Post Mixing for Live Recordings - One Session or Each Song Individually? - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording


Tags: , , ,

Post Mixing for Live Recordings - One Session or Each Song Individually?

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 23rd August 2007   #1
Gear interested
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Chi-City
Posts: 18

Thread Starter
Question Post Mixing for Live Recordings - One Session or Each Song Individually?

First, sorry for my ignorance on this topic but I'm a studio cat and new to live music recordings.

When recording a live show, I would assume most peeps just record everything into one DAW session. After you take it back to the studio to mix, do you mix it as one session or do you break each song into a separate session? Then compile it later?

I keep going back and forth on this but I think it would be easier to keep it as one session so you can just roll with your settings, plugs ins, general levels etc, and then just tweak each song based on the performance. I also think it would help keep a consistent tone or feel, since you don't want each song to have it's own sound like you would in a typical studio session. Anyway, just wondering what is "standard."
NorthEnlight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th August 2007   #2
LX3
Lives for gear
 
LX3's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,034

I create one long project, because as you say, you need to work on the sound for the whole gig - doing one song at a time will cause immense problems because every tweak you make to one session then needs to be duplicated in all the others.

My workflow is:

1) Import audio to separate tracks
2) Decide on anything that would be better bounced to a stereo track
3) Get a basic sound happening...
4) ...while you're also bussing and grouping tracks for more control, setting up FX, etc.
5) Then I get in there and edit tracks to remove audio that I won't need. Eliminates spill and saves me writing endless mutes. By this stage, if the band is good it almost mixes itself.
6) More mix tweaking, experiments, critical listening. A few rough mixes checked on other systems.
7) Then start doing automation passes. Not all tracks necessarily need automating - some you can hopefully just leave... which also makes them easy to tweak down the line. I try not to snapshot every track. Just mind which faders you move! Hide the channels you're not working on to avoid disturbing things.

8) When happy, export a 24-bit mix of entire show
9) Sample-rate-convert if necessary
10) "Mastering mode" - new session, apply eq, compression, limiting, fades, word-length reduction, dither etc.
11) Cut final mix into individual tracks and burn CD(s).

Others may work differently of course. This is just me.

Sorry, that ended up a longer post than it was meant to be. Hope it helps.

Paul
LX3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th August 2007   #3
Gear interested
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Chi-City
Posts: 18

Thread Starter
Thanks Paul, I really appreciate the great information! thumbsup

The one session approach definitely seems easier and more efficient.

Cheers!
Jim aka NorthEnlight
NorthEnlight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th August 2007   #4
Gear maniac
 
wyndrock's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Location: Virginia - North Carolina - California
Posts: 292

Send a message via AIM to wyndrock Send a message via Yahoo to wyndrock
do one session. make markers and note times. have whoever authors the master copy make tracks out of the songs so it will have a seamless playback.

that's what we do.

www.redroomva.com
wwwwindrockaudiopro.com
__________________
 Guerrilla Filmmaker | Amateur Screenwriter | Audio Recording and Mixing Enthusiast 
wyndrock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th August 2007   #5
Gear addict
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Location: austin, tx
Posts: 433

Send a message via Skype™ to marty lester
i did a live concert that was also shot on video for a DVD release.
i know you're not talking about that kind of thing here, but keeping
it all in one session was pretty manditory for that kind of thing.

when the editor gave me the cut back, i just matched the window
burn times of his edits to my TC locations of each song and slid
them around as big blocks of audio...easy.

yeah, i could have pre-mixed each song and then moved
the full mixes around even easier, but hey, aren't we
all a bunch of control freaks out here?

good luck,
marty.
marty lester is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th August 2007   #6
Lives for gear
 
The Listener's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,540

I mixed quite a few live albums. For audio (not DVD of the complete concert) I do the whole session mix and then start skipping to different parts of the concert and check general sound and balance of the whole thing, then I concentrate on separate songs and do the submixes for those parts. So at the end - you will end up with one general backup mix... and several submixes that you export/mixdown for the end product. Then take care about editing the applauses, speeches, etc. to make a nice concert atmosphere - I like to cut the applauses when possible and leave them when it is neccesery - long decays of music into applause or a need to show the life feeling... Mixing live performances is an art of itself.
Have fun with it.

best
__________________
"The first question I ask myself when something doesn't seem to be beautiful is why do I think it's not beautiful. And very shortly you discover that there is no reason."

John Cage
The Listener is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th February 2011   #7
Gear interested
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 10

what about splitting the tracks live?

I'm using Reaper and record 8-12 channel mixes live of the covers bands that play in the venue I engineer for.

I usually get the mix onstage sorted fairly quickly, then switch to headphones and start mixing the live recording in reaper on the go, to the extent of mild EQ, compression and setting levels - so that at the end of the show I can render it straight away and burn it to CD within around 10 minutes of the band finishing.

