![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
| Tags: mikage |
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2005 Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,520
Thread Starter | at4050 fig-8 frequency response
I'm interested to know if people have found the fig-8 frequency response on this mic to be as tight as the spec sheet depicts? Audio-Technica - Microphones, headphones, wireless microphone systems, noise-cancelling headphones & more : AT4050 : Multi-pattern Condenser Microphone Why did I post this in this forum? Because I'm not interested in hearing how great/bad the at4050 sounds when it's shoved into the cone of an amp [edit: OK, actually I posted it here because I need the fig8 for better off-axis rejection during live recording] As always, Thanks!
__________________ |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 561
|
The issue in this case is not how "tight" the pattern is. LDC's may actually look tighter just because of high-frequency pattern narrowing. But what you really care about in your application is the quality and position of the null. Cheap figure-eights may not have the same polarization and/or tension on the back diaphragm as the front, which can put the null in the wrong place, or cause it to be frequency dependent. I wouldn't expect that to be a problem with a 4050. Plus you see them all the time in Steve Remote's channel lists! My own issue with the 4050 has been that I don't really like the way it sounds on room ambience when you're using it as the Side mic in a M/S arrangement. Way too colored for my taste, so I eventually sold mine. But the sax player I sold it to went gaga over it. David L. Rick Seventh String Recording |
| | |
| | #3 | ||||
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2005 Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,520
Thread Starter | Actually, yes it is. First, let me explain, that by "tight", I am referring to the frequency response within the polar pattern. For my purpose, I want to know that if the player moves off axis a bit (as expected....damn fiddlers Quote:
Quote:
Thanks for bringing it up. Quote:
Quote:
Thanks for your input. | ||||
| | |
| | #4 | ||
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 561
| Quote:
Fiddlers... don't get me started! Actually, I think a figure-8 overhead is a really great technique for a fiddler on stage, provided the stage has a fly loft. (You don't want to try it in a club with a low ceiling.) If you're not fighting a lot of on-stage volume, use a tall stand. The farther away you put the mic, the less obnoxious the sound. Plus, the larger the area the player can dance around it without getting too far off axis. If you must close-mic, ditch the condenser mic and use a ribbon. I'm very partial to Beyer M130's and M160's in this application. Two tricks:
Quote:
Other figure-eights that I routinely use: Rode NT-2A: Good nulls, but wonky random-incidence curve. Can be phasey sounding on orchestral strings, or maybe that was just all the EQ I had to use. Sennheiser MKH-800. Holy sh^t this is a great mic! The best thing I've ever used for Hamasaki-style ambience pickup. David L. Rick Seventh String Recording | ||
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Does frequency response ABOVE 20 kHz really matter? | chessparov | So much gear, so little time! | 50 | 25th September 2008 03:44 AM |
| Analog Frequency Response | Lawrence | So much gear, so little time! | 27 | 26th February 2007 03:38 PM |
| Frequency Response | jcool | So much gear, so little time! | 2 | 7th February 2007 05:39 PM |
| Frequency response graphs for AKG 451EB ck-1 and ck-2 ? | corn55 | So much gear, so little time! | 0 | 9th November 2006 06:10 PM |
| Help!: U87ai actual frequency response? | brutze | So much gear, so little time! | 6 | 2nd October 2006 03:40 PM |
| |