Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording

Tags: , ,

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
It's a Girl! Yetti So much gear, so little time! 44 4th April 2007 08:07 AM
Palm sized stereo/4 tk field recorders?? woods Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 0 2nd October 2006 06:14 PM
This girl I know... Labs Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production 28 1st April 2006 02:23 PM
It's a girl!! 2leod The good news channel 5 17th May 2004 03:42 AM
Portable field recorders excellrec Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 11 7th April 2004 08:11 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 8th November 2007, 06:26 PM   #1
HarrisKarlin
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 11
Question Field Recorders: What's a girl to do?

Howdy,


I was hoping i could get some help.

I'm looking to upgrade from my a bit less than satisfactory Ramko Research "Sidekick", but I'm not sure where to go. I'm pretty into the Sound Devices 302 and 442, but both are a bit weightier on the wallet than I'm hoping for. However, I am looking for precisely that functionality, so maybe I need to bite the bullet. Ideally, I'd like to be working with 4 channels, but given that I'm mostly recording to an FR-2 right now, I'm not going to be able to accomplish much with 4 channels than I can't with 3 at the moment.


Does anybody have any machines they're fond of?


Thanks all.
HarrisKarlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th November 2007, 07:28 PM   #2
NOLAfishwater
Gear Head
 
NOLAfishwater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 42
Heres is a smoking deal on an R4. It is the most affordable 4 channel recorder out there. Edirol just had a price drop on this recorder. If you are looking to get quality live recordings you can have the preamps modified.

Edirol R4
NOLAfishwater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th November 2007, 08:39 PM   #3
bove
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 203
Sound Devices stuff is very nice. They just do what they're supposed to do, at a high quality level, and do it correctly everytime. I don't think you'll ever second-guess a decision to buy any of their equipment.
bove is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 8th November 2007, 08:47 PM   #4
tnjazz
Lives for gear
 
tnjazz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 1,354
Are you looking for a mixer or a new recorder?
__________________
Authorized dealer for Avenson, Nevaton and Violet Microphones
Come visit us at http://www.bigpurpledog.com
tnjazz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 8th November 2007, 10:11 PM   #5
leddy
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 226
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOLAfishwater View Post
Heres is a smoking deal on an R4. It is the most affordable 4 channel recorder out there. Edirol just had a price drop on this recorder. If you are looking to get quality live recordings you can have the preamps modified.

Edirol R4
I'm tempted by the price drop, but man - most of the reviews slam those on-board mic pres saying they're really noisy. Not sure how much the Oade bros. pre mod costs, but Edirol claims the R4 Pro has better preamps.

How bad is bad? Anyone know what those preamps compare to? Could you power a ribbon with them, for example?

There has to be something in the pipeline from some manufcturer that will be better/faster/cheaper...at least I hope.
leddy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 9th November 2007, 12:14 AM   #6
springer
Gear nut
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 115
Hey Leddy,
I can speak for pres in these smaller units but not for the Edirol specific...

Even my oade modded PMD660 cannot perform with the average ribbon. I do get modest results with the R122. I am assuming that most of the small form factor units are similar in this respect as I heard nothing good about any of their preamps when I was shopping. Let's just say you would not be happy with the results of any recordings made with the stock preamps. With the exception for (maybe) Sound Devices...
Now as for the Oade modded unit I have - I love the recordings I get with it - as long as I do not max the preamp gain. The "tapers" all rave about AKG c480s so I picked up a pair and really have to say that they are a great pairing with the Oade equipment.
I do mostly jazz and classical. Rockers mileage may be quite varied.

I have to add that going minimal yields some great sounds. Some of my 2 tracks are my favs, far out performing those done with 6-8 tracks.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th November 2007, 02:34 AM   #7
DaveD
Gear nut
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 85
I guess there is a slim chance that some Nagra V's may come into the second-hand market once the VI is released; possibly at reasonable prices, since the price point of the VI is touted to be lower than the 2 channel V.

Bit of a long shot, but wouldn't it be lovely!
DaveD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th November 2007, 06:09 AM   #8
MichaelPatrick
Lives for gear
 
MichaelPatrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 664
Quote:
Originally Posted by bove View Post
Sound Devices stuff is very nice. They just do what they're supposed to do, at a high quality level, and do it correctly everytime. I don't think you'll ever second-guess a decision to buy any of their equipment.
+1 indeed
MichaelPatrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th November 2007, 06:16 AM   #9
Baithak
Gear nut
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Pune, India
Posts: 131
Sonosax??

