12th May 2012
|
#1 | | Gear nut
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 79
Thread Starter | Wise UPGRADE or NOT
Recording Rap HELP Would it be wise to upgrade
Right Now
c414b-uls.
avalon 737
distressor
mbox 3 pro
A friend of mine is selling a rosetta 200 should I grab it for my set up
Will it improve my conversion and hold up in the long run
|
| |
12th May 2012
|
#2 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2004 Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,388
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.GrinchSD Recording Rap HELP Would it be wise to upgrade
Right Now
c414b-uls.
avalon 737
distressor
mbox 3 pro
A friend of mine is selling a rosetta 200 should I grab it for my set up
Will it improve my conversion and hold up in the long run | I really like mine on vox especially. Tried the Apollo out and returned it. About to sell it and get the 8 ch version. I hope that i do not miss the additional features too much. Have a bit of outboard gear and was doing more patching than I wanted to. At 96 - 192k I think you will be able to use it as long as you want to.
|
| |
12th May 2012
|
#3 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Feb 2010 Location: NYC/LA
Posts: 1,636
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.GrinchSD Recording Rap HELP Would it be wise to upgrade
Right Now
c414b-uls.
avalon 737
distressor
mbox 3 pro
A friend of mine is selling a rosetta 200 should I grab it for my set up
Will it improve my conversion and hold up in the long run | IMHO, don't do it. It's a lateral move that will not improve your conversion and more than likely will cause issues with pro tools that are not there with the integrated avid hardware. The mbox pro 3 has very good conversion.
|
| |
12th May 2012
|
#4 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2007 Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 1,304
| Quote:
Originally Posted by PopularDemand IMHO, don't do it. It's a lateral move that will not improve your conversion and more than likely will cause issues with pro tools that are not there with the integrated avid hardware. The mbox pro 3 has very good conversion. | woah idk, I've only used an mbox3 a few times and I don't own one... but i've always been VERY impressed with the rosetta conversion. But whats your monitoring setup? Room treatment?
|
| |
12th May 2012
|
#5 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2004 Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,388
| Quote:
Originally Posted by PopularDemand IMHO, don't do it. It's a lateral move that will not improve your conversion and more than likely will cause issues with pro tools that are not there with the integrated avid hardware. The mbox pro 3 has very good conversion. | That is an interesting take on the situation. I just assumed he would using WITH the MBox via digital i/o or somethng, not replace it entirely.
Pop D has a good argument, if you are replacing one with the other. I use mine as a standalone fed one of a couple of soundcards via digital i/o. I retain driver stability and compatibility. Using an Apogee FW interface with PT, is something I can not speak on.
It sounds good though... The soft limiting on drums when finsessed correctly....man  It usually gets chosen over my other conversion options for that purpose alone.
|
| |
12th May 2012
|
#6 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Feb 2010 Location: NYC/LA
Posts: 1,636
| Quote:
Originally Posted by jeremycox woah idk, I've only used an mbox3 a few times and I don't own one... but i've always been VERY impressed with the rosetta conversion. But whats your monitoring setup? Room treatment? | Mbox 3 Pro has better converters than mbox 3. I use it on the road. I used to have a rosetta 800 years ago. It's a lateral move to me.
My current room is NS10's, Barefoot MM27's, Griffin G1.5 mains w LFE 15 sub in a Francis Manzella designed room.
|
| |
12th May 2012
|
#7 | | Gear nut
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 79
Thread Starter |
Thanks for the input I think Im gonna just buy it and if i don't think its worth It i can always re sell it.
And ya I'm not going to replace the mbox I'm gonna run the rosetta through it
|
| |
12th May 2012
|
#8 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2004 Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,388
|
@Pop D
I have read that the 200 (192k) has better conversion than the 800, supported by the fact that it came on the market a bit later. My understanding it that it has to do with the filtering circuit, analog stages, and the chips. I don't have the 800 yet, but when I get it, I will crack it open to confirm at least the chips. Hopefully its not a step too far backwards... or I will be quite salty. LOL
|
| |
12th May 2012
|
#9 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Feb 2010 Location: NYC/LA
Posts: 1,636
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.GrinchSD And ya I'm not going to replace the mbox I'm gonna run the rosetta through it | One issue you will have to deal with is that latest version of Pro Tools does not have a 3rd party converter offset box. Avid is diabolical with these things. So the added converter latency when using the rosetta will be a problem. Record Offset for 3rd Party Hardware? WTF!! Quote:
Originally Posted by jrides @Pop D
I have read that the 200 (192k) has better conversion than the 800, supported by the fact that it came on the market a bit later. My understanding it that it has to do with the filtering circuit, analog stages, and the chips. I don't have the 800 yet, but when I get it, I will crack it open to confirm at least the chips. Hopefully its not a step too far backwards... or I will be quite salty. LOL | That's possible. The mbox 3 Pro is also derived from newest converter tech used in new Avid I/O's which are excellent. At this level it's all a matter of taste. I just stated if it was me I would be happy with mbox 3 Pro. I would spend the $ on something else especially given that Avid is throwing up road blocks for 3rd party integration.
|
| |
12th May 2012
|
#10 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2011 Location: Boogie Down
Posts: 1,029
| Quote:
Originally Posted by jrides I really like mine on vox especially. Tried the Apollo out and returned it. About to sell it and get the 8 ch version. I hope that i do not miss the additional features too much. Have a bit of outboard gear and was doing more patching than I wanted to. At 96 - 192k I think you will be able to use it as long as you want to. | Dam you returned the apollo. Whys that?
|
| |
12th May 2012
|
#11 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2004 Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,388
|
I agree that many converters are better than before. I have heard good things about recent Avid boxes
|
| |
12th May 2012
|
#12 | | Gear nut
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 79
Thread Starter |
So are yo saying It will not work with pro tool 10
|
| |
12th May 2012
|
#13 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Jul 2010 Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 267
| Quote:
Originally Posted by jrides I really like mine on vox especially. Tried the Apollo out and returned it. About to sell it and get the 8 ch version. I hope that i do not miss the additional features too much. Have a bit of outboard gear and was doing more patching than I wanted to. At 96 - 192k I think you will be able to use it as long as you want to. | What didn't you like about the Apollo? I'm thinking about getting one. I have a 003r now.
Sorry about the thread hijack lol
|
| |
12th May 2012
|
#14 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,164
|
There is an MBOX 3 vs Apogee & others converters comparison on the Avid website. Make you sure you have a look at that first. The MBOX 3 pro is excellent sound quality wise. Why do you feel its stopping you from making dope beats?
|
| |
12th May 2012
|
#15 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2004 Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,388
| Quote:
Originally Posted by eldorado_p What didn't you like about the Apollo? I'm thinking about getting one. I have a 003r now.
Sorry about the thread hijack lol | If you want/need the plugs, get it. It is not bad and wont hold you back. As Pop D suggests about the MBox 3 pro the converters are pretty good these days after a certain point. A matter of taste.
I didn't find them to be an upgrade at all. In fact I found myself using more plugs to compensate for the difference. Especially on drums I found myself wanting to retrack with the Rosetta 200. I like how R200 handles low/ mids and the highest highs.
Keep in mind I can live without the UA plugs. If you can't you will still be able to mix a good record on the Apollo. Might be a step up from the Digi box.
|
| |
12th May 2012
|
#16 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Jul 2010 Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 267
| Quote:
Originally Posted by jrides If you want/need the plugs, get it. It is not bad and wont hold you back. As Pop D suggests about the MBox 3 pro the converters are pretty good these days after a certain point. A matter of taste.
I didn't find them to be an upgrade at all. In fact I found myself using more plugs to compensate for the difference. Especially on drums I found myself wanting to retrack with the Rosetta 200. I like how R200 handles low/ mids and the highest highs.
Keep in mind I can live without the UA plugs. If you can't you will still be able to mix a good record on the Apollo. Might be a step up from the Digi box. | Cool thx for the input
|
| |
12th May 2012
|
#17 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2007 Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 1,304
|
Shit i didn't realize they updated the mbox again.
|
| |
12th May 2012
|
#18 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2004 Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,388
| Quote:
Originally Posted by jeremycox Shit i didn't realize they updated the mbox again. | Yeah this is like the 3rd or 4th time I saw a good word on the Mbox 3 Pro, on and offline. I hear the 192 joint by Avid was quite decent as well.
|
| |
12th May 2012
|
#19 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2007 Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 1,304
| Quote:
Originally Posted by jrides Yeah this is like the 3rd or 4th time I saw a good word on the Mbox 3 Pro, on and offline. I hear the 192 joint by Avid was quite decent as well. | It's been a few years since I gave avid any of my money. Their service was always awful when I worked with them.
|
| |
8th July 2012
|
#20 | | Gear nut
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 79
Thread Starter |
For real Avid costumer service is not good i tried to get ahold of them once NOT HAPPENING. Any way I got the rosetta not really sure how much my sound improved BUT WHATEVER I got converters covered now. And I wanna do analog mixing pretty soon and thats probably not the best to do with the mbox alone YOU FEEL ME!!!
|
| |
8th July 2012
|
#21 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2007 Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 1,304
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.GrinchSD For real Avid costumer service is not good i tried to get ahold of them once NOT HAPPENING. Any way I got the rosetta not really sure how much my sound improved BUT WHATEVER I got converters covered now. And I wanna do analog mixing pretty soon and thats probably not the best to do with the mbox alone YOU FEEL ME!!! | Cool, the Rosetta is a great piece of gear
|
| | | |