![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dynaudio BM5 vs. Krk v8 vs. Something else? | deathman | So much gear, so little time! | 11 | 9th September 2006 04:28 AM |
| passive DI or active DI ? | musicsound-2 | So much gear, so little time! | 10 | 16th May 2006 10:40 PM |
| I say passive Dynaudio BM5's and I want active, better ones.. and you say? | Mitch Lowen | So much gear, so little time! | 21 | 2nd February 2006 09:09 PM |
| Passive Dynaudio BM5's vs. Active KRK RP6's | Mitch Lowen | So much gear, so little time! | 4 | 31st January 2006 11:25 PM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 138
| Passive Dynaudio BM5 vs. Active KRK RP6 Yes yes y'all, Aight. I use Dynaudio BM5's w/ a Samson Server 100 pre-amp. I'm thinking of investing in new monitors. My dillema: The acoustics in my room suck. See picture. I'm going to work on 'fixing' the problems with the acoustics tho. Curtain in front of the wall with the window. Speakersstands. Moving the mixer to exactly the middle of the wall. Couch opposite of speakers. Now.. someone told me: the Dynaudio BM5's have more detail than the RP6's. My whole PROBLEM with the BM5's is the lack of detail. But.. it could be acoustic-related. I do hear people saying 'active is better than passive'. Is this fact. What do u guys think?? ![]() ![]() |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Springfield,MA
Posts: 74
| the rp6's are good and the mixes on them translate very well to other systems get some kind of frequency response test of ur room to see where u have tostart working and i see the walls have nothing on it at all so it mean u have lots of reverb ? when u scream in ur room can u hear some kind of echo or it sounds dry |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |