![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| HELP WITH PRO-TOOLS LE 7/M-Box2/fantom rack/E-MU X49 | KeMiKaL | The moan zone | 9 | 12th December 2006 08:26 AM |
| BFD MIDI headache | Herman Munster | Low End Theory | 1 | 22nd November 2006 06:23 AM |
| Anyone using MIDI in Pro Tools? | PRuthenburg | So much gear, so little time! | 2 | 23rd May 2006 02:33 PM |
| midi headache! | jibarosoul | Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production | 2 | 1st February 2006 04:43 AM |
| midi headache! | jibarosoul | Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production | 2 | 1st February 2006 04:08 AM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 306
| Whats good, I thought I'd post this here because I'm sure SOMEBODY can relate to what i'm going thru... I recently bought a Fantom X8. I'm trying to sync my keyboard to Pro Tools M-Powered via s/pdif and MIDI beat clock. Here's how I have it set up: I have the Fantom hooked to an M-Audio Projectmix via s/pdif and via MIDI into the Projectmix directly. By enabling MIDI beat clock on the Projectmix and slaving the Fantom I was able to control it thru PT 7.1.1 on Mac. This lets me play my beats thru Pro Tools and everything seems fine, but as soon as I try to record each track individually, they don't line up. Everything is just OFF... What can I do to fix this?? Any help is appreciated ![]()
__________________ |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 364
| Just a longshot. Many keyboards i've seen with spdif run on 48 kHz. Could be something iffy with that. Does it line up if you run analog in from the Phantom ? |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 306
| When I switched to analog it stopped syncing with the computer. Even when I changed the settings... but even so, my Fantom runs at 44.1
__________________ |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 401
| Maybe your sample buffer is not set low. check your sample buffer. because if you decrease it your lineup troubles are over. 64 ,128, to rec. 512 + to mix ![]() |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Gear addict Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 306
| Quote:
__________________ | |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 306
| Well I lowered the sample rate to 128 (the lowest it would go) and it helped some but things were still a bit off.... i'ma try to do this with analog ins when i get home tonight
__________________ |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Gear addict Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 401
| Quote:
if it does thats you'r awnser. ![]() | |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 306
| I have no clue... gotta check that out
__________________ |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |