![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Cymbals: to clean or not to clean? | Tubthumper | Drums! | 30 | 29th June 2008 05:13 PM |
| Loud mixes or Dynamic mixes - that's the question | shack | High end | 13 | 2nd April 2008 09:26 AM |
| How do you clean a mic? | Beat God | Geekslutz forum | 16 | 11th May 2005 12:56 PM |
| Keeping mixes clean but not sterile..... | Toshka | So much gear, so little time! | 5 | 7th October 2004 06:41 PM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear | Help Me Clean Up My Mixes www.myspace.com/xmandalegend I am trying to make my mixes sound bigger and wider and I am not sure what exactly I am doing wrong here. I am using Reason standalone and I do not want to rewire because it drasticly slows me down while I am working. What do you guys think would help me create cleaner mixes inside of Reason?
__________________ Myspace Youtube Channel Subscribe Now! Sonar 4, Reason 4, Ensoniq EPS, Behringer BCF2000, Roland Xp-30, Emu Proteus X2,Roland Alpha Juno 2, Stanton Str8 60, a lot of vinyl |
| | |
| | #2 | |
| Gear Guru Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: New York City
Posts: 11,231
| Quote:
I have no idea since i don't use reason but in listening to your mixes its a tough call. When people ask the question how do i get something bigger and wider i always respond in comparison to what? What is your definition of bigger and wider or who's mixes would you consider bigger and wider? In listening to your stuff the biggest thing i miss is a sense of space. Everything is pretty much in your face which in certain instances can be cool but i think giving certain tracks a sense of space and place in the mix might give it a feel of being bigger and wider. You won't hear me say go mix on a console or throw it on tape because i don't think its lack of depth based on the format. For some people this an easy answer because you can hear it and feel it right away. I think if you get a better feel for how things fit in spaces but still can be punchy you'll do ok. ![]() | |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Moderator Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Boston,MA Providence,RI
Posts: 10,133
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: North of Toronto
Posts: 821
| i agree also, BUT you will never get the sound u imagine in your head in reason standalone, at least in it's present state. As good a production tool as it is, it has what i find to be less than desireable sound. When i started messing with production, i copped reason, and thought it was great until i started learning about eq and compression and sound placement. When i tried cubase for the first time with some vsti's, it was like i'd been let out of a vacuum. I've never gone back, only to maybe rewire some weird patch i've put together into cubase. So i would recommend maybe conceiving your ideas in reason (because u like it) and rewire into another program for mixing etc. mark |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Germany
Posts: 566
| "Reason is one of the most important tools I use. It sounds as good as you skill level is." eric persing(spectrasonics), Posted: 10-13-2002, 04:14 AM (www.northernsounds.com) and i agree with him. |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Moderator Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Boston,MA Providence,RI
Posts: 10,133
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear | Thanks for the suggestions everyone. Maybe spacing could be helpful because I dont do much panning to my sounds because I am always afraid of over compensating. Are there any other techniques I can use for spacing sounds? I hear eq is ok for that and panning but I dont know what else to do
__________________ Myspace Youtube Channel Subscribe Now! Sonar 4, Reason 4, Ensoniq EPS, Behringer BCF2000, Roland Xp-30, Emu Proteus X2,Roland Alpha Juno 2, Stanton Str8 60, a lot of vinyl |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 255
| rever panning i get, but what about depth? i guess that will be done by using reverb? could some1 please explain about depth in the mix :) |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Gear Head Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 30
| use 2 mono compressors (one for left, other for right channel, improves stereo image) before the last machine. use another compressor, deep compression, start with thereshold about -30 and ratio 1-1.1, helps to glue things together and adds some depth....but yea, after u have mixed ur track, its still better to export it via rewire. |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: London
Posts: 2,688
| I appreciate the previous poster probably isn't a native english speaker, but that last comment makes no sense at all. How can you determine threshold levels if you don't know the level of the signal going into it? and what exactly are you strapping 2 mono compressors over? if it's the mix, use one stereo compressor or 2 linked mono compressors, else the stereo image will be affected. And what exactly is "deep" compression? My contribution? I haven't listened to your tracks, but as far as space goes try thinning some elements out (ie rolling off bottom end from some parts, or turning a part down in the mix and using a mid boost at a particular frequency), definitely using panning (and maybe narrowing the pan of some things - if you've got a massive stereo patch, it may be taking up too much space and would be better not panned hard left and right). Personal preference would be to finish the arrangement in reason, then export or bounce files out for mixing in another application that you can use 3rd party plugs in. |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Yay Area
Posts: 518
| Asking us to judge your mixes off Myspace is like asking Stevie Wonder how he likes your new shirt. Their player is garbage. To me, it sounds like there's some mid lows missing and some mids in general, but this is on my comp speakers so take that with a big grain of salt. The depth you're looking for, though, is a broader range of frequencies. So concentrate on that. I don't think you'll get the sound you want directly out of Reason. The compressor, maximizer, and built in EQ just aren't going to get you there. If you don't want to use Rewire, you can export each track individually out as 24 bit stereo (or mono, if the sound is mono). The trick is to solo the instrument, find the maximum level before clipping, and "Export Song as Audio File." You have to do with for each and every track. For drums, you have to solo the Redrum, then solo the kick, the snare, the hat, etc. separately. Then you'll have a bunch of 24 bit audio files you can import into your DAW of choice where you can tweak the tracks and get them sounding right. Or, if your comp is really slow, you can export each 2-bar/4-bar/whatever verse/chorus/bridge out individually as 24 bit and import those into a DAW and resequence the audio clips. It shoud be less memory intensive but will take a lot longer time-wise.
__________________ http://www.myspace.com/jtwinbeats |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Denmark
Posts: 109
| I´ve been using reason for some years now - even teach reason. It´s a very very good tool for making something happening, but from day one and still I´ve haven´t managed to get a high end sound out of it. It sounds "right" but on the wrong level. (and I´ve done everything: Export stuff solo, going through rewire into protools, logic, cubase using their plugs etc etc). My humble opion on my own stuff is that I get closer everyday, but... Of course it (also) has to do with my skills (working on it) but what stuff did you choose when leaving reason? Same ease of use but better sounding/high end quality?... Soebx
__________________ "Harry! turn up the lights!" Woodstock stageguy "Don't buy a hat through the mail!" D. Fagan main gear: Mac Pro 2 x 3 GHz Dual intel Xeon, Mytek 8 x192, DAV BG. NO.2, Adam S3A, Clavia Nordrack 2X, Logic studio, Reason 4.x, Live 6, Gibson es 345 - TD, Fender stratocaster USA elite, Martin DC-1E, Mesa Boogie MK ll - A, TC 2290, Carl Martin & Emma stompboxes |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: London UK
Posts: 880
| Had a quick listen to the 4 tracks, and sounds to me like 2 main things that ain't helping you acheive space is that you seem to be panning most if not everything up the midle. I ain't got the pnning thing down by law, but few tips when you either got 2 sounds occupying simular frequencies (other than bass) then these can handle little left and right panning to give them their own space. If you got a few sounds playing rythym then again same applies If you got sounds that come in and out the arrangment to accent cesrtain parts of the track, again give a little left or right pan. The other thing i would say could help you're sound is using some delay on some of the sounds and also pan that where the where you pan the sound. Try the same panning tip with any reverb, don't be scared to use more than 1 reverb, different verbs on different instruments can help with the space. Your basic mixing is pretty good as far as balance and eq, so next level is to get familar with some of the above...just don't over do and end up too thing (with phase porblems) or too washy with delay and verbs. A good source for how to balance panning is Dre..he get the right amount of width in his tracks but still sound good in mono.
__________________ "This is what I love about mixing though ...it's never the same twice"! |
| | |
| | #14 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
__________________ Myspace Youtube Channel Subscribe Now! Sonar 4, Reason 4, Ensoniq EPS, Behringer BCF2000, Roland Xp-30, Emu Proteus X2,Roland Alpha Juno 2, Stanton Str8 60, a lot of vinyl | |
| | |
| | #15 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
__________________ Myspace Youtube Channel Subscribe Now! Sonar 4, Reason 4, Ensoniq EPS, Behringer BCF2000, Roland Xp-30, Emu Proteus X2,Roland Alpha Juno 2, Stanton Str8 60, a lot of vinyl | |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 303
| MIX.. Hey, Funny that u posted this.. A buddy of mine just asked me to "fix" one of his Reason songs. I imported it all into Cubase SX3 (which I reccomend as a next step).. then I proceded to use all of my better plugs , UAD-1 , power etc , to get this to the "next level" (i.e. able to be mastered) . I will say that I had a bit of a hard time getting a "proper blend " etc.. I have no idea what it is. But there is something not happenin there. I also enjoy mixing (mostly soulful House).. I will take a listen to your track, if I think i can help you out , i would take a crack at it.. Frankie C |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 665
| Reason rewired sounds just as good as anything else. It's an amazing program. |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Lives for gear | your right it does I just prefer the convience of working in reason standalone
__________________ Myspace Youtube Channel Subscribe Now! Sonar 4, Reason 4, Ensoniq EPS, Behringer BCF2000, Roland Xp-30, Emu Proteus X2,Roland Alpha Juno 2, Stanton Str8 60, a lot of vinyl |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Canberra
Posts: 483
| im no pro or nothing with all this beat making stuff but i think your base is too strong. strait away it felt like, bam, it was right up on me. no other suggestions though. |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Lives for gear | appriciate the feedback all suggetions are welcome
__________________ Myspace Youtube Channel Subscribe Now! Sonar 4, Reason 4, Ensoniq EPS, Behringer BCF2000, Roland Xp-30, Emu Proteus X2,Roland Alpha Juno 2, Stanton Str8 60, a lot of vinyl |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |