Unofficial remixes with "official" quality -- the limiting stage - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production


Unofficial remixes with "official" quality -- the limiting stage

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 29th December 2008   #1
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,351

Thread Starter
Unofficial remixes with "official" quality -- the limiting stage

So you splice the instrumental into the song, and record your own vocals onto it.

You mix your vocals to sound like a perfect match with the existing vocals (from the original song).

Last step after the "mix" is mastering.

However, the song has already been mastered -- so you don't want to change anything.

What you do want to do is put a limiter on master bus so that the there's no limiting occurring during the original song, but when it hits your new parts, it limits them to bring the overall volume level at the same overall RMS as the original song.

Do you recommend I limit the vocal bus (without the inst) first, and then have another limiter on the master bus to just do the tiniest bit of trimming (in order to maintain the same volume of the original)?

Any tips?

I don't want the limiter to be affecting the song except where I've added vocals. Everything else shouldn't hit the threshold, and therefore be unchanged from the original master.

Thoughts?

I've bought the Sony Oxford Limiter, so that'll be my weapon.
I've done this before with good results, but I figured it wouldn't hurt to open the discussion in case there's some logic I've missed.
coyotekells is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th December 2008   #2
Lives for gear
 
jikky's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: Triple D!!! Dallas/Houston, Tx
Posts: 1,170

Send a message via AIM to jikky
I put the limiter on the vocal bus to touch it a tad bit. Use the enhance slider on the vox bus. On the master bus put the limiter and set the output to .0008 to prevent overs. Input at 0. Leave the other sliders at default. On the master you're just preventing overs coming from the mix of the instrumental and vox bus. You're really just mixing the vocals so mix them as normal and send em to their own bus to be limited and use the master bus to prevent overs. Goodluck
jikky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th December 2008   #3
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,613

same answer as here

Limiting Causing Low-end Issues on Mixtape Tracks..
computa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th December 2008   #4
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,351

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by jikkyboy11 View Post
I put the limiter on the vocal bus to touch it a tad bit. Use the enhance slider on the vox bus. On the master bus put the limiter and set the output to .0008 to prevent overs. Input at 0. Leave the other sliders at default. On the master you're just preventing overs coming from the mix of the instrumental and vox bus. You're really just mixing the vocals so mix them as normal and send em to their own bus to be limited and use the master bus to prevent overs. Goodluck
Thanks, but you missed an important point. I need to set the input until it's hitting the limiter during the original portions of the song, and then back off so it's not. Then when it hits my new vocals, it will limit those areas and the whole song will peak at .008

I was thinking more a long the lines of -- is there things I should consider doing differently in the attack/release section, since i'm essentially just squashing the vocals flat onto the already slammed instrumental.
coyotekells is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th December 2008   #5
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,351

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by computa View Post
I'll check out your settings next time I do this.. see how they treat me

As explained in my response to jikky, my logic is to bring the limiter so it's just about to hit the song, but no reduction.. then when my new vocals come, it will squash those parts to the same peak as the original song.. thus giving me the full amplitude of the original release (and no more!).

I don't have a problem with mud or things sounding squashed.

I just thought I'd post to see what the other opinions are on this, as I'm not a pro.

Btw, Sonnox really is working nicer than my previous limiter for this sort of thing!!
coyotekells is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th December 2008   #6
Lives for gear
 
jikky's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: Triple D!!! Dallas/Houston, Tx
Posts: 1,170

Send a message via AIM to jikky
Quote:
Originally Posted by coyotekells View Post
Thanks, but you missed an important point. I need to set the input until it's hitting the limiter during the original portions of the song, and then back off so it's not. Then when it hits my new vocals, it will limit those areas and the whole song will peak at .008

I was thinking more a long the lines of -- is there things I should consider doing differently in the attack/release section, since i'm essentially just squashing the vocals flat onto the already slammed instrumental.

