Classical guitar recording in my studio - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording


Tags: , , ,

Classical guitar recording in my studio

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11th October 2007   #1
Lives for gear
 
ISedlacek's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Location: Czech mountains and forests
Posts: 3,858

Thread Starter
Send a message via ICQ to ISedlacek
Talking

I started preparing for Saturday, when the famous classical guitar virtuoso Stepan Rak (Štìpán Rak - Homepage) will come here and record (something for my upcoming Mystical Violin CD and also his own solo pieces). I know that it would be much better to record it in some some small church, nice auditorium etc. , but it is simply not possible now. So I am trying to figure out the best setup for recording a classical guitar within my studio room.

I basically found that combining a pair of Schoeps (MK2 or MK21) with AEA R88 may probably bring the best result - either one used solo seems to miss something: R88 the clarity and space, Schoeps the warmth and velvet touch.

Here are few initial samples from my own "sound check". Of course, a beautiful reverb will be added (Bricasti) and my guitar sounds miles below the incredible Greg Smallman masterpiece, Mr. Rak will be playing. So the samples are just naked/dry and contain only my spontaneous plunking (but the basic setup should be ready and decided before he comes)

1) R88 close, Schoeps MK2 wide spread (about 60cm) just slightly behind it (this is the position as David Spearitt once suggested) - Schoeps have more sound share here:

Guitar1

2) R88 close, Schoeps MK2 far behind (about 40 cm apart -as "room mics") - R88 dominates here:

Guitar2

3) Similar as 1) but slightly further away

Guitar3

I also tried Schoeps close and AEA as "room mic" but it did not sound that well to me ...

What do you think ? Would you have any other suggestions ? The idea of the final sound is not a guitar placed in a big space and listened to from a distance as if, but it should be rather intimate approach capturing all the subtle details ("big" guitar and sound).

Of course, using more than one pair (as I did now) may cause some unwanted effects (which I slightly hear in Guitar 2 sample).

So I would be grateful for your suggestions and advice ... (and of course, I can keep posting these new options as well ...)

PS: Here is yet another position, as suggested by David Spearritt in another forum:

4) R88 placed about 1 m in front of the guitar (if placed further away, I feel that it becomes a bit thin plus the volume comes down) with MK2 outriggers placed slightly closer, about 1,5m apart.

Guitar4

The last option (4) seems to appeal to me the most so far .... I played few tones again a added a bit of reverb (just a plugin).


Guitar5
__________________
Ivo Sedlacek

Savita Music
Velvet Mastering
Velvet Sound
ISedlacek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th October 2007   #2
Lives for gear
 
Recording David's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 946

Of these the only one I really like is 3 - it has the right amount of space to let the guitar breathe but without it sounding thin. I think 1 & 2 are just too close to the guitar. Also in 1 & 2 the recordings are quite noisy - maybe the ribbon is a bit too prominent?

I really think 3 sounds nice. You're very lucky to have the Bricasti reverb!

Recording David is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th October 2007   #3
Lives for gear
 
ISedlacek's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Location: Czech mountains and forests
Posts: 3,858

Thread Starter
Send a message via ICQ to ISedlacek
Quote:
Originally Posted by Recording David View Post
Of these the only one I really like is 3 - it has the right amount of space to let the guitar breathe but without it sounding thin. I think 1 & 2 are just too close to the guitar. Also in 1 & 2 the recordings are quite noisy - maybe the ribbon is a bit too prominent?

I really think 3 sounds nice. You're very lucky to have the Bricasti reverb!

Have you listened to 4 and 5 ? I think it sounds the best so far ... No, I don´t have Bricasti ... I will just borrow it for this purpose ...
And you are right 1 and 2 do not sound ideal ...
ISedlacek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th October 2007   #4
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,323

Yes, I prefer 4 and 5, 3 is too woofy and the image is wayward. Getting a stable image of the guitar top sound radiation is very important.
David Spearritt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th October 2007   #5
Lives for gear
 
noiseflaw's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Location: London
Posts: 1,956

Quote:
Originally Posted by ISedlacek View Post
Have you listened to 4 and 5 ? I think it sounds the best so far ... No, I don´t have Bricasti ... I will just borrow it for this purpose ...
And you are right 1 and 2 do not sound ideal ...
The Bass is markedly less 'up front' example Guitar 4 than in Guitar 3.

