![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear nut Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 107
Thread Starter | Which samplerate is most common?
Hi Michael and thank you for doing this, There's ton's of posts in recording forums regarding samplerates, i.e. if 192khz does sound better than 96khz etc... Do you get to mix records that are done on 44.1 or 48khz? What is your stand on this subject, do you prefer 192khz on 96khz? Thanks (sorry for the clumsy english, it's not my native language) Eldad |
| |
| | #2 |
| Past Guest Moderator Joined: Sep 2005 Location: nyc
Posts: 222
|
i can say without hesitation that 192khz sounds better and i prefer it. I mostly get 48/96. But when i get 192 the sound is so much more open and natural. I wish it were the standard.
|
| |
| | #3 |
| Gear nut Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 107
Thread Starter |
Thanks!
|
| |
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Eulogy to Common Sense | Remoteness | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 12 | 7th January 2012 02:28 PM |
| spx90 common problems?? | logicll | Geekslutz forum | 1 | 21st June 2006 04:58 PM |
| What does DigiDesign and Denon have in common? | ShamansDream | The Moan Zone | 0 | 12th March 2006 07:21 PM |
| Using low samplerate to optimize analog comp attack | OberHeim-Kenobi | High end | 6 | 13th February 2006 01:07 AM |
| |