Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production


New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 13th February 2008   #31
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 237

Quote:
Originally Posted by phillysoulman View Post
With George Clinton in my studio using the RF
the mic is outside the filter!

does it even work that way?
musaee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2008   #32
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,846

Quote:
Originally Posted by lpuma View Post
Ok, ^^^whatever...

Again thank you everyone, I must admit you all have broken my DIY dream... LOL but you give me great advice, done some testings on my own voice (dont wanna take my rapper's head wit that shyt) and I'm really impressed by the RF.

I put 2 of my reflexion adders on my back and the mic capsule "in line" wit the end of the RF, If you want to hear here's the file + another one, jus my room, no treatment.

If you can give you thought about the "usability" of that kind of voice takes (the "dry one") for a radio ready release, it would be really apreciated. (the mix will be done by a pro at pro studio, mastering too)
Please take my words as encouragement because I AM really impressed with what you are trying to do here. So I don't mean this as an insult by ANY means. But, when I listened to the first one, I thought it was the one with no treatment and I thought, "okay, that's a lot of room." Then I listened to the second and went "what is going on?? this one is supposed to be drier!"

Bottom line, I don't think you will be able to get away with your 'dry' sound (unless you want it that way for creative reasons).

Not to bring up the comforter/duvet trick yet again, but when I moved my studio about six months ago I set up the room without the treatment first (delay in shipping all my 703... sucked). The room had NO treatment at all except carpet on the floor. Just to see what would happen in such a worst case scenario I threw up a mic and tested with nothing. And it sound like your no-treatment sample, not suprisingly. Then I threw up the blanket behind me and tested again. It was BETTER than your treated sample. Of course, now my room is treated for mxing (so not dead) and when I use the blanket I can make it dry as a bone if I want.

I don't know why so many people have such an aversion to the blanket trick when it works so well and is so darn cheap. If I was always recording in different places, then sure an RF would be nice. But for anyone who records at the same place all the time, it should be a no-brainer. Some people say it doesn't look as cool, but a friend of mine got raelly nice comforter/duvets with fancy patterns on them and it looks twice as pimped out as an RF. And no sight line problems either.

so lpuma, if your goal is really to knock the room ambience down, I really think you should look into that option.

I'm sorry this post sounds negative; I'm really just trying to be helpful as I went through the same process you are going through (and most have gone through) trying to get drier vocals down.
__________________
Chris 'Von Pimpenstein' Carter
Mixer | Producer
Studio: www.feistychicken.com | Me: www.vonpimpenstein.com
Two #1 hit singles; several top 40s; over 100 tv/film/ad placements
Mix Rates:
Major Label: $900
Indie / Unsigned: $550 per song
Budget / mixtape / beat mixes: $49 - $99
chris carter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2008   #33
DAH
Lives for gear
 
DAH's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Yaroslavl, Russia
Posts: 1,080

Send a message via ICQ to DAH Send a message via Skype™ to DAH
lpuma, I guess th low end boom reflections in both of your samples can not be polished in any way, so... that`s the same problem I experience at my untreated room - you can damp the highs and the mids, but the low end mud ****s up the signal still...
DAH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2008   #34
Lives for gear
 
Nahuel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,388

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris carter View Post
Please take my words as encouragement because I AM really impressed with what you are trying to do here. So I don't mean this as an insult by ANY means. But, when I listened to the first one, I thought it was the one with no treatment and I thought, "okay, that's a lot of room." Then I listened to the second and went "what is going on?? this one is supposed to be drier!"

Bottom line, I don't think you will be able to get away with your 'dry' sound (unless you want it that way for creative reasons).

Not to bring up the comforter/duvet trick yet again, but when I moved my studio about six months ago I set up the room without the treatment first (delay in shipping all my 703... sucked). The room had NO treatment at all except carpet on the floor. Just to see what would happen in such a worst case scenario I threw up a mic and tested with nothing. And it sound like your no-treatment sample, not suprisingly. Then I threw up the blanket behind me and tested again. It was BETTER than your treated sample. Of course, now my room is treated for mxing (so not dead) and when I use the blanket I can make it dry as a bone if I want.

I don't know why so many people have such an aversion to the blanket trick when it works so well and is so darn cheap. If I was always recording in different places, then sure an RF would be nice. But for anyone who records at the same place all the time, it should be a no-brainer. Some people say it doesn't look as cool, but a friend of mine got raelly nice comforter/duvets with fancy patterns on them and it looks twice as pimped out as an RF. And no sight line problems either.

so lpuma, if your goal is really to knock the room ambience down, I really think you should look into that option.

I'm sorry this post sounds negative; I'm really just trying to be helpful as I went through the same process you are going through (and most have gone through) trying to get drier vocals down.
No man; I apreciate honesty forreal, I jus need help, dont need d***riding comments.

I personally liked the "treated" one better but your right, I heard that a lot of the reflexions still there.

I'm gone try that blanket tin, we really cant afford voice recording studio time, thank you.

Thanks dah, you probably right, jus tryin to get the best result wit something I actually can afford.
__________________
Youtube - SoundCloud
Nahuel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th February 2008   #35
Gear maniac
 
Biggsheff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 171

Send a message via AIM to Biggsheff
I thought the problem was the low end of the vocals. Like taming the flutter by using 4inch thick 703 or something to that effect. I bought a ton of auralex then was told it was garbage, cause its not gonna help. It tames high freq, but not the lows where the problem occurs. I've also been told any type of 2 inch foam or foam period is useless. Maybe I was told wrong. I don't know.
Biggsheff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th February 2008   #36
Lives for gear
 
Nahuel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,388

Thread Starter
Ok thanks Bigg

So I actually almost finished my "booth": opened the pannels, added hanging pieces of carpet (cause I seen a dude DIYin bass traps with hanging peices of carpet so i thought i would not hurt), hanged duvets aroud an throwed a blanket on top of that. All that combined to the SE RF.

Jus did a quick test:

1 voice take close to the mic

2 voice take non so close to the mic a lil forced on the low

3 voice take non so close to the mic a lil forced on the high

You thought would be highly apreciated.
Attached Files
File Type: mp3 1voice-close.mp3 (211.0 KB, 368 views)
File Type: mp3 2voice-low.mp3 (526.1 KB, 320 views)
File Type: mp3 3voice-high.mp3 (487.3 KB, 291 views)
Nahuel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th February 2008   #37
Lives for gear
 
Nahuel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,388

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by bp103 View Post
haha thats a clear sounding voice in my opinion

sounds like it would be good for a booth

B
yes, really? I think (hope) it's not too bad. Thanks for the input, keep it comming.
Nahuel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2008   #38
Gear maniac
 
Petrusha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 161

Watch Tony Balmond DVD. There is alot of stuff he talks about treating vocal room!
__________________
_______________________________________
WTB: Dolby 740 Spectral Processor
Petrusha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2008   #39
Lives for gear
 
illacov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 3,668

Send a message via AIM to illacov Send a message via Yahoo to illacov
Talking Oh for goodness sakes!

You already did all the hard stuff constructing that wooden surface.


Slap some OC703 panels on it and call it a week. You probably need around 8 if you double stack em. You're talking 48 dollars more in materials plus taxes.


4" thick of OC703 in that little space will make a very big difference on your vocals.

Just back the mic into one of the corners and the OC703 will eat so much of the ambience it wont be funny.

Add the comforters behind you from the ceiling for a much drier sound than that, but to be honest, just some moving blankets will do you just too!

You can never have enough OC703.

Works on drum recording in a pinch too!

Peace
Illumination
__________________
Langston Masingale
Sales and Customer Support @ JJ Audio Mics, USA

**JJ Audio Custom Mics and Mods!!**

JJ Audio Mics Email (Langston/Sales and Customer Support)

Artists recently recorded with JJ Audio Mics:

Ronnie Spector, Baby Bash, Paula DeAnda, Z-Ro, Slim Thug and the list continues to grow...

http://soundcloud.com/illacov/jj-cd-vo-demo
illacov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2008   #40
Lives for gear
 
Nahuel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,388

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by illacov View Post
You already did all the hard stuff constructing that wooden surface.