Quote:
Originally Posted by HarrisKarlin View Post
Howdy,


I was hoping i could get some help.

I'm looking to upgrade from my a bit less than satisfactory Ramko Research "Sidekick", but I'm not sure where to go. I'm pretty into the Sound Devices 302 and 442, but both are a bit weightier on the wallet than I'm hoping for. However, I am looking for precisely that functionality, so maybe I need to bite the bullet. Ideally, I'd like to be working with 4 channels, but given that I'm mostly recording to an FR-2 right now, I'm not going to be able to accomplish much with 4 channels than I can't with 3 at the moment.


Does anybody have any machines they're fond of?


Thanks all.
It looks like you are looking for a mixer to frond end the FR-2 or perhaps record four channels at once?? Your message heading and body are a bit conflicted. In any case, if you are considering something with a four channel front-end AND a recorder or are just looking for a three channel mixer, check out this link from Sonosax.

SONOSAX Audio equipment manufacturer

This company is not touted much in the US sound engineering circles but is one of the standards in the film world and in the audio world. They are expensive but the four channel mixer/8 channel recorder will probably be one of the best combos out there; I have used their pres/mixers and have used their stand alone 8 channel recorder on which this machine is based ... if you just wanted a mixer then please ignore this post.

Baithak
PS: The rest of the location slutz out there should cast an eye on the SX62. I am hoping to get one to replace almost all my location gear ...
Baithak is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 9th November 2007, 07:49 AM   #10
HarrisKarlin
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 11

Quote:
This company is not touted much in the US sound engineering circles but is one of the standards in the film world and in the audio world. They are expensive but the four channel mixer/8 channel recorder will probably be one of the best combos out there; I have used their pres/mixers and have used their stand alone 8 channel recorder on which this machine is based ... if you just wanted a mixer then please ignore this post.

Baithak
PS: The rest of the location slutz out there should cast an eye on the SX62. I am hoping to get one to replace almost all my location gear ...



I am just looking for a mixer, but that SX-62R does look pretty great. Out of my price range for the moment, but I have a new subject for my wet dreams.

I think I'm just biting the bullet and going with the 302. I'm only have 2 channels to record to at the moment, so a 3 channel mixer should do what I want for a while, and the 302 does pretty much exactly what I want it to, how I want it to, and I like how it sounds, so I might as well just bite the bullet and plunk down the change.
HarrisKarlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th November 2007, 10:33 PM   #11
NOLAfishwater
Gear Head
 
NOLAfishwater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 42
Quote:
Originally Posted by leddy View Post
I'm tempted by the price drop, but man - most of the reviews slam those on-board mic pres saying they're really noisy. Not sure how much the Oade bros. pre mod costs, but Edirol claims the R4 Pro has better preamps.

How bad is bad? Anyone know what those preamps compare to? Could you power a ribbon with them, for example?

There has to be something in the pipeline from some manufcturer that will be better/faster/cheaper...at least I hope.
Most tapers send their R4's off to be modded. It is about $325 for all 4 channels and is well worth it. Most people are getting the Busman hybrid mod which is Vintage (warm) on 1&2 channels and then Transparent on 3&4. Pretty sweet set up. PM me for a contact. Oade mods are time tested but cost a bit more than the Busman mods. Basically, Busman is the first person to start modding units in competition with Oade.
NOLAfishwater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th November 2007, 11:46 PM   #12
Gravity
Gear maniac
 
Gravity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 193
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarrisKarlin View Post


I am just looking for a mixer, but that SX-62R does look pretty great. Out of my price range for the moment, but I have a new subject for my wet dreams.

I think I'm just biting the bullet and going with the 302. I'm only have 2 channels to record to at the moment, so a 3 channel mixer should do what I want for a while, and the 302 does pretty much exactly what I want it to, how I want it to, and I like how it sounds, so I might as well just bite the bullet and plunk down the change.
Ok so you're not looking for a recorder, but for a mixer? I have to +2 the guys about Sound Devices. You will never regret buying one. They will last forever, they sound amazing, and you could light the set in a pinch with the glare off the meters.

442's are awesome, and the 702T and 744T top the Nagras for me any day.
__________________
"Very funny Scotty... Now beam down my pants!"
Gravity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th November 2007, 12:56 AM   #13
NOLAfishwater
Gear Head
 
NOLAfishwater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 42
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gravity View Post
Ok so you're not looking for a recorder, but for a mixer? I have to +2 the guys about Sound Devices. You will never regret buying one. They will last forever, they sound amazing, and you could light the set in a pinch with the glare off the meters.

442's are awesome, and the 702T and 744T top the Nagras for me any day.
If I could afford a 744, that is the way to go. It is hands down the best on the market and they are built like tanks. However R4 = $855 and 744 = $4100
NOLAfishwater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th November 2007, 08:56 PM   #14
TheGetDown
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 192
Send a message via AIM to TheGetDown
what about the R4 with an apogee mini-me via SPDIF???? thinking of going that route.
TheGetDown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th November 2007, 09:28 PM   #15
leddy
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 226
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOLAfishwater View Post
Most tapers send their R4's off to be modded. It is about $325 for all 4 channels and is well worth it. Most people are getting the Busman hybrid mod which is Vintage (warm) on 1&2 channels and then Transparent on 3&4. Pretty sweet set up. PM me for a contact. Oade mods are time tested but cost a bit more than the Busman mods. Basically, Busman is the first person to start modding units in competition with Oade.
I ordered the R4 today. I want to check out how it sounds stock, then I'll check out some mods. I'll PM you for a contact soon. Thanks for the info.

If I really need to, I can drag along my Sytek 4-ch preamp. It would be great to not have to bring more gear though...
leddy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 14th November 2007, 10:17 PM   #16
David Spearritt
Gear addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 446
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveD View Post
I guess there is a slim chance that some Nagra V's may come into the second-hand market once the VI is released; possibly at reasonable prices, since the price point of the VI is touted to be lower than the 2 channel V.

Bit of a long shot, but wouldn't it be lovely!
Slim being the operative word. I am going to get the Nagra VI, but will not sell the V, because it is worth more to keep it and use it.

Quote:
442's are awesome, and the 702T and 744T top the Nagras for me any day.
We have a 442, a 702 and a Nagra V. The Nagra V pres are better than both the 702 and the 442, and the ergonomics of the Nagra V are much better than the 702. Its all about talented design. The SD recorders are nice, but they are much more difficult to use in low light in particular but also in general. The menus are much more complicated almost to the extent that you need to carry the manual with you at all times. With the Nagra this is never necessary.
__________________
David
http://www.lodestarrecordings.com.au
David Spearritt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th November 2007, 02:53 AM   #17
maestro
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 166
Manual?

I would love to hear a Nagra in action. However, i bought the Sound Devices 744T (same operation as the 702) and read the manual in one day and know exactly how to work the 744T. I'm not a natural techie but i only own the 744 a few months and would have no need to carry the manual around with me.One of the easiest pieces of equipment i ever worked with.
maestro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th November 2007, 07:35 PM   #18
springer
Gear nut
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 115
Sure wish the folks at SD would put 4 XLRs on that 744... Santa are you listening? ( am I mistaken or do they call it a 4 channel recorder?) I am hoping the site pics and manuals are just incorrect and it actually has 4 XLRs.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th November 2007, 07:45 PM   #19
tnjazz
Lives for gear
 
tnjazz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 1,354
Quote:
Originally Posted by springer View Post
Sure wish the folks at SD would put 4 XLRs on that 744... Santa are you listening? ( am I mistaken or do they call it a 4 channel recorder?) I am hoping the site pics and manuals are just incorrect and it actually has 4 XLRs.
It does, but the second pair is line in only and they are mini XLRs.
__________________
Authorized dealer for Avenson, Nevaton and Violet Microphones
Come visit us at http://www.bigpurpledog.com
tnjazz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 18th November 2007, 05:51 AM   #20
leddy
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 226
Quote:
Originally Posted by springer View Post
Hey Leddy,
I can speak for pres in these smaller units but not for the Edirol specific...

Even my oade modded PMD660 cannot perform with the average ribbon. I do get modest results with the R122. I am assuming that most of the small form factor units are similar in this respect as I heard nothing good about any of their preamps when I was shopping. Let's just say you would not be happy with the results of any recordings made with the stock preamps. With the exception for (maybe) Sound Devices...
Now as for the Oade modded unit I have - I love the recordings I get with it - as long as I do not max the preamp gain. The "tapers" all rave about AKG c480s so I picked up a pair and really have to say that they are a great pairing with the Oade equipment.
I do mostly jazz and classical. Rockers mileage may be quite varied.

I have to add that going minimal yields some great sounds. Some of my 2 tracks are my favs, far out performing those done with 6-8 tracks.
I got my R4 and tested it out. The stock pres are disappointing, as many have said. It may be obvious, but it all comes down to mic selection. High-output mics pair up well with it. My MC930's work well. Earthworks are not quite as good as the Beyers, but acceptable. Oktava MC012's - ok on louder sources. Dynamics...maybe for handheld vocalist swallowing the mic. Otherwise, I'll need to bring another pre or get it modded. I'll probably stick with it stock. I wanted something small and portable. I have an HD24 rig with decent preamps if I need something more.
leddy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 18th November 2007, 03:14 PM   #21
jmarkham
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 713
I've been using my MacPro and an Mbox2Pro.
If you need four mic ins.. then it doesn't work .. but you can get
2 mic and 2 line and it's already in Protools .. maybe even with
markers ;-)

jeff
jmarkham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th November 2007, 03:44 AM   #22
Alan H Chang
Gear interested
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 18
Well, is it still good to send line level to the R4 from the line outs of the SD302? I just might be getting the R4 for 4 channel line-in recorder.
Alan H Chang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th November 2007, 06:20 AM   #23
APOHStudios
Lives for gear
 
APOHStudios's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Upland, CA
Posts: 1,068
Send a message via AIM to APOHStudios
I have been reading this thread with great interest. I am thinking of retiring my trusty DA-P1 so I can get more inputs. I use mine to set up at the house board and take a stereo feed from the board for later syncing to video. But occasionally I find I want more than just the two track, especially smaller venues where not everything is miked up.

So far, what I have learned from this thread:
Edirol R4: good price, but so-so quality out-of-the-box (give me a sound comparison to the DA-P1)
Nagra: Good sound, but $$$$$
Sonosax: Not much info from people. Site seems a bit cluttered, didn't want to wade through it.
SD: Still got to check them out. (Pretty looking but no rough idea of $$$)

Any other opinions or choices? 24/48 is a minimum format for my requirements with at least one channel with +48v

Keep 'em coming!!
APOHStudios is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th November 2007, 05:33 AM   #24
sonare
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: southeast
Posts: 511
Quote:
Originally Posted by APOHStudios View Post
Any other opinions or choices? 24/48 is a minimum format for my requirements with at least one channel with +48v
The one time I used the TASCAM HD-P2 I was SHOCKED how good is sounded. No noise from the micamps, and the A/D wasn't shabby either. This was a classical gig with a ridiculous dynamic range, BTW. Records to a flashcard rather than HD.

If only it had 4 channels!

Rich
__________________
Sonare Recordings
www.sonarerecordings.com
sonare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th December 2007, 06:24 AM   #25
Factory101
Gear maniac
 
Factory101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 159
+3 Sound Devices 702 - once bitten forever smitten.
Factory101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th January 2008, 04:24 AM   #26
Remoteness
Super Moderator
 
Remoteness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 4,918
So, what did the girl do?
Remoteness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th January 2008, 04:45 AM   #27
charles maynes
Lives for gear
 
charles maynes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: out in the dirt.
Posts: 6,154
Buy the Sound Devices machine- then you will be done for a while with buying portable recorders.

they are the gold standard. (at least for the money).
__________________
Charles Maynes

But the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dream with open eyes, to make it possible.
—T. E. Lawrence

Sgt David J. Hart 101st Airborne, RIP 09 JAN 08
Spc Mary Jaenichen 3rd Infantry Div, RIP 05 MAY 08- "Greater love than this has no man, to give up his life for his friend." - John 15:13

"Are you guys ready? Let's roll!" -Todd Beamer
charles maynes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 15th January 2008, 07:49 AM   #28
screamingcatfish
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 228
buy the sound devices.............
screamingcatfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2008, 03:52 AM   #29
Djembe
Gear nut
 
Djembe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 97
Has anyone tried the Edirol R4 Pro? - supposedly improved preamps.
Djembe is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2008, 04:37 AM   #30
jacobfarron
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 278
+5 sound devices. we use them all over the world, and they always perform flawlessly.