Sequencing Trax in the MPC!!!?? - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production


Sequencing Trax in the MPC!!!??

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 8th June 2007   #1
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 227

Thread Starter
Sequencing Trax in the MPC!!!??

I usually just make loops in the mpc and then track em out as loops to save time when tracking... i feell like if i make the whole track in the mpc as one sequence i can make it sound more like an actual "song" but i can only record one track at a time, because im using spdif to record... so it would take me forever to track out my beats into my daw... what do u guys feel about this subject? Im into making underground style beats btw... check out some of my shit at www.myspace.com/djmarz45
dmarz45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2007   #2
Lives for gear
 
cynic one's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: san jose, califas
Posts: 2,610

just depends on if you wanna wait for the entire song to track out. i don't think there's much to discuss here :p
cynic one is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2007   #3
Gear Guru
 
psycho_monkey's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Location: London
Posts: 14,293

Send a message via Skype™ to psycho_monkey
it takes forever....what to track out say 16 tracks....even assuming all are stereo (and if not, you can do 2 at once)....of a 5min song, that's only an hour and a half. If you think that it makes an improvement for the better, surely your music is worth investing the extra time?!

And of course, the time you save just tracking out "loops", you'll lose when you then have to recreate the arrangement within your DAW...
psycho_monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2007   #4
Gear Head
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Location: London
Posts: 35

I have a great fondness for the MPC's song mode but as soon as I got PT I never used it again. You know that even if you do track the entire song into your DAW you'll end up doing some stuff to it and editing it. There is a feeling of satisfaction when you press that red button and a whole song plays from the MPC but life's too short.

Interesting that you're using the Spdif. I always thought a lot of the vodooo of the MPC 3000 at least came from the stereo outs. I always steered clear of the indivdual outs for that reason and never really bothered with the digital out at all.
fast-ideas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2007   #5
Lives for gear
 
Justice's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 695

the 3000 has a digital out?

I dont think so.......
Justice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2007   #6
Lives for gear
 
dlmorley's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,932

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmarz45 View Post
I usually just make loops in the mpc and then track em out as loops to save time when tracking... i feell like if i make the whole track in the mpc as one sequence i can make it sound more like an actual "song" but i can only record one track at a time, because im using spdif to record... so it would take me forever to track out my beats into my daw... what do u guys feel about this subject? Im into making underground style beats btw... check out some of my shit at www.myspace.com/djmarz45
Track them out.

Simple as that.

OR upgrade your MPC to one with individual outs and then you only have to do 2 or 3 runs max

You don't have many other options. Also saying it takes forever kind of will alienate many people here I think. People spend 4 or 5 hours setting up drums to get a take or DAYS mixing tracks. While you are transferring stuff, get another synth out and make some sounds or whatever, but almost to say it's too much bother kind of comes across as a bit negative
No disrespect, just a mention!

I also love working this way in the MPC. Creating whole songs. It's a very nice way to work. MPC60 here
dlmorley is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2007   #7
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 227

Thread Starter
im usin the mpc2500... the converters suck on my m-audio audiophile usb so i dont even bother recording via the stereo inputs.. thats why i just use spdif... and also i can get my mixes alot louder when recording with spdif
dmarz45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th June 2007   #8
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: Dade/Broward County FLORIDA
Posts: 21

Send a message via AIM to Johnny Biggs Send a message via Yahoo to Johnny Biggs
i still build the entire song in my mpc wit song mode

i dont like the recordin of loops and then piecin em together in pro tools, i'd rather just setup my entire song mode in mpc, dump the 4 mins , then mute shit out and cut and shit in pt
Johnny Biggs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th June 2007   #9
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,017

I actually track the loops, i have 8 outs on both drum machines and they run through my patchbay into the pres, i feel like i always add things later and as long as i have the "skeleton" down, im good.
deuc647 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th June 2007   #10
Gear addict
 
digiman's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 435

Quote:
Originally Posted by deuc647 View Post
I actually track the loops, i have 8 outs on both drum machines and they run through my patchbay into the pres, i feel like i always add things later and as long as i have the "skeleton" down, im good.
Please explain what you mean by "tracking loops". Do you mean just dumping a basic 4 (or 8) bar skeletal sequence on from the MPC into the DAW? Then from then from there you construct the song in in the DAW by appending sequences together and adding things on top of that? If that's the case, does the DAW then become the sequencer for adding things in?
digiman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th June 2007   #11
Lives for gear
 
ignatius's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Location: Sasquatch, OR
Posts: 4,269

i don't use an mpc but w/other drummachines and synths w/internal sequencers sometimes i make the whole song in the machine then use the indivudal outs or do multiple passes. it always has a different feel when i do it this way. if i can realize my idea for the song in the machine itself then that's the way i choose to do it.

sometimes though i can't get the transitions etc that i want for the song. in those cases i get as close as i can and track it out almost like the way i imagine it then edit.. either way i try to use the song mode in a given machine. it gets me away from the computer a bit and i like that.
ignatius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th June 2007   #12
Gear Head
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Location: London
Posts: 35

Quote:
Originally Posted by Justice View Post
the 3000 has a digital out?

I dont think so.......
LOL.... Just goes to demonstrate the extent of my interest in the MPC's digital capabilities.
fast-ideas is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Breathing on upright bass trax mojo1 So much gear, so little time! 8 1st March 2007 03:13 PM
MPC 2500 vs. Z4 + PT7 sequencing rlsoundsystem Electronic Music Instruments & Electronic Music Production 1 16th January 2007 10:40 AM
Mix and recording feedback on some trax guitar7171 Work In Progress / Advice Requested / Show & Tell / Artist Showcase / Mix-Offs 0 11th January 2007 03:45 AM
dj's copping myspace trax! soultrane The Moan Zone 2 9th January 2006 02:00 AM
MPC vs Software for sequencing derker Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production 64 3rd January 2006 07:23 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:15 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.