13th January 2007
|
#1 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 614
Thread Starter | Acoustic Guitars - with or without Pickup?
I am gonna buy a Tacoma JM9... should I get one with or without Pickup? I've heard several stories about a Pickup not being good for the overall sound of an acoustic guitars. Any thoughts?
|
| |
13th January 2007
|
#2 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Sep 2006 Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 810
|
It's simple. Would you like to use the guitar live? If so, then having a good pick up is an extremely sensible move.
__________________ Saved. By the buoyancy of citrus. |
| |
13th January 2007
|
#3 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 614
Thread Starter |
Ok, but what about the whole "a Pickup may not be good for the overall sound of your acoustic guitar" type of thing? I think I read this stuff on EdRomans page.. but then again he's a crazy fella |
| |
13th January 2007
|
#4 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Oct 2003 Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 625
|
A under he saddle (UST) pickup can diminish the sound of the guitar when played unplugged, according to some folks. A soundhole magnetic pickup (mag) will rob the sound too, but for different reasons. A soundboard transducer (SBT) will not effect the unplugged sound.
|
| |
13th January 2007
|
#5 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 614
Thread Starter | Quote:
Originally Posted by sdelsolray A under he saddle (UST) pickup can diminish the sound of the guitar when played unplugged, according to some folks. A soundhole magnetic pickup (mag) will rob the sound too, but for different reasons. A soundboard transducer (SBT) will not effect the unplugged sound. | Ok.. so the usual pickup does indeed mess up the sound. Any more thoughts?
|
| |
13th January 2007
|
#6 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Sep 2006 Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 810
|
I bet it has some impact on the sound, and as someone who plays a high end acoustc, I would guess that for the most part it is probably negligeble. Although I should qualify that by sating that haven't done and A-B. Considering the versatility it adds I'd say that it's usually agood idea. Unless of course the guitar is intended mostly for recording, if that is the case I'd try and go for a high quialty clip in transducer of some sort as it leaves you au naturale for recording.
|
| |
13th January 2007
|
#7 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 587
|
Well, it really depends on the guitar and on the pick-up. Fishman, despite making utter crap, do have one really nice acoustic guitar pickup. Its called a "Rare Earth", and comes in a humbucker or a single coil. The humbucker sounds really nice. Other that that one, I can't really say I've ever heard an acoustic guitar with a stock pickup that sounded anything like the sound of the actual guitar.
|
| |
13th January 2007
|
#8 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 276
|
It does indeed depend upon what sort of sound you are seeking. A pickup brings another colour to the sound - not one that I personally enjoy or would make use of, but that doesn't mean you wouldn't. It depends upon what sorts of tone colours you want in your recordings. For the sound of the acoustic guitar (sound moving air), pickupless would offer the best translation.
|
| |
13th January 2007
|
#9 | | Lives for gear
Joined: May 2006 Location: London
Posts: 951
|
I guess the obvious answer is if you can afford it get 2 guitars, one without pickup for recording (your posh guitar), and a cheaper guitar with pickup for live. This is what I do. I've tried quite a few pickups and the best UST (under saddle) pickup I've found so far is the 'Highlander'. The Highlander 2 system also allows the addition of an internal mic. The industry standard is the Fishman Matrix UST...which is ok but can have a little piezo 'quack' to it.
|
| |
13th January 2007
|
#10 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Oct 2003 Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 625
| Quote:
Originally Posted by quietdrive Ok.. so the usual pickup does indeed mess up the sound. Any more thoughts? | Yeah. Spend an hour or so at this site: Pickup Comparisons |
| |
13th January 2007
|
#11 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Nov 2002 Location: Hollywood
Posts: 3,633
|
On one hand, I prefer to find a guitar that works well in the context of a recording environment. In which case, a pick-up may very well work to it's detriment.
On the other hand, if as you've stated elsewhere that you're doing a lot of contemporary pop/rock productions and you may perform some of these parts yourself, it sucks to get stuck in a pinch, where no one is there to press 'record' for you. This is where the pick-up would prove quite handy.
It's a double-edged sword so pick which works better for you situation.
|
| |
5th November 2012
|
#12 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Jun 2011 Location: Seattle, WA |
I say go with a pickup. It adds versatility for playing live, or for running a separate channel when recording while simultaneously micing the guitar. I think 99.9 percent of the listeners of said guitar are just going to tell you whether or not they like the song coming out of it. Plus once you start adding anything else to a mix it all starts cutting into just how much detail you'll hear from that guitar.
As always, just an opinion.
|
| |
5th November 2012
|
#13 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Jun 2011 Location: Seattle, WA |
YUP ... that's right ... somehow I ended up on a thread that's 5 years old and wrote a response to it. UGH. Perfect.
Please ignore me and move on.
|
| |
5th November 2012
|
#14 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Jul 2011 Location: Stroud,Glos,UK
Posts: 1,608
|
I love Gibsons and their slightly distorted pick ups..
|
| |
6th November 2012
|
#15 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Oct 2003 Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,242
|
I have run sound for hundreds of acoustic guitars and have yet to hear one with a pickup that sounds as nice as one that uses a mic.
__________________
Mark G.
|
| | | |