![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2007 Location: Canada
Posts: 1,351
Thread Starter | Unofficial remixes with "official" quality -- the limiting stage
So you splice the instrumental into the song, and record your own vocals onto it. You mix your vocals to sound like a perfect match with the existing vocals (from the original song). Last step after the "mix" is mastering. However, the song has already been mastered -- so you don't want to change anything. What you do want to do is put a limiter on master bus so that the there's no limiting occurring during the original song, but when it hits your new parts, it limits them to bring the overall volume level at the same overall RMS as the original song. Do you recommend I limit the vocal bus (without the inst) first, and then have another limiter on the master bus to just do the tiniest bit of trimming (in order to maintain the same volume of the original)? Any tips? I don't want the limiter to be affecting the song except where I've added vocals. Everything else shouldn't hit the threshold, and therefore be unchanged from the original master. Thoughts? I've bought the Sony Oxford Limiter, so that'll be my weapon. I've done this before with good results, but I figured it wouldn't hurt to open the discussion in case there's some logic I've missed.
__________________ http://www.facebook.com/colakells |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear |
I put the limiter on the vocal bus to touch it a tad bit. Use the enhance slider on the vox bus. On the master bus put the limiter and set the output to .0008 to prevent overs. Input at 0. Leave the other sliders at default. On the master you're just preventing overs coming from the mix of the instrumental and vox bus. You're really just mixing the vocals so mix them as normal and send em to their own bus to be limited and use the master bus to prevent overs. Goodluck |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,613
| |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2007 Location: Canada
Posts: 1,351
Thread Starter | Quote:
I was thinking more a long the lines of -- is there things I should consider doing differently in the attack/release section, since i'm essentially just squashing the vocals flat onto the already slammed instrumental. | |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2007 Location: Canada
Posts: 1,351
Thread Starter | Quote: As explained in my response to jikky, my logic is to bring the limiter so it's just about to hit the song, but no reduction.. then when my new vocals come, it will squash those parts to the same peak as the original song.. thus giving me the full amplitude of the original release (and no more!). I don't have a problem with mud or things sounding squashed. I just thought I'd post to see what the other opinions are on this, as I'm not a pro. Btw, Sonnox really is working nicer than my previous limiter for this sort of thing!! | |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
I see where your going. The enhance slider has features of the sonnox inflator which increases the percieved volume. My process is to add my URS CSP on the inserts to comp there. Send it to the vocal group and use the enhance on the sonnox limiter or actually use the sonnox inflator to bring up the volume, but yea I guess I got that all wrong. Limit the vocal bus and not the master so u dont squash the track with the vocals since the instrumental track is already squashed. | |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2007 Location: Canada
Posts: 1,351
Thread Starter | Quote:
Btw, I know the manual says that, but the Enhance section in the Limiter is NOT at all the same as the Inflator. There has been a lot of discussion about these plugs on GS, and the original author is really annoyed about this error in the manual because he's had to clarify so many times. They are NOT the same. Just thought I'd let you know, cause I was happy to learn the truth about that (even tho the details are hard for someone like me to decipher) | |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2007 Location: Canada
Posts: 1,351
Thread Starter | which is the lesser of my 2 evils - room and gear, or mixing technique?
Of course, it's all speculation, but: Listening to this remix, what do you suspect makes the greatest impact on the difference in our vocal mix (including aspects like room and mic proximity)? Or do you think it's the mix of the vocals (including the fact mine are added to the already limited instrumental, rather than mixed as "part of the song"). Paula DeAnda - Easy (Feat. Lil' Wayne & St. Kelly) - zshare.net Wayne was no doubt recorded in a good room, through some typical pop chain like 800g -> CL1B -> 1073. Mine was $200 mic -> Pacifica (with no hardware comp). So there's some short comings there, and the room is much less than desirable :/ Is that the bigger of my problems, or is it the mixing stage that requires the more immediate improvement? Thanks for the critique/suggestions... |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,441
|
Why bother? It's jus mixtape stuff... you'll never be able to make your vocals sound like the original artist for a lot of obvious reasons. Btw Jikky technique aint that bad: the limiter on the 2buss can kinda glue your vocals with the original track.
|
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2007 Location: Canada
Posts: 1,351
Thread Starter | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Lives for gear |
Here's a screenshot of what you could possibly make it look like. I have inflator on the vocal bus and the limiter on the master bus. And the input on the limiter is at 0. So basically on the 2bus I'm only catching the peaks. No real limiting but I did use the enhance function and that did something I liked. |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| It's Official "ALL MCI Studio" Is Complete | Demonslave | High end | 15 | 8th December 2008 07:06 PM |
| Favorite "High End" quality but "Low End" price piece of gear? | Sacalait | High end | 123 | 26th November 2008 02:02 AM |
| How "official" does a contract need to be when purchasing beats? | Neruk | Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production | 13 | 12th May 2007 05:28 PM |
| A "Pro/Quality" Mix along the lines of Sterling "after hours"... | Liam Judah | High end | 4 | 20th September 2005 12:12 AM |
| The Official AES "Check This Out" Thread | David R. | So much gear, so little time! | 27 | 2nd November 2004 07:41 PM |
| |