One of the biggest problems I have is the band wanting to get their mix split up into seperate tracks when I give them the CD at the end of the night - but I need to avoid the problem of copying all my mix settings across each track (unless there's a simple way of applying mix settings to multiple session files)
It's also pretty tough to stop recording between tracks and open a new template to start recording with before the band launches into the next song - so is there a better way of doing this?

P.S> sorry for hijacking the thread! :P
BowHouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2011   #8
Gear addict
 
musicguitar's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 306

Send a message via AIM to musicguitar
I usually use a similar approach to that of above, one session, but I put markers for all the songs on the session so that I can reference each song quickly.

Each time I've done this, it's been for a DVD release, but the DVD was not a straight through audio concert. It had interviews that broke up the songs and what not.

However, I had full control over the mix because I am the live sound engineer for We The Kings so I just took a feed from the board.

I like this topic a lot. I'm glad it was brought up.
musicguitar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2011   #9
Gear Head
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 33

What i have done in the past is use the single session file but i start and stop recording between songs. I use cubase and you can set up a single Key command to record so it is a matter of hitting two keys and you have a break. Now this does make the export a little more cumbersome but is can save time in the editing process.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BowHouse View Post
I'm using Reaper and record 8-12 channel mixes live of the covers bands that play in the venue I engineer for.

I usually get the mix onstage sorted fairly quickly, then switch to headphones and start mixing the live recording in reaper on the go, to the extent of mild EQ, compression and setting levels - so that at the end of the show I can render it straight away and burn it to CD within around 10 minutes of the band finishing.

One of the biggest problems I have is the band wanting to get their mix split up into seperate tracks when I give them the CD at the end of the night - but I need to avoid the problem of copying all my mix settings across each track (unless there's a simple way of applying mix settings to multiple session files)
It's also pretty tough to stop recording between tracks and open a new template to start recording with before the band launches into the next song - so is there a better way of doing this?

P.S> sorry for hijacking the thread! :P

Last edited by dingbass; 28th February 2011 at 01:37 AM.. Reason: i can't spell
dingbass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2011   #10
Lives for gear
 
Gerax's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Location: Modena, Italy
Posts: 619

Send a message via Skype™ to Gerax
For live work I usually set up a single long session as most of you guys above do (markers are key). That's also because I use to record a single long session with no stops (yes, I run a backup ).
Usually my work habit is to find a song that lends itself well to get the basic sound of the show. Do some basic EQ, compression, reverb, pan and level settings, get a snapshot of that and go to other points in the concert to listen to how other songs sound like with those settings. If it sound good enough then I'll start editing to get the tracks in shape (e.g. unwanted noises, mistakes from the band etc...). Once I'm done with that the real fun starts.
I like to start from the beginning and set all my faders (I use a PT system with C|8 controller) in "auto touch" and let the music roll, doing my level moves on the go (kind of like "playing" the song). If I miss something I just stop, rewind a bit and go over it. I usually do 3/4 passes per song if there are no major changes in the sound (e.g. a loud rocker followed by a quiet ballad).
I also find that the audience mics play a key role in how the gig is going to suond. I usually do a separate pass (or more than one) to ride the audience mics and make them fit with the mix. Unless they arent really bad sounding I leave them open even under the songs, not only during breaks, just something like 9/12 dB quieter that the program (depending on how hot they were recorded), because they really add to the live feel (time align the audience and PA tracks to the main tracks is a good thing to do to avoid a smeared sound).

Once I'm done with the major level rides I go over each song and fine tune the automation for each passage and level/EQ/compression. How in deep I go also depends on time/budget factors and how the band/producer wants the gig to sound.

When I work for video/dvd projects I really want to mix to picture; to me some levels and panning really have a different perspective when you actually see the instrument or player on screen...I find that I don't necessarily have to push a track up in a particular spot to make it "solo" if I have it clear on the screen. So I always ask for a video file (the higher the quality the better the sync). Usually QT in H264 work well.

Sometimes (almost always) some sort of conforming to picture is necessary...I try to keep the mixes open as long as I can so that if I need to move something around I can do it easily...

In the end, to me mixing live is great fun, I wish I could do more...
__________________
Lorenzo Gerace
L'Acquario Recording & Post
Mobile Recording, Editing, Mixing
Prato (PO) Italy
info@acquariorecording.it
http://www.acquariorecording.it
Gerax is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Live drums on your recordings! drumsonline Work In Progress / Advice Requested / Show & Tell / Artist Showcase / Mix-Offs 2 18th August 2007 01:30 PM
Mixing a live album - all in one session or split into multiple sessions? James Lehmann Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 2 3rd April 2007 04:26 PM
Master each song individually then bring it all together or as a whole album? Big 3rd Mastering forum 8 10th August 2006 11:34 AM
Live Recordings? David Lee Q&A with Michael H. Brauer 1 23rd September 2005 07:33 AM
Live Recordings? David Lee Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 1 23rd September 2005 07:33 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:37 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.