Is this idea a waste of my time? (Drum Question) - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production


Is this idea a waste of my time? (Drum Question)

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11th July 2007   #1
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 6

Thread Starter
Is this idea a waste of my time? (Drum Question)

First, let me say hello to you all since this is my very first post.

What I'd like to know is if I took a mono kick sample and ran it twice in two separate channels and panned each kick channel hard left and hard right and treated them with the same eq and dynamics and then resampled the false stero kick as a stereo sample would it give my kick that big sound I'm looking for in my drums?

Or would it be better for me to sidechain the kick through my compressor?
Invisible Heroes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th July 2007   #2
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 522

Send a message via AIM to matthew.sawicki
Quote:
Originally Posted by Invisible Heroes View Post
First, let me say hello to you all since this is my very first post.

What I'd like to know is if I took a mono kick sample and ran it twice in two separate channels and panned each kick channel hard left and hard right and treated them with the same eq and dynamics and then resampled the false stero kick as a stereo sample would it give my kick that big sound I'm looking for in my drums?

Or would it be better for me to sidechain the kick through my compressor?
Well... the first situation will only result in your kick being louder, not in stereo.

As for number two... I don't think you really made sense. Sidechain the kick through what compressor, compressing what?
__________________
Matthew Sawicki
www.suburbanprostudios.com

follow me on twitter! twitter.com/matthewsawicki

matthew.sawicki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th July 2007   #3
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 6

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by matthew.sawicki View Post
Well... the first situation will only result in your kick being louder, not in stereo.

As for number two... I don't think you really made sense. Sidechain the kick through what compressor, compressing what?
What I'm hoping for a bigger drum sound meaning a louder and wider kick.
Invisible Heroes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th July 2007   #4
Lives for gear
 
piccazzo's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: Stockholm / Sweden
Posts: 653

Quote:
What I'm hoping for a bigger drum sound meaning a louder and wider kick.
That`s called mixing.A craft that takes time to learn.
piccazzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th July 2007   #5
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 6

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by piccazzo View Post
That`s called mixing.A craft that takes time to learn.
Gee, thanks guy.
Invisible Heroes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th July 2007   #6
Gear Head
 
TomiGran's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: Shreveport, La.
Posts: 33

Hey,

I think you would just run in to a little bit of a phasing issue. I would leave the original kick where it is and try doing a little bit of parallel compression with a widener of some sort in the chain. You'd probably want to use a fast attack on the compression as not to have as much of a noticeable phasing issue on the transient with the original. In fact, if it were me, I'd leave the widener out of the picture all together. That's one way to get a fatter kick, but if a wide kick is what you're going for......I don't know....I've never really had to widen a kick channel. But there are many ways to do it. Tracking through good converters for one, seems to make everything sound wider.
__________________

TomiGran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th July 2007   #7
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 665

Try stereo verb (with a high pass filter) or place a stereo chorus on a send, send a bit to it, and highpass that.
khameln is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th July 2007   #8
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Location: Highlands of Scotland
Posts: 2,019

Try adding some big, low, long-travelling reverb to the kick.
The Byre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th July 2007   #9
Lives for gear
 
Big 3rd's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Detroit, WHAT!!!
Posts: 3,881

The only way you get a "fake" stereo sound is to have the copied version be different in some way from the original, whether it's through eqing or adding delay. That's at least the basics of a stereo sound.
__________________
http://www.myspace.com/3rdpwrprod
Get at me!

-Perception ceases to be reality when the undeniable evidence used, to support the claim, becames a rarity-
Big 3rd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th July 2007   #10
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 665

Yeah. with a kick, you really want to leave the foundation of it (the lower part) in mono though, because that's what's anchoring your song. So anything you do stereo-wise is usually better done by filtering off the low end and then applying some kind of stereo effect.

Copying the whole kick L/R and processing it differently just gives me the heebiejeebies.
khameln is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th July 2007   #11
Gear Guru
 
psycho_monkey's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Location: London
Posts: 14,293

Send a message via Skype™ to psycho_monkey
Quote:
Originally Posted by Invisible Heroes View Post
Gee, thanks guy.
A slightly sarcastic response maybe, but you are kind of asking "how do I mix?" which can't really be answered in a post.

Answers are: compression/EQ/effects/other processing/kitchen sink. What would be MORE helpful is if you posted an example of what you're wanting to achieve, and what you've currently got.

As someone pointed out above, duplicating channels and panning hard left/right is exactly the same as sending one channel dead centre (ie to left AND right), although it'll sound a bit louder (+6dB maybe?). you need to process them differently to get any sense of width...which probably isn't the right approach for a kick drum.
psycho_monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th July 2007   #12
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 634

^^maybe you and picazzo can make a tutorial thread on how to ask perfectly worded questions on gearslutz forums.
A-List is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th July 2007   #13
Lives for gear
 
Methlab's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Orlando
Posts: 3,686

Like a lot of guys are saying..stereo Reverb is what you are hearing, and that is why someone else mentioned getting good at mixing. Tricks like that come easy after you work at mixing for a long time.
__________________
Professionally played Basslines for $35 a Track. www.professionalbassguitar.com
Methlab is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11th July 2007   #14
Gear Guru
 
psycho_monkey's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Location: London
Posts: 14,293

Send a message via Skype™ to psycho_monkey
Quote:
Originally Posted by A-List View Post
^^maybe you and picazzo can make a tutorial thread on how to ask perfectly worded questions on gearslutz forums.
No one said "perfect"...but vague questions are always answered by more questions.

What are "big" drums exactly? Dre? Bonham? Def Leppard??????

Come on, without knowing exactly what sort of sound someone's going for, advice is difficult to give. And given the other comments in the post, any advice someone DOES give is likely to be misunderstood. Saying "put some reverb on the kick", as accurate as it may be, could be misunderstood in so many ways. In my work with music technology A-Level students, I've heard a million different ways to mess up reverb...

The best advice here should be to go do some reading, some experimenting, and come back with more questions once you've got a handle on some of the basics.
psycho_monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th July 2007   #15
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 634

^^ agreed
A-List is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th July 2007   #16
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 6

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by psycho_monkey View Post
No one said "perfect"...but vague questions are always answered by more questions.

What are "big" drums exactly? Dre? Bonham? Def Leppard??????

Come on, without knowing exactly what sort of sound someone's going for, advice is difficult to give. And given the other comments in the post, any advice someone DOES give is likely to be misunderstood. Saying "put some reverb on the kick", as accurate as it may be, could be misunderstood in so many ways. In my work with music technology A-Level students, I've heard a million different ways to mess up reverb...

The best advice here should be to go do some reading, some experimenting, and come back with more questions once you've got a handle on some of the basics.
When I say I want that big and wide drum sound I'm talking about the smack you in the face Just Blaze and Dr. Dre drum sound.
Invisible Heroes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th July 2007   #17
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 634

just blaze 2000 or 2006?
Dr Dre 1990 or 2003?
we need exact details.

just kidding
A-List is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th July 2007   #18
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 6

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by A-List View Post
just blaze 2000 or 2006?
Dr Dre 1990 or 2003?
we need exact details.

just kidding
Fabolous - Return of the Hustle produced by Just Blaze
Jay-Z - Lost Ones produced by Dr. Dre
Invisible Heroes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th July 2007   #19
Lives for gear
 
piccazzo's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: Stockholm / Sweden
Posts: 653

Quote:
When I say I want that big and wide drum sound I'm talking about the smack you in the face Just Blaze and Dr. Dre drum sound.
My answer still stands , Mixing & Mastering.
I heard Dre does a lot of mixing himself but has good people who he leaves the mastering to.And if you listen to a lotta of dre tracks that HUGE sound is more in his arrangement that in the sounds themselfs.Very Sparce productions with just a few key elements , drums of course beeing one of them.

Good samples , Good arrangements and exxelent mastering will get you a long way.

Fabolous - Return of the Hustle produced by Just Blaze is no that impressive in my mind but a good track thoug.
There`s a few videos of Just Blaze making that track on youtube or myspace so check em out and you get a little more insight in how he did that track.

To sum up what u might need or need to to,
Big speakers or a sub , so you hear what happens in the low freq
Study intrumentals and listen to the productions
Study tutorials on mixing and mastering
Get the best samples you can find and layer them
Master techniques like paralell & bus compression
Eq is a tool that make good sounds better , and bad sounds ok

And frankly 99,99 % of the population on earth can`t hear the difference between the drum sounds on a Dre track or a Just Blaze track so focus more on making good songs than getting hung up on trying to get that perfect drum sound.

Just my 2 cents...
piccazzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th July 2007   #20
New School Boom Bap
 
KevWest's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,946

Send a message via AIM to KevWest Send a message via MSN to KevWest
Quote:
Originally Posted by Methlab View Post
Like a lot of guys are saying..stereo Reverb is what you are hearing, and that is why someone else mentioned getting good at mixing. Tricks like that come easy after you work at mixing for a long time.
u have the best avys
KevWest is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 13th July 2007   #21
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 6

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by piccazzo View Post
My answer still stands , Mixing & Mastering.
I heard Dre does a lot of mixing himself but has good people who he leaves the mastering to.And if you listen to a lotta of dre tracks that HUGE sound is more in his arrangement that in the sounds themselfs.Very Sparce productions with just a few key elements , drums of course beeing one of them.

Good samples , Good arrangements and exxelent mastering will get you a long way.

Fabolous - Return of the Hustle produced by Just Blaze is no that impressive in my mind but a good track thoug.
There`s a few videos of Just Blaze making that track on youtube or myspace so check em out and you get a little more insight in how he did that track.

To sum up what u might need or need to to,
Big speakers or a sub , so you hear what happens in the low freq
Study intrumentals and listen to the productions
Study tutorials on mixing and mastering
Get the best samples you can find and layer them
Master techniques like paralell & bus compression
Eq is a tool that make good sounds better , and bad sounds ok

And frankly 99,99 % of the population on earth can`t hear the difference between the drum sounds on a Dre track or a Just Blaze track so focus more on making good songs than getting hung up on trying to get that perfect drum sound.

Just my 2 cents...
Thanks. I found a tutorial that helped me figure out the sound I wanted to get and it worked great.
Invisible Heroes is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Old Tascam M-35 8-channel Mixer..waste of time? Blues Low End Theory 32 10th April 2012 06:30 AM
If TAXI is a waste of time.....How do I get my music heard adclark Music Business 121 13th March 2012 08:50 AM
beta 52, waste of time? frugalpole Low End Theory 36 15th October 2006 06:57 PM
It's all a waste of time... kats So much gear, so little time! 7 26th August 2005 09:24 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:16 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.