![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
| Notices |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| most over rated piece of gear | whitepapagold | So much gear, so little time! | 152 | 20th December 2006 10:36 PM |
| SIR Reverb - rated highly! | Maddstone | Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production | 11 | 8th May 2006 09:33 AM |
| neve gear is over-rated!!! | soultrane | High end | 25 | 29th July 2005 12:11 PM |
| Difference between Rated Impedance & Rated Load Impedance? | pardahl | So much gear, so little time! | 1 | 25th June 2005 07:18 PM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 193
| mixing is over-rated I got the title for this thread from something you said in an earlier post.... How much are you committing to tape during tracking? ie: Do you print your parallel drum processing such as the sansamp and ss 610 tracks? and do you print it seperately or go ahead and combine it with the original sounds? Are you doing most of your tweaking (eq and comp) on individual instruments in the tracking stage? |
| | |
| | #2 | |
| mongrell mixer Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 382
| Quote:
Did I say that?? Hmmmm. I think what I meant is that when a song is tastefully recorded there's a wide margin in mixing that will work and not destroy the song. I always print my FX except on the vocal. Depends on the project whether the tracks are combined. Now with PT's FX are print separately most of the time. I'm always tweaking individual tracks, just like everybody else.
__________________ tb | |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |