Vintech 273 vs Aurora GTQ2mkII - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production


Vintech 273 vs Aurora GTQ2mkII

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 21st August 2006   #1
Lives for gear
 
brian_delizza's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 1,405

Thread Starter
Send a message via AIM to brian_delizza
Vintech 273 vs Aurora GTQ2mkII

I am about to buy one of these two and I was wondering if you guys have any experience with both of these preamps. I am going to be using it to track sounds from my MPC and my soundmodules. If someone out there has an A/B comparison of them I would love to hear it.

Thanks
__________________
www.freqlabrecording.com
www.briandelizza.com
briandelizza.tumblr.com
I make spacey electronic music. enjoy. >> www.optymamusic.com
brian_delizza is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st August 2006   #2
Lives for gear
 
ShaneFontane's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 532

Funny... I am looking at the GTQ as well... AND I have also wondered the difference between both of these pieces... The only difference I found so far was that the GTQ has 3 Band EQ vs 2 Band on the Vintech...

I am sure there has to be more to the GTQ considering it's $1k more, but maybe I am wrong. Anyone have any thoughts?
ShaneFontane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st August 2006   #3
Moderator
 
TonyBelmont's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: Boston,MA Providence,RI
Posts: 15,928



It's kind of like the difference between a Bentley and a Chrysler 300.... Yeah, they're both cars that look similar, but...

Also the GTQ is now mkIII, not mkII
__________________
Tony Belmont

We Sell Gear!
High Profile Audio.....PluginDiscounts.com


I may on occasion talk about some of the products I am a dealer for in my posts.. and that's OK! I sell them because I like them. Not vice versa. It's more fun to talk about things you know and love, then things you don't.
TonyBelmont is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st August 2006   #4
Lives for gear
 
ShaneFontane's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 532

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyBelmont View Post


It's kind of like the difference between a Bentley and a Chrysler 300.... Yeah, they're both cars that look similar, but...
hahaha... honestly though, out of everyone on this board - i am sure you must know the technical difference.

Is it the parts? The board? Something, right? Or is it because they are not made in large quantity?

I haven't met anyone outside this forum who has even heard of it yet! lol

Tony please shed some light as you seem to be the only person that knows so much about this unit.

Thanks!
ShaneFontane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st August 2006   #5
Lives for gear
 
brian_delizza's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 1,405

Thread Starter
Send a message via AIM to brian_delizza
Thanks, and yea I meant the mkIII that was a typo.

I think I am going to get the Aurora, and I am very very excited.
brian_delizza is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st August 2006   #6
Lives for gear
 
ShaneFontane's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 532

Tony (or anyone who has the GTQ)... I have another question about the GTQ...

How would I run the C2 or other buss compressor on it since it has no inserts? Would I just run the outs directly into the C2 and the outs of the C2 directly into the RME?
ShaneFontane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st August 2006   #7
Moderator
 
TonyBelmont's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: Boston,MA Providence,RI
Posts: 15,928

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShaneFontane View Post
hahaha... honestly though, out of everyone on this board - i am sure you must know the technical difference.

Is it the parts? The board? Something, right? Or is it because they are not made in large quantity?

I haven't met anyone outside this forum who has even heard of it yet! lol

Tony please shed some light as you seem to be the only person that knows so much about this unit.

Thanks!
Where do I start...

It's a completely different circuit inside to start with...

But, besides the fact that the actual design is different, the GTQ uses much higher quality (expensive) parts, including higher quality knobs, pots, switches, etc. When I say higher quality, I'm not just throwing the term around.... real Marconi knobs on the GTQ (same as 1073).

The transformers in the GTQ are totally unique and are made by the original Marinair transformer staff (those are the people that made the transformers everyone loved on the vintage 1073's)... The GTQ is made by someone who not only had something to do with the company Neve, but is considered the authority on all things Neve. His name is Geoff Tanner and you can do a search to learn about him.

I could go on & on, but you get the idea.
TonyBelmont is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st August 2006   #8
Gear addict
 
joshelevator's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 486

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShaneFontane View Post
Tony (or anyone who has the GTQ)... I have another question about the GTQ...

How would I run the C2 or other buss compressor on it since it has no inserts? Would I just run the outs directly into the C2 and the outs of the C2 directly into the RME?
it sounds like you need a patchbay
joshelevator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st August 2006   #9
Moderator
 
TonyBelmont's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: Boston,MA Providence,RI
Posts: 15,928

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShaneFontane View Post
Tony (or anyone who has the GTQ)... I have another question about the GTQ...

How would I run the C2 or other buss compressor on it since it has no inserts? Would I just run the outs directly into the C2 and the outs of the C2 directly into the RME?
You would just run the outs directly to the C2 and then to the RME...

Quote:
Originally Posted by joshelevator View Post
it sounds like you need a patchbay
A patchbay would be nice, but there isn't enough outboard gear in his setup to warrant a patchbay.
TonyBelmont is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st August 2006   #10
Lives for gear
 
ShaneFontane's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 532

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyBelmont View Post
Where do I start...

It's a completely different circuit inside to start with...

But, besides the fact that the actual design is different, the GTQ uses much higher quality (expensive) parts, including higher quality knobs, pots, switches, etc. When I say higher quality, I'm not just throwing the term around.... real Marconi knobs on the GTQ (same as 1073).

The transformers in the GTQ are totally unique and are made by the original Marinair transformer staff (those are the people that made the transformers everyone loved on the vintage 1073's)... The GTQ is made by someone who not only had something to do with the company Neve, but is considered the authority on all things Neve. His name is Geoff Tanner and you can do a search to learn about him.

I could go on & on, but you get the idea.

Thanks Tony. I thought those knobs looked familiar! lol I appreciate the more in-depth info. I still feel quite attached to this piece and I haven't even purchased it yet. lol. I will look into Geoff's history a bit more.

Thanks again. And thanks for answering the quick question about the chain.
ShaneFontane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st August 2006   #11
Moderator
 
TonyBelmont's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: Boston,MA Providence,RI
Posts: 15,928

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShaneFontane View Post
Thanks Tony. I thought those knobs looked familiar! lol I appreciate the more in-depth info. I still feel quite attached to this piece and I haven't even purchased it yet. lol. I will look into Geoff's history a bit more.

Thanks again. And thanks for answering the quick question about the chain.
No problem... Here's a little blurb about his work at Neve:

"Geoff Tanner having worked for Rupert Neve & Co. Ltd, Neve Electronic Laboratories, and Neve Electronics International from October 1971 to December 1985 in the roles of Electrical Design Draughtsman, Head of the Electrical Drawing Office, Custom Design Engineer in Sales Engineering, Special Orders Department Manager, Spares Orders Manager, and Special Projects Manager... the last three positions held concurrently."
TonyBelmont is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st August 2006   #12
Lives for gear
 
nukmusic's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Location: Dallas, TX / New Orleans, LA
Posts: 4,667

Send a message via AIM to nukmusic Send a message via Yahoo to nukmusic
http://gearslutz.com/board/showthread.php?t=61405

just for reference..

I love the unit. one more band on the eq would have been nice too.
__________________
.
Docta'J aka Big NUK
Practice Makes Progress
www.twitter.com/nukmusic
nukmusic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st August 2006   #13
Lives for gear
 
brian_delizza's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 1,405

Thread Starter
Send a message via AIM to brian_delizza
Thanks guys I'm definitely getting it....

Since I started this thread I have more questions unrelated to the title, but I don't want to start a new thread.

I am about to make a significant investment in upping the quality of my project studio and I am contemplating the different setups I am going to go with, the pre being one of the items.

Its pretty much as follows:

HD1 system (either 192s or the apogee AD-16x)
Neve 8816
Aurora GTQ2mkIII
Distressor (Stereo pair)
Culture Vulture

and here is what I am contemplating, and your input and opinions would be much appreciated.

I am contemplating having my 002 modded by Black Lion and then adding a Rosetta 800 to get a total of 16 I/Os. If I go with this route I will have to patch in the summing amp come time to final bounce, as I won't have any I/O's for inserts otherwise. This would also allow me to invest that extra money in a manley pultec a big ben (I wouldn't need it with the AD-16x...), and possibly a lot more outboard goodness....

I would much rather mix while monitoring through the summing amp, but there is no possible way with the 002 given its limited I/O. This is where I would normally go off on the steep price jump between LE and HD, but I'll save that for a later day....

Oh the horrible frustration of indecisiveness associated with being a gear slut....

All the while my subconscious is telling me to ditch PT altogether and stick with Logic (Motu interfaces??)

Hmmm... What would you do?
brian_delizza is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Just got my Vintech 273... Fearless1 So much gear, so little time! 7 9th September 2010 06:15 PM
Vintech 273 or Aurora Audio Aurora Audio GTQmkIII? RIZ Records Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production 3 26th July 2006 05:38 AM
Vintech 473 vs. 273 cap217 So much gear, so little time! 3 28th June 2006 09:03 PM
Vintech 273 Brandino221 The Good News Channel 0 20th August 2005 04:48 AM
New Vintech 273 rcn So much gear, so little time! 0 21st January 2005 01:26 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:54 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.