I see where your going. The enhance slider has features of the sonnox inflator which increases the percieved volume. My process is to add my URS CSP on the inserts to comp there. Send it to the vocal group and use the enhance on the sonnox limiter or actually use the sonnox inflator to bring up the volume, but yea I guess I got that all wrong. Limit the vocal bus and not the master so u dont squash the track with the vocals since the instrumental track is already squashed.
jikky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th December 2008   #7
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,351

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by jikkyboy11 View Post
I see where your going. The enhance slider has features of the sonnox inflator which increases the percieved volume. My process is to add my URS CSP on the inserts to comp there. Send it to the vocal group and use the enhance on the sonnox limiter or actually use the sonnox inflator to bring up the volume, but yea I guess I got that all wrong. Limit the vocal bus and not the master so u dont squash the track with the vocals since the instrumental track is already squashed.
If you play the instrumental track and bring it so it's hitting -0.1 or so on the master, then the limiter isn't hitting the instrumental at all (if you're using Sonnox, then technically, it is still affecting the instrumental if you have Safe Mode engaged or if you're using Enhance). As soon as your vocals come on, the limiter will start gain reduction, probably hitting anywhere from 1 - 3db.

Btw, I know the manual says that, but the Enhance section in the Limiter is NOT at all the same as the Inflator.
There has been a lot of discussion about these plugs on GS, and the original author is really annoyed about this error in the manual because he's had to clarify so many times. They are NOT the same. Just thought I'd let you know, cause I was happy to learn the truth about that (even tho the details are hard for someone like me to decipher)
coyotekells is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2009   #8
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,351

Thread Starter
which is the lesser of my 2 evils - room and gear, or mixing technique?

Of course, it's all speculation, but:

Listening to this remix, what do you suspect makes the greatest impact on the difference in our vocal mix (including aspects like room and mic proximity)? Or do you think it's the mix of the vocals (including the fact mine are added to the already limited instrumental, rather than mixed as "part of the song").

Paula DeAnda - Easy (Feat. Lil' Wayne & St. Kelly) - zshare.net

Wayne was no doubt recorded in a good room, through some typical pop chain like 800g -> CL1B -> 1073.

Mine was $200 mic -> Pacifica (with no hardware comp). So there's some short comings there, and the room is much less than desirable :/
Is that the bigger of my problems, or is it the mixing stage that requires the more immediate improvement?

Thanks for the critique/suggestions...
coyotekells is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2009   #9
Lives for gear
 
Nahuel's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,441

Why bother? It's jus mixtape stuff... you'll never be able to make your vocals sound like the original artist for a lot of obvious reasons. Btw Jikky technique aint that bad: the limiter on the 2buss can kinda glue your vocals with the original track.
__________________
Youtube - SoundCloud
Nahuel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2009   #10
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,351

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by lpuma View Post
Why bother? It's jus mixtape stuff... you'll never be able to make your vocals sound like the original artist for a lot of obvious reasons. Btw Jikky technique aint that bad: the limiter on the 2buss can kinda glue your vocals with the original track.
Thanks. Btw, the limiter on the 2 buss is an obvious move.. that's why that "technique" is outlined in the original post
coyotekells is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2009   #11
Lives for gear
 
jikky's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: Triple D!!! Dallas/Houston, Tx
Posts: 1,170

Send a message via AIM to jikky
Here's a screenshot of what you could possibly make it look like. I have inflator on the vocal bus and the limiter on the master bus. And the input on the limiter is at 0. So basically on the 2bus I'm only catching the peaks. No real limiting but I did use the enhance function and that did something I liked.



Unofficial remixes with "official" quality -- the limiting stage-mix.jpg
jikky is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
It's Official "ALL MCI Studio" Is Complete Demonslave High end 15 8th December 2008 07:06 PM
Favorite "High End" quality but "Low End" price piece of gear? Sacalait High end 123 26th November 2008 02:02 AM
How "official" does a contract need to be when purchasing beats? Neruk Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production 13 12th May 2007 05:28 PM
A "Pro/Quality" Mix along the lines of Sterling "after hours"... Liam Judah High end 4 20th September 2005 12:12 AM
The Official AES "Check This Out" Thread David R. So much gear, so little time! 27 2nd November 2004 07:41 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:33 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.