Slap some OC703 panels on it and call it a week. You probably need around 8 if you double stack em. You're talking 48 dollars more in materials plus taxes.


4" thick of OC703 in that little space will make a very big difference on your vocals.

Just back the mic into one of the corners and the OC703 will eat so much of the ambience it wont be funny.

Add the comforters behind you from the ceiling for a much drier sound than that, but to be honest, just some moving blankets will do you just too!

You can never have enough OC703.

Works on drum recording in a pinch too!

Peace
Illumination
Ok, so if I get what you sayin you think the last takes need a to be a lil dryer and it would be nice? and you suggest to add some comforters or a another blanket on the back of the singer for a dryer sound.. ? right? Ima try it.
Nahuel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2008   #41
Lives for gear
 
illacov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 3,668

Send a message via AIM to illacov Send a message via Yahoo to illacov
Talking The blankets would....

Get rid of any stray reflections from behind you, which is what the mic is aimed at in the first place.

Either way, having both directions covered is better.

You could put the comforter on mic stands or moving blankets on mic stands and it would do the trick for the most part.

I was saying to use the OC703 because it is DEFINATELY much more absorbent than foam.

You SHOULD look into possibly drilling some holes in those wooden panels because this actually eliminates the level of reflection from the wood itself that is behind the absorbing material.

After all AIR is the nbr one sonic absorber.

Depending on your tastes you may want dead or just controlled space. Its up to you.

Alot of that is truly about decisions and just how dead you need your vocals to sound.

In a full mix, it does help ALOT to have a dead quiet vocal when you have up in your face vocals, but there are times where it doesnt make sense because you're going to add reverb and delays to the vocals anyways.

Like I said it depends.

Having all the tools in place is the best bet for you though.

I have an 800 square foot attic that I record stuff in (drums, vocals, guitars etc..) It does need some more treating but there are quite a few tricks to eliminate reflections.

Peace
Illumination
illacov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2008   #42
Lives for gear
 
Nahuel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,388

Thread Starter
Ok thanks man, well as far as buying bass traps I have to wait cause I already spent all my cash this month (yeah I'm pretty broke, not that much but not rich).

But as far as opening the wood pannels I already did it.

Jus a question to make sure we are talking about the same thing: you noticed my last "test post"? (#36)

You think those samples still not dry enought? (could be fo sure, I dont know in fact, I feel like it sound ok but i'm sure about nottin and i'm no engineer)

Sorry if you feel like I'm a lil slow but I want to make sure we are talking about the same thing.
Nahuel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2008   #43
Lives for gear
 
Nahuel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,388

Thread Starter
Somebody wanted to hear the (final) DIYed booth Without the RF, here it is:

(I jus made another one wit my comp in the chain)
Attached Files
File Type: mp3 withoutRF.mp3 (216.1 KB, 307 views)
File Type: mp3 withoutRFcomp.mp3 (218.2 KB, 275 views)
Nahuel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st February 2008   #44
DAH
Lives for gear
 
DAH's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Yaroslavl, Russia
Posts: 1,080

Send a message via ICQ to DAH Send a message via Skype™ to DAH
yes, that was me.
yes, the RF seems to tame the lows a bit. which can be relevant at the stage.
DAH is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
sE Reflexion Filter vs. RealTraps Vocal Booth Sonicvalley So much gear, so little time! 19 1st December 2010 08:30 PM
Cheapest Vocal Booth Ever Vermeer So much gear, so little time! 25 8th August 2009 05:21 PM
DIY Vocal Booth Joji So much gear, so little time! 13 7th June 2006 09:05 AM
DIY isolation/vocal booth Robert Randolph Low End Theory 1 3rd March 2005 08:52 AM
Cheap DIY Vocal Booth DanV So much gear, so little time! 8 13th June 2003 08:33 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:29 AM.

 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com Limited - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office: 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.