dealing with +100 tracks and revisions - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > Expert Question & Answer Archives (read only archive, not open for new posts) > Q & A session with Tony Maserati

dealing with +100 tracks and revisions
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28th February 2009   #1
Gear maniac
 
Russell Elevado's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Location: i'm a gypsy
Posts: 230

Thread Starter
dealing with +100 tracks and revisions

hello tony,

major props for maintaining your career after all these years. you have managed to embrace the digital format better than i have been able to. thanks for taking the time to be here. i had a great experience when i did my Q&A here...best of luck with your time here and hope you have as much fun as i did.

more and more i'm getting sessions that have 100 or more tracks. and it seems people still expect you to complete a mix in the same time for less money but with double the amount of tracks. for me that equals less time for creativity. although i have a loose guideline as to how the sessions should be organized before they send them to me, i still end up spending too much time organizing. then everyone is asking to have revisions and that can go on indefinitely for as long as you let it...

so it got me thinking one day, would it be fair to scale the mix rate according to the amount of tracks? how many revisions do you do for "free"? where do you draw the line? and how do you feel about printing stems for clients?

BTW, i still mix OTB and still use tape (2" and 1/2") for about 85% of my work.

all the best
__________________
russ elevado
Russell Elevado is offline  
Old 3rd March 2009   #2
Gear Head
 
Tony Maserati's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 73

Quote:
Originally Posted by Russell Elevado View Post
hello tony,

major props for maintaining your career after all these years. you have managed to embrace the digital format better than i have been able to. thanks for taking the time to be here. i had a great experience when i did my Q&A here...best of luck with your time here and hope you have as much fun as i did.

more and more i'm getting sessions that have 100 or more tracks. and it seems people still expect you to complete a mix in the same time for less money but with double the amount of tracks. for me that equals less time for creativity. although i have a loose guideline as to how the sessions should be organized before they send them to me, i still end up spending too much time organizing. then everyone is asking to have revisions and that can go on indefinitely for as long as you let it...

so it got me thinking one day, would it be fair to scale the mix rate according to the amount of tracks? how many revisions do you do for "free"? where do you draw the line? and how do you feel about printing stems for clients?

BTW, i still mix OTB and still use tape (2" and 1/2") for about 85% of my work.

all the best

Hey Russ,
Wow! Still using analog tape and mixing to 1/2 inch! Whoa! I can't imagine doing that.

My assistant and I tag team on the bigger sessions to get the 'prep time' done as fast as we can. Luckily it's not that often. (I jus had one that was over 250 tho. I had to spend hours bouncing vocals into stems jus to get the thing to fit into 192 voices!!!!) We tried the setup guidelines for clients and that jus didn't work... Although, I do know a particular mixer who can do that...

Regarding the issue of track count/dollar; lots of my colleagues are doing different things. If they have a studio they may charge for all the additional studio time to make changes, or rental fees for the esoteric equipment... That being said, I'd love to think there's an equitable situation to be worked out, but there never is. Our business is about tallying it all up at the end of the year (or end of a career) and hope it comes out on the plus side. ... and even if/wen i try to do that, the details are so mushed up in me brain, I'd rather take the day off, I've given myself, and get a beer with friends.

I say it over an over, make the best deal you can at the time, hopefully you've charged the 'problem' client a bit extra for your time. In the end you still deliver top professional quality and creativity you can... If you dig going into work more than 65-75% of the time, yer way ahead.

Enjoy,
t
__________________
Tony Maserati

http://www.tonymaserati.com
Tony Maserati is offline  
Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
DAW that works fast, smooth, with power, at 24/96 and 100 tracks? brutze Music Computers 4 31st March 2008 01:45 PM
Daking: Comments on revisions Local 47 High end 1 15th December 2006 05:03 PM
How many Neve 1073 revisions? alexstringer High end 0 5th April 2006 11:09 PM
Recs for DAW/system that can support 100+ Tracks at 24 bit, 96k and VST plugs savoysavvy Music Computers 26 29th March 2006 12:09 PM
Dealing with phase issues on Stereo acoustic guitar tracks infiniteposse So much gear, so little time! 8 20th March 2004 03:10 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:08 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.