Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording

Tags: , ,

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Need recomendation for mic splitter. Ken K Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 20 23rd October 2007 02:35 PM
Internal HD Recomendation VivaLaVinyl Music computers 1 28th July 2007 04:43 AM
Need recomendation for Stereo Mic holders piano Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 4 18th February 2007 07:10 AM
MIDI controler recomendation geodude Low End Theory 7 3rd September 2006 06:51 PM
OH recomendation??? Sound Chaser So much gear, so little time! 8 6th June 2006 12:53 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 18th May 2007, 02:27 AM   #1
Dusterbd3
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 11
Talking Live Mic Recomendation??

Hey whats up guys? My band is getting our stuff together for playing out and this time around were looking to possibly get our own individual mics for live. Does anyone have any recommendations? Right now we have 2 57's and a 58. We dont have a TON of money but we do know that its important to get quality. Are we good with what we have and if we were to step up our game, what would some of you think. The sound is also a modern rock feel i guess in the idea of a thrice direction. Our drummer sings backups as well, i dont know if theres anything we should watch out for being that hes surrounded by a kit and pulling sound through the system as well.


ant
Dusterbd3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th May 2007, 07:12 PM   #2
tINY
Lives for gear
 
tINY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Orygun
Posts: 6,053

Try the Heil PR-20.



-tINY

tINY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th May 2007, 07:20 PM   #3
Messiah
Lives for gear
 
Messiah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: North West Coast, UK.
Posts: 602
You can't go wrong with the Shure Beta range, great for rock too.

Beta 56's are great for snare drums and for singing drummers due to the compact/unobtrusive size.

It may be a bit boring and obvious, but Shure take some beating...
__________________
Best Regards,
Carl.
Messiah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th May 2007, 08:56 PM   #4
erosconpollo
Gear nut
 
erosconpollo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Graceville FL
Posts: 90
Audix OM2 -- no more expensive than an SM58 but with a sweeter sound and suited to a greater range of voices. Though I do like 58s and use one myself, the OM2 would be my first choice to outfit a band with decent mikes at a reasonable price.
__________________
Enough small empty boxes thrown into a big empty box fill it full. ~Carl Sandburg
The Insolent Lad
erosconpollo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th May 2007, 09:00 PM   #5
sekim
Gear addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 360
You see wireless beta 58's in all manner of big dollar productions and you can get the wired version for $150.
sekim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th May 2007, 10:33 PM   #6
JP Friesen
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 7
Heil Pr-20
I have used them with a variety of singers male and female. They are exceptional. I am sick of the SM-58's and Beta 58's. Just not enough. The PR-20 has opened a lot of ears around here. Big, warm sound and cuts through the mix so nicely.
I need to get more.
You won't regret them.
JP Friesen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th May 2007, 10:40 PM   #7
Pohaku
Lives for gear
 
Pohaku's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 918
Audix OM-6. Sound much better than 58s and reasonably priced. Good on a loud stage (if it's really loud the OM-7 is worth considering). If you want to use condensers (may or may not be good depending on your music and venue), the short list to try is Neumann KMS-105, Audix VX-10 and Audio Technica AE5400.
__________________
Yeah I'm an attorney, but everyone needs a day job.
Pohaku is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 18th May 2007, 10:45 PM   #8
tINY
Lives for gear
 
tINY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Orygun
Posts: 6,053


Anyone who suggests a particular mic in the Audix OM-x line doesn't get it.

Each one is tuned differently and you get the one that works for your voice. It's a bit of marketing hype, but the mics are different and varied enough that it works out pretty well.

If you have phantom power, the RE410 and 510 are worth auditioning too.....



-tINY

tINY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th May 2007, 11:34 PM   #9
Pohaku
Lives for gear
 
Pohaku's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 918
Quote:
Originally Posted by tINY View Post


Anyone who suggests a particular mic in the Audix OM-x line doesn't get it.

Each one is tuned differently and you get the one that works for your voice. It's a bit of marketing hype, but the mics are different and varied enough that it works out pretty well.

If you have phantom power, the RE410 and 510 are worth auditioning too.....



-tINY

Doesn't get what? Well, that's generally true of any mic -- you do need to see how it works with your voice.

I've actually never seen the OM series specifically marketed that way. Can you point me to an example?

I note that impedence, frequency range, sensitivity and off axis rejection vary among the OM line with the higher end models having a broader frequency range, greater off axis rejection and lower impedence. Not surprisingly, the price of the OM line increases incrementally as well as you move to the higher end models.
__________________
Yeah I'm an attorney, but everyone needs a day job.
Pohaku is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 19th May 2007, 05:49 AM   #10
sphereman
Gear Head
 
sphereman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Nashville,TN
Posts: 72
Sure KSM 9 is a nice vocal mic. Have also used it in the studio for vocals in the control room.
sphereman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th May 2007, 05:56 AM   #11
Sounds Great
Gear Guru
 
Sounds Great's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Twin Cities, USA
Posts: 10,917
I've tried a bunch and stuck with my c535eb. I just got the wireless version. Kind of spendy, and worth it.

Wireless microphones, educate me.
__________________

You awake with a start
To just the beating of your heart.
Just one man beneath the sky,
Just two ears, just two eyes.
Sounds Great is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th May 2007, 08:00 AM   #12
tINY
Lives for gear
 
tINY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Orygun
Posts: 6,053
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pohaku View Post
Doesn't get what? Well, that's generally true of any mic -- you do need to see how it works with your voice.

I've actually never seen the OM series specifically marketed that way. Can you point me to an example?

I note that impedence, frequency range, sensitivity and off axis rejection vary among the OM line with the higher end models having a broader frequency range, greater off axis rejection and lower impedence. Not surprisingly, the price of the OM line increases incrementally as well as you move to the higher end models.


That's how it was explained to me by one of their reps a couple years back.... I never really looked at the prices. I need to change my thinking on this.



-tINY

tINY is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0