Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dave Pensado in Jan SOS mag PhonoquO Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production 4 26th January 2007 12:17 AM
Hey Dave Pensado, M2E here, Welcome M2E So much gear, so little time! 9 11th August 2004 05:55 PM

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 1st August 2007, 10:45 PM   #1
idlabs
Gear maniac
 
idlabs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 177
Send a message via AIM to idlabs
Dave Pensado mix/Brian Gardener Master - Before and After

This is an artist named Wiz Khalifa from Pittsburgh, PA, that I've worked with for the past 4 years or so. He was recently signed to Warner Bros. and we went to LA to mix a few of his songs w/ DP at Larrabee Studios. Brian "Big Bass" Gardener mastered them. I thought that you guys would wanna check out the before and afters, I know it's always been helpful for me when people have done similar things on Gearslutz.

About the song:

The beat was produced by The Resource (NY), with co-production by myself (E. Dan). I tracked everything on my DIGI002 rig. Vocal chain was U87 > Avalon Vt737sp > Rosetta AD to DIGI. Done at 24-bit/44.1k.

About the files:

1. My rough mix (ITB, Waves, UAD)
2. Dave Pensado mix (SSL K series, lots of outboard)
3. Brian Gardener master (No idea, wasn't there)

Sorry they are just snippets (and mp3's), it was the only way I could post them without ruffling feathers. Also the hook is (obviously) different on the rough version. We made some changes to it while we were mixing w/ DP.

Anyway, feel free to post comments, thoughts, whatever. Happy to share it, hope it helps or is at least interesting to some of you.

E
idlabs is online now  
Old 1st August 2007, 10:49 PM   #2
sethdk
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 173
I like the rough mix better than the dave pensado mix. Bottom seems more hip hop to me. Would love to have heard that mix mastered.

man i remember us spending $20k to mix a single 4X in SSL rooms in NYC and LA (dont wanna throw the eingineers under the bus w/ names) and the version that made the final cut was the ITB "ruff mix" from our spot.
sethdk is offline  
Old 1st August 2007, 10:55 PM   #3
idlabs
Gear maniac
 
idlabs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 177
Send a message via AIM to idlabs
Quote:
Originally Posted by sethdk View Post
I like the rough mix better than the dave pensado mix. Bottom seems more hip hop to me. Would love to have heard that mix mastered.

man i remember us spending $20k to mix a single 4X in SSL rooms in NYC and LA and the version that made the final cut was the ITB "ruff mix" from the crib.
Thanks man. Nice to hear considering little old me mixed it on my little old LE system and Dave is Dave and mixed it on an SSL. Yeah, there is certain things about the rough I really like better. Certain things I love about DP's mix though as well, especially the Vox.
idlabs is online now  
Old 1st August 2007, 10:58 PM   #4
Wiggum, Ralph
Gear maniac
 
Wiggum, Ralph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: South Florida
Posts: 210
I just checked just the first :30sec of all tracks.

I like the rough version, it was nice. I wouldnt say what I heard from Dave's mix would be "better" just more polished. The Kick is pointer(less bass also) and the bass really sits in the mix. But both are fine.

As far as Brian Mastering, that was also great. I'll check all three in their entirety when Im done making some music for the day.
Wiggum, Ralph is offline  
Old 1st August 2007, 10:59 PM   #5
doorknocker
Lives for gear
 
doorknocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Basel, Switzerland
Posts: 3,618
I like the 'rough mix' the best by far. And it doesn't sound 'rough' at all.
__________________
Andi

www.doorknocker.ch

'You'd be surprised how much it costs to look this cheap! - Dolly Parton
doorknocker is offline  
Old 1st August 2007, 11:00 PM   #6
superburtm
Lives for gear
 
superburtm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,382
nice job on the rough mix
superburtm is offline  
Old 1st August 2007, 11:20 PM   #7
O'Ryan
Gear maniac
 
O'Ryan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 157
yup the ruffs sounds better......and the mastered joint sounds good as well
O'Ryan is offline  
Old 1st August 2007, 11:24 PM   #8
idlabs
Gear maniac
 
idlabs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 177
Send a message via AIM to idlabs
Wow. Thanks yall. My ego is inflating as I type this.
idlabs is online now  
Old 1st August 2007, 11:50 PM   #9
Oscar
Gear nut
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 79
Dave did his thing, especially with the bass track, but overall I prefer the rough mix too. No lie. I don't like how Dave pulled the organ that gets panned back and forth throughout the verses so far back in the mix. I really don't like the kick on Dave's mix. Also, I prefer the hook on the rough mix. If it was me I'd have Brian do a master on the rough mix and put it out that way (especially if Dave is getting any points). Either way, you're definitely doing it.
Oscar is offline  
Old 1st August 2007, 11:52 PM   #10
adrianex
Lives for gear
 
adrianex's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 710
Another vote on the rough mix...great job
adrianex is offline  
Old 1st August 2007, 11:59 PM   #11
sedohr
Lives for gear
 
sedohr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Reykjavik, Iceland
Posts: 841
Quote:
Originally Posted by adrianex View Post
Another vote on the rough mix...great job
yup, sounds nice!
sedohr is offline  
Old 2nd August 2007, 12:06 AM   #12
illynoise
Lives for gear
 
illynoise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,622
liked all of the mixes, but I can see why Pensado mixes that way, you basically get a better master with his mix than the first one. Theres more freq's to work with in Mastering phase. The first mix is more like what my clients would want to hear out the door, but not what they really would need.
__________________
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base Jase
Illynoise Music
www.basejase.com
illynoise is offline  
Old 2nd August 2007, 12:13 AM   #13
no ssl yet
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I like Dave's mix. It sounds more like what I think a record should. But I don't care for his kick. (Though I can see why he'd go in that direction after hearing the rough)

EDIT:

After listening more, I totally see where Dave is going He has better panning, more separation. He got rid of the siblance on the vocal and made the snare better. His bass is better as well. His placement of the shakers/hat make the beat groove more through the hook as well.


The only thing I really liked from the rough is having the organ parts during the verse louder, and there's this part in the hook that sounds like a string part. (cant totally tell what it is, but it happens in a triplet pattern following the bassline. It sounds like G, G#,A). It's so low in Dave's mix that it's almost missing. I like the role it plays in the rough.
 
Old 2nd August 2007, 12:17 AM   #14
no ssl yet
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by illynoise View Post
liked all of the mixes, but I can see why Pensado mixes that way, you basically get a better master with his mix than the first one. Theres more freq's to work with in Mastering phase. The first mix is more like what my clients would want to hear out the door, but not what they really would need.
exactly
 
Old 2nd August 2007, 12:21 AM   #15
Mr B.
Gear Head
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Paris
Posts: 50
One more for the rough mix but I think dave s mix is more clean if you see what i mean.

You got the vibe man.
Mr B. is offline  
Old 2nd August 2007, 12:26 AM   #16
idlabs
Gear maniac
 
idlabs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 177
Send a message via AIM to idlabs
Quote:
Originally Posted by illynoise View Post
liked all of the mixes, but I can see why Pensado mixes that way, you basically get a better master with his mix than the first one. Theres more freq's to work with in Mastering phase. The first mix is more like what my clients would want to hear out the door, but not what they really would need.
Yup, exactly how I felt.
idlabs is online now  
Old 2nd August 2007, 12:28 AM   #17
KingUgly
Gear maniac
 
KingUgly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 250
Don't worry man, the master sounds great.
KingUgly is offline  
Old 2nd August 2007, 12:43 AM   #18
chester
Gear addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: the whole world
Posts: 368
both are nice, but dave's version got the better glue and verbs even if the kick does not have the same subbass, imho. also vocals are less sibilant, what i like. same goes to the organ which is less harsh to my ears, fits better into the song same goes to the piano, it is more in the back in dave's version.

but at the end, both did good work!
chester is offline  
Old 2nd August 2007, 02:12 AM   #19
rickrock305
Lives for gear
 
rickrock305's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Miami FL
Posts: 6,828
i'll preface by saying that the rough sounds really good.


but dave's mix just sounds more like a record, like a mix in the truest sense of the word. i feel like his mix glues together the elements a little better.
rickrock305 is offline  
Old 2nd August 2007, 02:42 AM   #20
vaesion
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: tampa
Posts: 525
Send a message via AIM to vaesion
what treatment does dave do to his vocals to make them sound the way they do.........is it just eq or a desser......
the vox in the itb mix has brighter vocals like the masterd version. apparently dave mixes so the highs can be boosted over the whole song in mastering.
vaesion is offline  
Old 2nd August 2007, 02:43 AM   #21
vaesion
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: tampa
Posts: 525
Send a message via AIM to vaesion
this was very cool of you man......
your mix is great. i like both of them
vaesion is offline  
Old 2nd August 2007, 04:08 AM   #22
3rdeyeKnight
Gear addict
 
3rdeyeKnight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 380
Nice work man. Thanks for sharing.
__________________
-ignorance is not a trend-
3rdeyeKnight is offline  
Old 2nd August 2007, 04:50 AM   #23
filterayok
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,285
this goes back to the "loudness wars"

did everyone remember to bring the gain down on the rough mix before you A/B'd them? I garuntee many of you would change your tune if you braught pensado's mix to the same level as the rough-----daves is much clearer, and more compact.... try it....this is why everyones obsessed with loudness--cuz louder often means better
filterayok is offline  
Old 2nd August 2007, 05:19 AM   #24
dissolva
Gear Head
 
dissolva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 53
I preferred Dave's mix. Alot of subtle things that just took the song to the next level for me. I've been a fan of Wiz since I heard this track last year. I look forward to the final product!
dissolva is offline  
Old 2nd August 2007, 05:26 AM   #25
JGILL
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 206
One more for your rough

I think if Brain would of mastered your rough it would of been neck and neck. Both sound great. Two different ways of getting the same things. keep doin you.
JGILL is offline  
Old 2nd August 2007, 06:43 AM   #26
DaKid
Gear addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 355
No sh!t...

I remember readin bout Wiz on allhiphop.com a while ago.... in the breeding ground.... the young kid got some talent... plus he's from pa!

I'll check out the joints tomorrow... but best of luck... It'd be nice to have another area blow in pa besides philly....
DaKid is offline  
Old 2nd August 2007, 01:29 PM   #27
Lourson
Gear Head
 
Lourson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 34
a trick to check a mix has been to L2 it (let's say 3 or 4 db of attenuation) it and hear at what point things start to sounds really bad.

I'm able to push dave's mix pretty far in the L2, the rough mix not so much.

Even though dave's mix sounds less "imediatly pleasing" it's tighter all around, more "mastering ready" and a better starting point for a really good master.
Lourson is offline  
Old 2nd August 2007, 02:07 PM   #28
MarkusColeman
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: on the couch
Posts: 946
I like Dave's mix better. cleaner and tighter.
but the clap/verb/snare on the 4 is too loud and the choir sample drops are too.
you can hear how Gardner tried to tame it in the master.
I liked the panning organs in the original, but if you listen to the mix in mono, you will understand why he pushed them back.
also try to swap the stereo on the whole mix and see if you like it better that way.
the panning doesn't sound right on many of the instruments.
MarkusColeman is offline  
Old 2nd August 2007, 02:10 PM   #29
doorknocker
Lives for gear
 
doorknocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Basel, Switzerland
Posts: 3,618
Quote:
Originally Posted by illynoise View Post
liked all of the mixes, but I can see why Pensado mixes that way, you basically get a better master with his mix than the first one. Theres more freq's to work with in Mastering phase. The first mix is more like what my clients would want to hear out the door, but not what they really would need.
You make it sound like mixing is a scientific thing. I like the 'Rough' better because it sounds more musical and pleasing to my ears to me. If you like DP's mix better that's fine of course but to say 'I might not like it as much but it works better when slamming it with a L2' doesn't make sense. The ME will hopefully do more than just apply a L2 and so he'll be perfectly fine with the 'Rough' IMO.
__________________
Andi

www.doorknocker.ch

'You'd be surprised how much it costs to look this cheap! - Dolly Parton
doorknocker is offline  
Old 2nd August 2007, 03:20 PM   #30
idlabs
Gear maniac
 
idlabs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 177
Send a message via AIM to idlabs
Quote:
Originally Posted by vaesion View Post
what treatment does dave do to his vocals to make them sound the way they do.........is it just eq or a desser......
the vox in the itb mix has brighter vocals like the masterd version. apparently dave mixes so the highs can be boosted over the whole song in mastering.
As I remember it, DP used the Waves RDeEsser into the BF Fairchild plug, then an REQ and into the Digi DeEsser. I know on one of the songs (not sure if it was this one) he ran the vox thru a Summit TLA-100 into an old "Motown" EQ. Not sure what it was exactly, but he said it was pulled from the Motown studios. He also did some additional EQ/Comp on the SSL. He's def not afraid to process the sh#t out of anything. Probably doesn't speak too well to my recording, but in fairness, I recorded this song a looong time ago.

I should also point out that the rough version is most certainly that. I mixed the original version of the song a few years back. About a month before we went to mix w/ DP, I revamped the original producers drums and added some keyboard parts and we did a new hook. I didn't really remix those new elements because by that point I knew DP was going to mix it, so I just did a quick ref mix for him to get the idea. I like what he did to it though, he is a great engineer, and wonderful guy. Also, his partner/assistant Jaycen Joshua, did alot of the mixing as well, particularly the drums and bass. DP would kinda let him do his thing, then step in and expand on what he had. They seem to have a nice tag-team sorta workflow.
idlabs is online now  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®