![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| lo-pass and hi-pass filter | vanhaabe | Music computers | 2 | 10th February 2008 08:21 AM |
| Hi Pass Filter for API 3124 ? | jamieboss1 | So much gear, so little time! | 0 | 16th February 2007 02:18 PM |
| Hi-Pass Filter of the PM-1000 | yaniv | Geekslutz forum | 2 | 20th January 2007 05:09 PM |
| Which filter plug has band pass and hi pass all way to 20K? | kindkind | So much gear, so little time! | 2 | 24th March 2006 05:37 AM |
| High Pass Filter ? | kosi | So much gear, so little time! | 6 | 10th February 2003 05:59 PM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 316
| Hi Pass filter on a master? Well I heard this from one techno guy. He was talking about mastering, and he said that he is using a 12db/oct hi pass filter on 32 to 35 Hz on the whole mix, since you pretty much can't find a system that really gets that low. Since I do have a little studio, and most of the guys I record don't have money/time to get their stuff mastered, but want to hear it pretty loud, I throw a 3-4 db of compression and about 1 to 3 db's of limitting on top of that. Now I tried putting a digirack hpf before the limitter, and I was able to drive the track hotter, without hearing any differences! So I just wanted to know if any of you guys think about this little tweak? |
| |
| | #2 | |
| Gear maniac | Quote:
What I would do, however, is to filter the ones off every offending track and then they would never make it the master bus. | |
| |
| | #3 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 236
| I always hi-pass a lot when mixing so I don't have so much need for it on the 2bus, but I often do a 6 or 12 dB/oct at 30 or 25 hz as well. |
| |
| | #4 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 15
| I usually always throw a hi-pass of around 6-12db @ 35hz to remove any bog rumble, but I would like to know if anyone uses a Lo Pass filter on the other end of the spectrum to smooth out the tops? say at 15-17khz? |
| |
| | #5 | ||
| Gear addict Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Richmond, Ca
Posts: 348
| Quote:
. I guess I should at least try to see ![]()
__________________ Quote:
| ||
| |
| | #6 |
| Gear maniac | Nebula has a program specifically for that. It tightens the shit out of your mixes. I was ShOCKED. Although, this wouldn't be good for Rap, as you'd be losing something the clubs would like. Or not? |
| |
| | #7 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 77
| Air and sparkle are up in 15-17Khz realm so you would want to try this out at a higher Khz |
| |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear | If you're recording at 44.1, the A/D is already doing that for you around 22k or so (depends on the converter).
__________________ In the can/on the horizon: Aerosmith, Jules Shear, The Dresden Dolls, James Montgomery, Steve Smith, Solace, Jim Jones, Mike Stern, Smif n Wessun, DJ Kurrupt, Dave Weckyl, Dixie Witch, Dipset, The Skatalites, Roadsaw, Tony Furtado, Ironweed, Never Got Caught (Clutch and Tree), Elisabeth Whithers, etc, etc, et ceteraaaa... |
| |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,775
| Not necessarily. I mix a lot of dance and most of the boom in the clubs comes from subs and is generated from the higher bass frequencies. You don't need anywhere near as much below 30Hz as some would think, and you end up with a cleaner sub.
__________________ "My voice has a built in extortion box" - recent vocalist I recorded... |
| |
| | #10 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 316
| I wonder if 24db/oct filter would do better... I don't have a good enuff system at my studio to hear all that bass... My sub barely gets to 40Hz, and the club where I used to check out my mixes on some nice 20 inch bass bins is closed now... |
| |
| | #11 |
| Gear maniac | |
| |
| | #12 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 61
| Thats what I always say, cut the damn bass. It will bring the mids out, and you can even cut the highs cuz they dont have to fight for attention anymore. makes your drums sound tighter, and on the whole less muddy. |
| |
| | #13 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: san jose, califas
Posts: 1,911
| what's nebula? |
| |
| | #14 |
| Gear maniac | |
| |
| | #15 |
| Gear maniac | Part of this bundle. But there's a free one he let go. CD Sound Master Mastering Engineer Michael Angel Angel Lofte Studio Part of the Mastering Lib. Free Presets are at the site you gave the link to. It's called 40Hz Hi Pass or something to that effect. |
| |
| | #16 |
| Gear nut | I sometimes use a HP filter at about 40 to 60 hz on my master then I use Waves Maxi Bass or R-bass to bring that bass back. It kind of cleans up those frequency's with out losing them. This trick doesn't work on every track but it has it place You don't want your bass eating up all your headroom |
| |
| | #17 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 193
| I'm filtering most of the tracks while mixing, so at the end I don't need to use HPF. Using 1 HPF on a full mix might not work as good (couse of the covering ferq of all tracks at this area) as a carfull cutting in the mix. |
| |
| | #18 |
| Moderator Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Boston,MA Providence,RI
Posts: 9,662
| Talk about putting a band aid on a mix.... If you mix the low end right, you don't need to strap a high pass on the 2 buss. I say NO! ![]() |
| |
| | #19 | |
| Gear maniac | Quote:
I say if it works and you like it, do it. I don't think anyone hurt themselves in the process, not sure the ref to a band-aid / bandage. Oh well, we'll always have "do it right the first time, and if you didn't then you must not be a pro / know what you're doing." It all has it's place I presume. btw just ruffling feathers. | |
| |
| | #20 | |
| Moderator Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Boston,MA Providence,RI
Posts: 9,662
| Quote:
| |
| |
| | #21 | ||
| Gear maniac | Quote:
Quote:
![]() | ||
| |
| | #22 | |
| Mastering Moderator Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Always on the Run
Posts: 1,430
| Quote:
On a full mix you will inevitably affect the upper end of the spectrum (i.e the lower mids) If you don't have a very revealing monitoring system you might not notice it. Very easy to steal all the body from say a vocal performance. If you only have access to the mix then go for the lesser evil. See (hear) how high or steep you can go with the least damage.
__________________ Velvet Room Mastering "What quality level does it need to be? Personally, I work on mixes that range from marvellous to hideously diabolical.......I'd suggest you aim more towards the "marvellous" end of the scale!" - Darius van Helfteren - | |
| |
| | #23 | |
| Mastering Moderator Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Always on the Run
Posts: 1,430
| Quote:
It is used sometimes in mastering when excessive or shrill top end is present, usually a by-product of a less than perfect monitoring environment.
__________________ Velvet Room Mastering "What quality level does it need to be? Personally, I work on mixes that range from marvellous to hideously diabolical.......I'd suggest you aim more towards the "marvellous" end of the scale!" - Darius van Helfteren - | |
| |
| | #24 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,620
| Use as many high pass filters as there are tracks in the mix. Removing any part of a sound that you feel is not neccessary will help you have a louder and cleaner mix later. Spectral mixing people! lol |
| |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |