![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 | ||
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2004 Location: Inside my brain...
Posts: 2,254
Thread Starter | Mixing (or not) in FL Studio Quote:
Quote:
Fruity Loops is a great program, I do a lot of my production there and mixing music created there inside of it works great. What I menat by "don't mix in FL" is to say that if you use FL as your daw (with no other app) for vocals and everythig else, you'll be better off using a daw with FL running in it as a VSTI if you're tracking and mixing vocals or other acoustic parts. Overall you'll have more flexibility in a lot of areas including automation. FL Studio was not designed to be a daw. It's a sample based (and midi) production environment. They're adding great daw-like features and it's looking good. I suspect it will eventually become a full fledged daw comparable to many of the light versions of other daws. A user however would be much better off running a VSTI instance in something like Cubase SE or SL or even LE and tracking the vocals and other acoutic tracks there, and mixing from there. That's what I do, feed stems from the VSTI into the SX mixer and mix them like audio tracks. Faders and travel are a lot bigger to get the right level, automation is a lot better, etc. etc. Lawrence | ||
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear |
just the matter of taste... if you do mean "sound in FL sucks compared to Cubase`s" the only thing i can say:"Nope" yes, sometimes working with audiotracks in FL is a little bit uncomfy, but... i`ve just got used to it. Frukt rulezzz b/p! - as I have printed on my T-shirt |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2004 Location: Inside my brain...
Posts: 2,254
Thread Starter | Quote:
Putting it in a shell (any low cost daw) would probably make the _resulting mix_ better. Not due to the sound of FL though. But like you said... it sounds really good by itself standalone. I absolutely love that program. Lawrence | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2005 Location: san jose, califas
Posts: 2,610
|
made this today in fl....bass from the se1, bits from sidstation... http://www.gearslutz.com/board/attac...9&d=1152144566 |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Gear maniac Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 278
| Quote:
if u stayin in the computer, colortone pro on different channels makes a big difference. | |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2005 Location: san jose, califas
Posts: 2,610
| Quote:
i've been looking @ picking up a fatso, haven't done that yet though. how would you say it improves your computer mixes? | |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 278
|
im listening in my studio w/ adams and a sub. there's a difference between loud and full. fl and reason fall off badly when u compare the fullness of the sound to a motif or mpc3000 which i still use as well. synths & drums r super thin. do a comparison to a song thats out and in ur same genre. It took me a few to get the same fullness/thickness i was used to having from an 9000 or Neve console in da box. fatso's and neve preamps help alot on hardware synths/mpc and help even greater on reason, gigasampler. u can also do some wonders if u bounce/rewire out and rock a little colortone pro on idividual tracks. not the same but good results. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Gear addict Joined: Aug 2005 Location: the whole world
Posts: 369
|
hi! all starts with a good sample, thats all! Equal if its logic, fruity, reason etc. Those samples in the Motif and other Workstations were processed over years to get an unique sound. Compression and Eq helps alot for thin sounds. But best is too start with a good sound first. ciao chester |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2005 Location: san jose, califas
Posts: 2,610
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2004 Location: Inside my brain...
Posts: 2,254
Thread Starter |
FL is perfect for fattening up drums by layering 4 kicks or 2 snares but again, I bring those out to discreet daw tracks for mixing. Rendered as audio or playing from the VSTI. I do like some of the FL plugins though like the parametric EQ... that's a nice EQ. It's just that the faders and knobs in FL don't seem to give access to precise level setting (and pan) as I get in SX when I run it as a VSTI. I can get a faster (an ultimately better) mix of the FL tracks as discreet daw tracks than I can in FL. As far as it sounding "thin" in standalone mode? I don't find that true at all... if sounds pretty fat to me. Lawrence |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| two rap mixing questions - vocals (reverb) and sine bass (mixing) | karatemanjohnny | Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production | 41 | 1st February 2010 03:28 PM |
| 24 Tape Machine for Mixing Studio? | bojan_1 | High end | 34 | 24th July 2006 08:30 AM |
| Hi End Mixing Studio in Flat possible??? | Andi Rauscher | High end | 12 | 18th March 2006 06:31 AM |
| Studio Mixing Cost? | rastanot | So much gear, so little time! | 17 | 18th August 2005 07:36 AM |
| Need studio space for mixing in NNJ | stereomixer | So much gear, so little time! | 0 | 10th March 2005 09:24 AM |
| |