural techie but i only own the 744 a few months and would have no need to carry the manual around with me.One of the easiest pieces of equipment i ever worked with.
maestro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th November 2007   #18
Gear maniac
 
springer's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 293

Sure wish the folks at SD would put 4 XLRs on that 744... Santa are you listening? ( am I mistaken or do they call it a 4 channel recorder?) I am hoping the site pics and manuals are just incorrect and it actually has 4 XLRs.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th November 2007   #19
Lives for gear
 
tnjazz's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,809

Quote:
Originally Posted by springer View Post
Sure wish the folks at SD would put 4 XLRs on that 744... Santa are you listening? ( am I mistaken or do they call it a 4 channel recorder?) I am hoping the site pics and manuals are just incorrect and it actually has 4 XLRs.
It does, but the second pair is line in only and they are mini XLRs.
__________________
Authorized dealer for Audient, Avenson, JZ, Metric Halo, Milab, Nevaton and Violet Design
Come visit us at BIG PURPLE DOG
tnjazz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th November 2007   #20
Gear addict
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 498

Quote:
Originally Posted by springer View Post
Hey Leddy,
I can speak for pres in these smaller units but not for the Edirol specific...

Even my oade modded PMD660 cannot perform with the average ribbon. I do get modest results with the R122. I am assuming that most of the small form factor units are similar in this respect as I heard nothing good about any of their preamps when I was shopping. Let's just say you would not be happy with the results of any recordings made with the stock preamps. With the exception for (maybe) Sound Devices...
Now as for the Oade modded unit I have - I love the recordings I get with it - as long as I do not max the preamp gain. The "tapers" all rave about AKG c480s so I picked up a pair and really have to say that they are a great pairing with the Oade equipment.
I do mostly jazz and classical. Rockers mileage may be quite varied.

I have to add that going minimal yields some great sounds. Some of my 2 tracks are my favs, far out performing those done with 6-8 tracks.
I got my R4 and tested it out. The stock pres are disappointing, as many have said. It may be obvious, but it all comes down to mic selection. High-output mics pair up well with it. My MC930's work well. Earthworks are not quite as good as the Beyers, but acceptable. Oktava MC012's - ok on louder sources. Dynamics...maybe for handheld vocalist swallowing the mic. Otherwise, I'll need to bring another pre or get it modded. I'll probably stick with it stock. I wanted something small and portable. I have an HD24 rig with decent preamps if I need something more.
leddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th November 2007   #21
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 2,240

I've been using my MacPro and an Mbox2Pro.
If you need four mic ins.. then it doesn't work .. but you can get
2 mic and 2 line and it's already in Protools .. maybe even with
markers ;-)

jeff
jmarkham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th November 2007   #22
Gear interested
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 20

Well, is it still good to send line level to the R4 from the line outs of the SD302? I just might be getting the R4 for 4 channel line-in recorder.
Alan H Chang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th November 2007   #23
Lives for gear
 
sonare's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: southeast
Posts: 1,393

Quote:
Originally Posted by APOHStudios View Post
Any other opinions or choices? 24/48 is a minimum format for my requirements with at least one channel with +48v
The one time I used the TASCAM HD-P2 I was SHOCKED how good is sounded. No noise from the micamps, and the A/D wasn't shabby either. This was a classical gig with a ridiculous dynamic range, BTW. Records to a flashcard rather than HD.

If only it had 4 channels!

Rich
__________________
Sonare Recordings
www.sonarerecordings.com
sonare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th December 2007   #24
Gear maniac
 
Factory101's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 159

+3 Sound Devices 702 - once bitten forever smitten.
Factory101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th January 2008   #25
Super Moderator
 
Remoteness's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,405

So, what did the girl do?
Remoteness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th January 2008   #26
Gear Guru
 
charles maynes's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Location: out in the dirt.
Posts: 15,625

Buy the Sound Devices machine- then you will be done for a while with buying portable recorders.

they are the gold standard. (at least for the money).
__________________
Charles Maynes credits
Charles' webpage

"Better the Arabs do it tolerably than that you do it perfectly. It is their war, and you are to help them, not to win it for them." T.E. Lawrence

today is a good day to make your obituary better....



General Smedley Butler- WAR IS A RACKET

American Rhetoric: Dwight D. Eisenhower - Farewell Address
charles maynes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th January 2008   #27
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 208

buy the sound devices.............
scifijedi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2008   #28
Gear maniac
 
Djembe's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 209

Has anyone tried the Edirol R4 Pro? - supposedly improved preamps.
Djembe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2008   #29
Gear addict
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 309

+5 sound devices. we use them all over the world, and they always perform flawlessly.
jacobfarron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2008   #30
Gear nut
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Grass Valley, CA
Posts: 76

The R4 and R4pro with modifications are much better sound than the sound devices units and at least half the cost. The Sound Devices products are much more rugged but as long as you keep the R4s in a soft case they will fair just fine.

You can get the R4 on ebay for 895 then the mod is $300 from me.

Go to the live music archive and type in Busman and you will find plenty of examples of sound quality with many different microphones.
Internet Archive: Audio Archive
busman is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
It's a Girl! Yetti So much gear, so little time! 46 4th April 2007 08:07 AM
This girl I know... Labs Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production 28 1st April 2006 02:23 PM
It's a girl!! 2leod The Good News Channel 5 17th May 2004 03:42 AM
Portable field recorders excellrec Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 11 7th April 2004 08:11 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:59 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.