26th February 2004
|
#1 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Jan 2004 Location: germany-turkey
Posts: 260
Thread Starter | a live condenser mic for female-vocals?
hello every body-
i'm looking for a live condenser mic which can handle high levels
for a female voice.punck-pop-style.
she has got a lot between 2.5-4 khz.
any expierience?
thank you for any suggestions.
|
| |
26th February 2004
|
#2 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Apr 2003 Location: Gävle, Sweden
Posts: 587
| |
| |
26th February 2004
|
#3 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Jan 2003 Location: Dirty South
Posts: 571
|
Although I haven't heard it, Neumann makes a stage condenser.
I think it's the Kms 105?
__________________
If you really want to make orginal results,work fast and cheap,because there's more of a chance that you'll get somewhere that nobody else did.
Brian Eno
|
| |
26th February 2004
|
#4 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Apr 2003 Location: Gävle, Sweden
Posts: 587
|
it's all about the money available...
Hans, www.hagen.nu |
| |
27th February 2004
|
#5 | | Moderator emeritus
Joined: Jun 2002 Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 3,148
|
I've had good luck with both the Neumann 105 and the AT equivalent - I don't remember the model number, but it's the cardioid condenser with a large diaphragm.
|
| |
27th February 2004
|
#6 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Feb 2004 Location: MO USA
Posts: 2,158
|
We've used several live mics, condenser and dynamic --
Neumann KMS105 is a fairly smooth sound, just didn't capture the dynamics like we wanted. This mic performs best with IEM, which we don't use. Even though it is promoted as supercardioid, it is very sensitive and will feed back easily if you're using floor monitors and/or near FOH. I got a great deal on two of them for evaluation, but couldn't love them and returned both for refund.
Audix makes the VX10 condenser, I haven't used it. For my needs, the Audix dynamics (OM series) don't support the male vocal low range enough, and do not have the strong presence peak I like.
Sennheiser E865 condenser (Sting mic) has had good recommendations, might be discontinued? I've used the dynamic 835/845, also a little too "smooth" and laid-back for me, nice sound though.
By far the best live vocal mic I've found is the Shure Beta 87A. This is supercardioid condenser, excellent rejection and GBF, and very dynamic, easily goes from whisper to shout. The cardioid version (87C) has been described as sounding even better, I've not used it, I need the feedback rejection of the tighter pattern. Shure specs say it will handle 140.5 dB at 1 kHz, can she sing that loud?
You sure you need a condenser? I got a kick out of a CMT concert I watched the other night, every single performer used wireless Neumann KMS150s, except for the grand finale -- Martina McBride singing Stand by Your Man. Now I'm pretty sure her husband John (MD/Clair) could pick her about any mic she wanted -- so what exotic world-class mic did she use? A wired SM58, and just _whaled_ on it!
Steve
|
| |
27th February 2004
|
#7 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Jul 2002 Location: Calabasas, California
Posts: 1,142
|
beta 87A...it has a great top end, love it. Some arena type rooms or very ambient rooms with drums directly behind the singer, it may grab a little much IME.
KMS105 if they have harshness in their voice, more around 1k-2k rather than the 2.5-4k your saying...
if they have a voice that you want to really bring out the top end, i'd go the 87a
If your trying to tame the top end I'd go kms105
And as always, it's good to have a 58 on hand, depending on venue, even with IEMs, even though you may have to put on some top end...the mic is amazing for very bad circumstances
__________________
doug
|
| |
27th February 2004
|
#8 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Feb 2004 Location: MO USA
Posts: 2,158
|
My experience agrees with yours Doug. I'd also mention that the KMS105 has an extreme low-cut, it drops off way too quick to work well on my baritone voice, and you really can't do justice to that mic by crowding it, it just won't develop the proximity boost that the 87A will.
So for us, female vocal benefits from the nice highs, male voice likes the strong lows, 87A is just a good all-around mic IMO.
Besides, two of my favorite artists, Emmylou and Richard Thompson (among many others of course) almost always use the Beta condensers in concert, I'll take all the help I can get trying to head to that level of performance
Steve
|
| |
27th February 2004
|
#9 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Aug 2003 Location: USA
Posts: 702
|
I've had lots of success with the Earthworks SR69 on women vocalist. The Neumann 105 and the Sennheiser E865 are also wonderful mics to use for your situation.
__________________
Best Wishes,
GearGuy
|
| |
27th February 2004
|
#10 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Jun 2002 Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,383
|
I am with Dave Martin, the 105 o tthe AT, he is tyhe only guy I have met here who likes the AT 4055...
__________________
Steve Smith - Unorignal, yet commonplace.
|
| |
27th February 2004
|
#11 | | One with big hooves
Joined: May 2002 Location: Earth, NYC metro |
The only way to figure it out is to try them all and see what works best on her voice. This might be one of those times when you need to go the local guitarmart for hour or three on a weekday afternoon.
__________________
J. 'Moose' Kahrs
producer|mixer|recordist MooseAudio.com mooseaudio.bandcamp.com Quote: |
All you need to make a record is a mic, some tape and maybe some bad reverb...
| |
| |
11th November 2010
|
#12 | | Gear interested
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1
| Compromise
Take a look at the Blue enCore 200 hybrid. There is plenty of stuff posted about it around the net.
|
| |
12th November 2010
|
#13 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,867
|
I've worked extensively with the 87, A and C, as well as the Neumann 105.
The 105 is the better mic, and has a smooth, un-hyped sound that may be exactly right for her. The 87 is a fine mic, far better than a 58, which itself is far better than the beta 58. But the 105 is more detailed, smooth, and "3-D" sounding than any of these. The Shure KSM9 comes closer.
As regards the mighty mite Martina, the really great, powerful vocalists do make the lowly 58 sound great. But, that's certainly not what she records with. All IMHO, YMMV.
|
| | | |