Guitar 4 is less in your face and still quite intimate, so I choose that, but I would have liked to hear the same piece of music for each example, just concerned about the presence of bass in Ex 4, but you do not hit the bass notes as much...
__________________
.
"There's no correlation between creativity and equipment ownership. None. Zilch. Nada." Hugh MacLeod

~ peace ~
noiseflaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th October 2007   #6
Lives for gear
 
ISedlacek's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Location: Czech mountains and forests
Posts: 3,858

Thread Starter
Send a message via ICQ to ISedlacek
Quote:
Originally Posted by noiseflaw View Post
but I would have liked to hear the same piece of music foe each example, just concerned about the presence of bass in Ex 4, but you do not hit the bass notes as much...
Yes, sorry ... seems I am unable to play the same thing twice - always some "free jazz" ...
ISedlacek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th October 2007   #7
Gear maniac
 
FreeDanny's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: Italy
Posts: 246

i prefer #4
FreeDanny is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11th October 2007   #8
Lives for gear
 
ISedlacek's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Location: Czech mountains and forests
Posts: 3,858

Thread Starter
Send a message via ICQ to ISedlacek
Quote:
Originally Posted by FreeDanny View Post
i prefer #4
Me too ... Actually #5 is the same setting, just playing something different with added reverb (to give it an illusion of a final sound shape) .

So I will start from this position and try few more subtle tweakings ...
ISedlacek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th October 2007   #9
Gear addict
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Culver City
Posts: 405

All of them sound good, depending on the type of music they would be used in. The close mic'd examples sound like they might be more appropriate for pop music, the others are a more traditional sound.

The room, the guitar, the guitarist are all variables that need to be considered. What sounds good today is unlikely to be the answer when the performer arrives with his guitar.

I usually have the performer play while I walk around the instrument, looking for one or two sweet spots that sound appealing. I then choose mics that will compliment what I hear. With classical guitar in a less than ideal room, this often means getting close (12-18") to the instrument with a SDC, aiming at the 12th fret. A LDC is sometimes added above and in front of the player's picking side shoulder, pointing towards the floor. This is used for body. Lately I have been angling the LDC towards the picking hand, distance of 18".

These are just starting points, ymmv. A great player makes all the difference. Have a great session!

Best....H
logichead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th October 2007   #10
hrn
Lives for gear
 
hrn's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: Gävle, Sweden
Posts: 586

I have to say all of them sounds good in their own way. Why not try to have the AEA in the middle and the Schoeps on each side of it in an arrangement where all the mics have the same distance to the guitar. Thinking about phase issues. If the shoeps are omnis keep them close...about 20 -30 cm's apart and have all three about 1 meter from the guitar....Just a guess.

When I record violin I use a pair of room mics in front of the violin and one mic over it pointing down to the soundhole and I have them all at the same distance.

We all know how it sounds when we use two mics recording one source and move one of them....

Hans
__________________
*R1b M343 Cro-Magnon
*U5a Sami
hrn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th October 2007   #11
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: MO USA
Posts: 2,153

Ivo,

I listened without noticing what setups were used, except I did not listen to #5 with the reverb. I chose my preferences in this order:

4 -- I raised the level +2 dB to match the others a little closer. This version sounded the most natural to me. Good stereo image, not overdone. Clean, almost dry, very balanced sound.

1 -- Fairly natural, a bit boring though. Thin compared to 2, 3, 4, but not bad. Was again a little low in volume and bass, since the selection was different was hard to tell for sure.

2 -- Little nasal at times, even sharp & boomy occasionally. Strange/confused stereo image.

3 -- My least favorite. Although the music is nice, and can override some of the objectivity. Overall I thought this sound again had a strange wandering image, did not sound real to me. And too big for an acoustic guitar.


I would suggest as I have before, to consider for acoustic stringed instruments this placement for a pair of mics, even mismatched ones:

One cardiod or omni (or whatever) mic centered at the soundhole, at eye level, pointing straight down at the floor. 6 to 24 inches (15 to 60 cm) away. Another mic (usually of the same kind, but not absolutely necessary) placed level with the fingerboard and pointed at the 7th-9th fret. 4 to 20 inches (10 to 50 cm) or so away for this one.

I move the left and right mic closer/farther to get the stereo balance I want. I always want the gain identical on the preamps. No HPF or pads on anything. I might change the pans in the mix to fit around any vocals or other instruments, as needed.

Steve
squeegybug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th October 2007   #12
Lives for gear
 
ISedlacek's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Location: Czech mountains and forests
Posts: 3,858

Thread Starter
Send a message via ICQ to ISedlacek
Hi Steve,

yes, number 4 (= R88 in the middle and two wide outriggers) is for sure the best starting point. The truth is that since then I have yet dramatically improved this setting by some tweaking, balancing the position (distance, phase etc.) to reach nice, full and big natural sound ... better than posted before ...

I will also try what you suggest ...
ISedlacek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th October 2007   #13
Lives for gear
 
santibanks's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2007
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 682

Send a message via MSN to santibanks
3 sounds very good space wise but I think its just a bit too thin. A bit more character like 2 would do the trick. Some notes are a bit too pronounced.

