Let's listen to some stereo mic's - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording

Tags: , ,

Let's listen to some stereo mic's
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28th January 2007   #1
Lives for gear
 
bongo's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: Pocono Mountains of PA
Posts: 844

Thread Starter
Talking Let's listen to some stereo mic's

I'm trying out three stereo mics. Last night I had my friend come over and play some piano. I set up the three mics as close to the same position at the piano I could. They are right outside the piano about mid way between the body and the top of the lid. So this is the same performance with three different stereo mic's recording it. They all went through two channels of my Grace 801.

What do you think?
Attached Files
File Type: mp3 A.mp3 (929.1 KB, 385 views)
File Type: mp3 B.mp3 (929.1 KB, 279 views)
File Type: mp3 C.mp3 (929.1 KB, 289 views)
__________________
If you can't hear a difference then there is no difference.

redrockrecording.com
bongo is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th January 2007   #2
Gear addict
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Posts: 327

I think A sounds the nicest by far.
The stereo image of C is very different from A. It sounds to me like microphone C is sending a m/s coded signal with M on left channel and S on the right channel.
(?)

Cheers,
Hans
zilver is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th January 2007   #3
Gear nut
 
Analogue Vanity's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Location: Schaumburg IL
Posts: 109

stick with a
Analogue Vanity is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 30th January 2007   #4
Lives for gear
 
bongo's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: Pocono Mountains of PA
Posts: 844

Thread Starter
Here's some short samples of a brass quartet I did yesterday. Same deal, the mics are the same but labeled differently.

So, doesn't anyone want to know what the mics are? If this was the So Much Gear, So Little Time there would be 40 people telling me that the mics weren't positioned correctly and 20 people telling me that you can't make a decent recording with Grace pre-amps!

I guess I shouldn't complain!
Attached Files
File Type: mp3 br a.mp3 (605.1 KB, 195 views)
File Type: mp3 br b.mp3 (605.1 KB, 198 views)
File Type: mp3 br c.mp3 (605.1 KB, 224 views)
bongo is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 30th January 2007   #5
hrn
Lives for gear
 
hrn's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: Gävle, Sweden
Posts: 587

I want to know what mics you have used.

A on both would be my choice. Even though I think it has a bit of treble hype.

Hans
__________________
*R1b M343 Cro-Magnon
*U5a Sami
hrn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 30th January 2007   #6
Gear nut
 
Sound Chaser's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 128

Actually, it's fun not to know the mics...at least not right away. (I guess that's why we are the better forum)
What would be more fun is trying to match up the mics. I like mic 'a' on the piano and mic 'b' on the brass.

I'm guessing mic piano 'c' is brass 'a'

Someone else stick their neck out and take a guess
Sound Chaser is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 30th January 2007   #7
Gear maniac
 
pianoman's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Congrats, first, on making such decent sounding recordings with a Grace preamp.

On piano, my comments are as follows. On this sort of jazz, I like to cut straight to a staccato section (for transients) -- e.g. 0:08-0:12 and a sustain section (for decay, presence) -- e.g. 0:25 etc.
A: really nice presence overall; I can hear the transient decay and the natural "extra" pedal at 0:09 on the Dm7 chord LH near middle C, and I can hear the natural texture near 0:35 going from G7(-13)-->C7(-13)-->Fm7
B: comparatively lightweight, although more presence (in this case, harsh) on the high Ab near 0:10. In general, the sound doesn't "carry" as well. I wish there were more sustain from the G7-->C7-->Fm7 near 0:35, but since I already heard "A" I conclude that the microphone response decays away faster. Similar to my own comparision between AT 4050 (sound died faster) and AKG 414 (mic registered the long decay of sound better) AKG 414 vs AT4050 on Steinway grand
C: in contrast, I'm hearing more hanging on of sound in what I took to be the stacatto section near 0:10. I can hear the extra pedal, so I find it tough to believe there is actual pedaling in these spots, which means the microphone response is different from what I already liked in "A". In the 0:35 section, I can hear sustain between the same chords, but not as warmly.

For brass I won't be as detailed:
A: too harsh
B: too lightweight
C: just right
pianoman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2007   #8
Gear addict
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Posts: 327

My guess would be piano A and brass C are the same, maybe with a Blumlein configuration (a lot more room sound n the brass example) , and piano B and brass A are the same because of the sharp sound.



