![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 158
Thread Starter | What are the standards?
For rap and r&b, list the top three of each to be official. thumbsup no budget Mics Mic Pre for vocals Mic Pre/DI's for MPC/Motif/Triton/Fantom X Compressors EQ's and plugins
__________________ OUT |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2002 Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 3,856
|
Standards? These are probably the most used: Mics - U87, Shure 57/58,SM7, Sony C800G Mic Pre - Avalon 737sp, Neve 1073, whatever is built into your interface/mixer/or is cheap DI for synths/mpcs - Avalon, API, whataver has a 1/4" jack EQs - SSL 4000 (depends on which board), Neve 1073, Avalon, plugin. Plugins - If using Protools, Bombfactory stuff, autotune, vocalign. Native - UAD, autotune. --------------------------- I'll just add compression: 1176, Distressor, SSL, Dbx 160 (or one of its siblings) |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Moderator Joined: Feb 2004 Location: Boston,MA Providence,RI
Posts: 15,924
|
Not really in any specific order... Mics - U87, Shure 57/58,SM7, Sony C800G Mic Pre - Avalon 737sp(though I can't stand it), Neve family, API DI for synths/mpcs - Aurora Audio GTQ, API, Desk Doctor EQs - SSL, Neve family, API Compressors: Distressor, Dbx 160, Smart C2/ SSL G384, (honorable mention: 1176 and LA2a type compressors)
__________________ Tony Belmont ![]() We Sell Gear! ![]() High Profile Audio.....PluginDiscounts.com I may on occasion talk about some of the products I am a dealer for in my posts.. and that's OK! I sell them because I like them. Not vice versa. It's more fun to talk about things you know and love, then things you don't. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 158
Thread Starter | The New Hip-Hop and R&B Standard 2006 and beyond
The reason why I asked the question is because,I will be doing some major upgrades to my setup in the coming months. A new vocal mic, and mic pres for the 4000 and motif. etc So if you have to start over, what would you get? Lets start the new standard for 2006 and beyond. Right now my set up is: Blue Blueberry (I think I need something better, a tube mic) Great River MEQ-1NV (sweet) FMR RNLA (need something better) Digi 002R (can't afford HD) KRK V6 series 2 |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Gear Guru Joined: Jun 2002 Location: New York City
Posts: 14,177
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Sep 2005 Location: hell, michigan
Posts: 2,797
| Quote:
another "standard" is the sansamp PSA-1... just ask RZA. you might wanna toss in an eventide too.. i hear that micro pitch shift/spread thing all the time...
__________________ 3WO - Mixing Without Tears "Some think I should teach men the way to heaven. But I would rather teach them the way to hell so they'll know how to go around it..." -- Niccolo Machiavelli | |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear |
The next question would be .............what works in place of the "standards"?? |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| Gear interested Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 27
|
Sorry for hijacking the thread, but this is kinda related... Is it possible to track R&B vocals without compression, and just get it done during mixdown ? Since we have so much headroom to play with anyways these days, is splurging in an expensive compressor really necessary during the tracking phase ? -sunrck Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Moderator Joined: Feb 2004 Location: Boston,MA Providence,RI
Posts: 15,924
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2004 Location: Inside my brain...
Posts: 2,254
| Quote:
IMHO this gives the most flexibility during mixing. You can squash the hell out of it or lightly compress it or don't touch it and use automation to make every word clear. When I sit down to mix I want to hear it exactly as it was during the performance, dynamics and all. If I need a more warm analog sound I count on the mic/pre combination to get that done. I personally think vocal (singing) compression is best left for the mixing stage. With 24-bits you should never be approaching clipping anyway. If you are you're tracking too hot. With that said... Circumstances differ. If you have a special analog comp that you want to use for "character" on a vocal that will be going to digital disk, and you don't want to add another DA/AD stage to insert that comp later then by all means use it during tracking. Just be aware that if the singer goes really (unexpectedly) loud on a bridge or something and gets radically compressed (your 4db of comp is now 8db) it's there to stay. If you use a comp during tracking record a uncomped split just in case. Splurging on an expensive comp? That's a personal choice. I personaly feel that much of the equipment we lust after isn't "necessary" but a lot of it can make a big difference in the right hands. A $250,000 Neve console 'aint neccesary but I sure would love one! Lawrence | |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Patchbay standards ? | SK1 | High end | 9 | 1st March 2006 01:13 PM |
| standards for DB-25 terminated cables | David Rick | Geekslutz forum | 6 | 13th November 2005 01:01 PM |
| Question about playback formats and standards | the1Hub | Chuck Ainlay, Ed Cherney, Frank Filipetti, George Massenburg, Elliot Scheiner, Al Schmitt | 4 | 10th November 2005 12:32 AM |
| Old School Standards - please critique | quartermoonpro | Work In Progress / Advice Requested / Show & Tell / Artist Showcase / Mix-Offs | 2 | 11th September 2004 03:43 AM |
| |