4 sounds very good too tone wise but I think its a bit too spacy.
santibanks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th October 2007   #14
Gear addict
 
Schaap's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 472

Quote:
Originally Posted by rainy-taxi View Post
4 sounds very good too tone wise but I think its a bit too spacy.
Agreed. Nice tone and character of the guitar but the space doesn't match the intimitate 'feeling'. Ivo, if the setting is difficult you can always add some very little delay(L/R) or only the early reflections of a good reverb to give the guitar some space without blurring or mudding the tone.

Henk
Schaap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th October 2007   #15
Lives for gear
 
ISedlacek's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Location: Czech mountains and forests
Posts: 3,858

Thread Starter
Send a message via ICQ to ISedlacek
Quote:
Originally Posted by Schaap View Post
Agreed. Nice tone and character of the guitar but the space doesn't match the intimitate 'feeling'. Ivo, if the setting is difficult you can always add some very little delay(L/R) or only the early reflections of a good reverb to give the guitar some space without blurring or mudding the tone.

Henk
Interesting ... I would be happy to know about what you exactly mean by the L/R delay or adding early reflections for reaching the "spacy effect" - i.e. how exactly it could be done. It could be a nice new knowledge for me ...

Actually, the present idea is not some realistic intimate sound resembling a guitar player sitting in a room (documentary), but rather BIG, abstract, idealistic sound, like "all pervading" guitar, filling nicely whole space, like being inside ... (I always like it for my music - something like THIS (from my CD Reflections)

And when Mr. Rak is playing, it is truly like a full orchestra, so again - the sound should be very big and spacy, not being limited by the real size of the instrument within a room ... This is the idea ...
ISedlacek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th October 2007   #16
Gear addict
 
Schaap's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 472

Ivo, you can route the amount of signal to taste via an AUX with a delay in the AUX where you set e.g. left delaychannel 23 and right delay 46 or what you like. It makes the guitar sound bigger and wider. Experiment with the numbers and the amount of signal. I like the setting that you hardly hear it but when you bypass you notice that you miss it.

Some Reverbs has an very good first reflections(sometimes with Early refl.) like the higher TC. You can use that with all other parameters or only the reverbtail set at zero.
For the reverbtail you can use e.g. a Lexicon Hall, where you have set the first reflections to zero. So it's a combination of reverbs.
Options,options....

Henk
Schaap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2007   #17
hrn
Lives for gear
 
hrn's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: Gävle, Sweden
Posts: 586

Ivo.
Did you try my mic setup? Just wondering.

"Why not try to have the AEA in the middle and the Schoeps on each side of it in an arrangement where all the mics have the same distance to the guitar. Thinking about phase issues. If the shoeps are omnis keep them close...about 20 -30 cm's apart and have all three about 1 meter from the guitar....Just a guess.

When I record violin I use a pair of room mics in front of the violin and one mic over it pointing down to the soundhole and I have them all at the same distance.

We all know how it sounds when we use two mics recording one source and move one of them...."

Hans
__________________
hrn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2007   #18
Lives for gear
 
ISedlacek's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Location: Czech mountains and forests
Posts: 3,858

Thread Starter
Send a message via ICQ to ISedlacek
Quote:
Originally Posted by hrn View Post
Ivo.
Did you try my mic setup? Just wondering.

"Why not try to have the AEA in the middle and the Schoeps on each side of it in an arrangement where all the mics have the same distance to the guitar. Thinking about phase issues. If the shoeps are omnis keep them close...about 20 -30 cm's apart and have all three about 1 meter from the guitar....Just a guess.
Hello Hans, yes I tried. It sounded a bit narrower than with the omnis more apart (naturally). In the present setup the distance between all the mics and guitar are the same ...
ISedlacek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2007   #19
Lives for gear
 
ISedlacek's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Location: Czech mountains and forests
Posts: 3,858

Thread Starter
Send a message via ICQ to ISedlacek
Stepan Rak in my studio today:

AEA R88 in the middle (Blumlein stereo), Schoeps MK2 outriggers on the sides. Preamps: Forssell stereo JFET. Guitar: Greg Smallman ...

Sounded quite nice in the end. Thank you for all your advice ...

PS: Just found one video of him on youtube: YouTube - INFORUM 2007: Hej okolo Levoče - Å*tÄ›pán Rak An ancore from a concert in Prague (= a Slovak folk song in very easy guitar arrangement )
Attached Thumbnails
Classical guitar recording in my studio-1sr1.jpg   Classical guitar recording in my studio-2sr2.jpg  
ISedlacek is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Classical Guitar Duo Recording Alex Wyler Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 28 10th October 2011 05:21 AM
Classical guitar recording solutions kys Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 40 30th December 2008 12:32 PM
Classical Guitar recording help! Baderup99 Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 6 20th August 2007 10:30 PM
Recording classical guitar - any tips ? ISedlacek Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 44 20th April 2007 03:38 PM
RECORDING CLASSICAL GUITAR paporod Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 1 24th January 2007 12:42 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:55 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.