I'm very curious wich is the piano A mic (s).
Hans
zilver is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2007   #9
Lives for gear
 
lpkyer's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2006
Location: Montréal
Posts: 1,882

Send a message via Skype™ to lpkyer
I enjoyed mic C a lot on Piano...I'm waiting to know what it is now
__________________
lpkyer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2007   #10
Lives for gear
 
bongo's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: Pocono Mountains of PA
Posts: 844

Thread Starter
One mic is a LD vintage tube mic.


One mic is a ribbon


One mic is a $350 SDC


That's all I'm telling you today!
bongo is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2007   #11
hrn
Lives for gear
 
hrn's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: Gävle, Sweden
Posts: 587

When I listen again, I don't like the A's anymore. To harsh as pianoman said.

I Think the B and C has the same vibe and it's a matter of choice both on piano and brass.

My new one:

On piano: C and B are kind of similar but my new choice will be C and I guess that is the LD and the B the ribbon.

On brass: My new choice is C and I think that's the ribbon and B the LD

...and the A is the SD

But, there is something wrong with the stereo image here and there.

Hans
hrn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2007   #12
Lives for gear
 
zemlin's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 658

I like Piano A - wouldn't consider it harsh at all. Piano C is also nice. I'd like a stereo spread somewhere between A&C.

I like Brass C. I'd also expect Piano A and Brass C to be the same setup. Blumlein Ribbons wouldn't surprise me.
__________________
Karl Zemlin - www.sonicartistry.net

I couldn't pick a pocket in a pile of dirty clothes - Chris Smither
zemlin is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd February 2007   #13
Gear maniac
 
pianoman's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Quote:
Originally Posted by zemlin View Post
I like Piano A - wouldn't consider it harsh at all.

I like Brass C. I'd also expect Piano A and Brass C to be the same setup.
Nor did I. To clarify, I felt Brass A was harsh, not Piano A. I like Piano A and Brass C best, and can live with Piano C but not Piano B, Brass A or Brass B.
pianoman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd February 2007   #14
Lives for gear
 
bishopthomas's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,650

I thought Piano A sounded really nice, but I thought the stereo image was too wide. Brass A was very harsh. B sucked on both piano and brass. Piano C was okay, but not anything like A. Brass C was my favorite for the brass recording, although I wasn't completely blown away with the sound.
bishopthomas is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 3rd February 2007   #15
Lives for gear
 
sonare's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: southeast
Posts: 1,512

I only listened to the brass. if the goal is to choose a mic that is good for "classical" brass, then for me it is C. B was marginal, but lacked body. A was like fingernails on a blackboard.

The performance sounded the same (but I only listened once to A & C and twice to B) so I am assuming slightly different mic positions (and a few inches can make it or break it) but the same micpres.

I tried to not listen for the tell-tale increased micpre noise (often indicating a ribbon) but it was hard to not imagine what effect a good room might have, as off-axis response is a fact of life with classical. In fact, the room is often considered another instrument.

In this scenario I vote for C, which sounds to me like a ribbon. B to me is the "vintage stereo condenser" (which likely means SM69, SM2, Schoeps, or older AKG).

Rich
__________________
Sonare Recordings
309 Gloucester Rd
Savannah GA 31410
912-484-8451
http://www.sonarerecordings.com/
sonare is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2007   #16
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: portugal
Posts: 1,140

...

On the piano, the image of A sound open. But, I really like how the C mic sounds. Its frequency response souns really soft. C my choice for its smoothness, and A for its wideness and overall frequency response. I mean, I would use C if I wanted an "old" piano sound. And A if I was going for a modern (wide, clean, balanced) sound.

On the brass, I can hear lots of room sound with mic A. Hi frequency responce on the mic A sounds kinda harsh to me. Im not shure if Mic C is the same mic C that was used on the piano. But again, mike C sounds soft. I would stick with C for this one.

I dont like mic B at all.

Last edited by nandoanalog; 4th February 2007 at 04:48 PM.. Reason: awful english
nandoanalog is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2007   #17
Gear maniac
 
pianoman's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada

My guess is that B for brass is SD (I've never evaluated brass recordings, really, but this is my impression of what SD would sound like).

On piano, I tried SD (Rode NT-5) and all of your recordings sounded more full than my own experience into an FMR. I'd guess B is SD, but that is only a guess.

So, Bongo... when do we get to learn? Or did I miss something in this thread?
pianoman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 9th February 2007   #18
Gear nut
 
MattJazz's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 92

Quote:
=On the piano, the image of A sound open. But, I really like how the C mic sounds. Its frequency response souns really soft. C my choice for its smoothness, and A for its wideness and overall frequency response. I mean, I would use C if I wanted an "old" piano sound. And A if I was going for a modern (wide, clean, balanced) sound.

I totally agree! Piano sounds good!!! Bongo - Did you have it touched up recently???
Sounds more open than it did last year! Is it in open main room or in your both that faces the big pond?

- mp
MattJazz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10th February 2007   #19
Lives for gear
 
bongo's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: Pocono Mountains of PA
Posts: 844

Thread Starter
The Secret's Revealed!

Piano:
A=Royer SF-12
B=AudioTechnica ATM825
C=Neumann SM69

Brass:
A=825
B=SM69
C=SF-12

Matt, the piano was in the small room with both doors open and a very good piano player playing!
bongo is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2007   #20
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: portugal
Posts: 1,140

...

I just knew that the c mic on brass, was the a mic on piano...
Now I know I want a royer. Thanks.

You gotta admit.... I have good ears ,huh? fuuck
nandoanalog is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2007   #21
Gear addict
 
MBishopSFX's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 392

Here's a Royer SF-12 on piano (pianist is Hiromi Uehara). I LOVE the SF-12 or SF-24 on piano!!!


ftp://telmedia.telarc.com/telarc/83631/83631-2-m.mp3
__________________
With Best Regards,

Michael Bishop

Learn why Everything's Better in 5/4!
http://Recording.Pro

Last edited by MBishopSFX; 20th February 2007 at 03:37 AM.. Reason: URL
MBishopSFX is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2011   #22
Lives for gear
 
lakeshorephatty's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,676

Quote:
Originally Posted by bongo View Post
Piano:
A=Royer SF-12
B=AudioTechnica ATM825
C=Neumann SM69

Brass:
A=825
B=SM69
C=SF-12

Matt, the piano was in the small room with both doors open and a very good piano player playing!
Thanks for the clips bongo, i was looking for some on the SM69 tube. Considering renting one and buying. Those clips totally reinforced the interest.

(I know the thread is old : ) )
Russell
lakeshorephatty is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2011   #23
Lives for gear
 
didier.brest's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,124

Quote:
Originally Posted by lpkyer View Post
I enjoyed mic C a lot on Piano...
+1thumbsup (the one that I picked up before having read the key)
didier.brest is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2011   #24
Lives for gear
 
boojum's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2007
Location: Astoria, OR, US&A
Posts: 2,979

Damn those Royer folks, and you too! LOL You sure sold me on that mic. Very natural and open to me. I am a rank amateur but thought that A on piano sound most like what I think a piano sounds like.

Now, how can I afford and justify the SF-12??
__________________
Nov schmoz ka pop.
boojum is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th February 2011   #25
Lives for gear
 
SynthLine09's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,112

I think I need to invest in an SF-12....I love both of the samples
__________________
Wanting to trade some NT5's for an NT4. Would be willing to throw in a little cash or gear to cover the difference.
SynthLine09 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th February 2011   #26
Lives for gear
 
NorseHorse's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Location: DC
Posts: 2,165
My Recordings/Credits

Arrow

Schoeps CMTS 501 v. Crown SASS v. Rode NT5 on Piano

More stereo mics in this thread. I've linked to the post with the stereo ribbon...
__________________
Recording Engineer, Arts Laureate
I-95, I-64, I-85
NorseHorse is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Let's talk about stereo mic's bongo Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 28 1st December 2006 11:46 AM
Stereo Mic's for Acoustic Guitar fastlane High end 32 18th September 2006 10:30 PM
Stereo Mic's Ol' Betsey Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 13 28th June 2002 01:25 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:08 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.