Login / Register
 
Wide mixes
Subscribe
especht
Thread Starter
#1
5th February 2007
Old 5th February 2007
  #1
Gear Head
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 45

Thread Starter
especht is offline
Wide mixes

Hi, Kevin. Thank you for taking our questions.

In an earlier post you said, "I can spend a number of hours experimenting with this even pushing the width of the mix beyond the normal L R plane."

Could you elaborate on this?
#2
7th February 2007
Old 7th February 2007
  #2
engineer / producer / mixer
 
Kevin Killen's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 313

Kevin Killen is offline
especht,

I may pick one or two elements and run it thru my Howard Hughes SRS spatial box. It was designed for cockpit voice recognition and it totally ****s with the phase. Sometimes I would put a number of effects in series, ultimately ending in the SRS and adjust the "width" control so that it appeared outside the speakers, to the left and right of the outermost edge of the speakers. Its certainly fun,not mono compatible and usually gives the artist a woody and the mastering engineers a feeling of naseau.

Don't try this if your project is going to vinyl....

In the DAW world, same principle, just try using the S1 image maker .

On headphones , its like someone is turning your brain inside out....

And put down that weed , when you do this, It may alter your life forever



KK
#3
7th February 2007
Old 7th February 2007
  #3
Lives for Jesus
 
stevep's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: orange county ca.
Posts: 2,934

stevep is offline
Talking

Quote:
I may pick one or two elements and run it thru my Howard Hughes SRS spatial box. It was designed for cockpit voice recognition and it totally ****s with the phase
Nice !!!! cant stop laughing,.... great post



thanks for sharing your experience with us


peace,


steve perkins


.
#4
7th February 2007
Old 7th February 2007
  #4
Lives for gear
 
dokushoka's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: San Francisco / L.A.
Posts: 1,092

Send a message via AIM to dokushoka
dokushoka is offline
I had that Hughes box! It was so weird!
#5
7th February 2007
Old 7th February 2007
  #5
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle

Shawn1272 is offline
Can you tell us some more about this SRS spatial box? Sounds pretty sweet.

thanks.
__________________
www.shawnsimmonsmusic.com
#6
7th February 2007
Old 7th February 2007
  #6
Gear addict
 
seb37000's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: france
Posts: 443

seb37000 is offline
Hello kevin,

Thanks for sharing all this !

Which elements of the mix do you find pushing the width works best on ?
#7
7th February 2007
Old 7th February 2007
  #7
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Orlando
Posts: 3,926
My Recordings/Credits

Methlab is offline
Kevin,

When you say 1 or 2 elements..what are you usually going with? Something like a pad or background vocal?

How much is too much when it comes to spreading things out like this in your experience?
__________________
Professionally played Basslines starting at $35 a Track. www.professionalbassguitar.com
#8
7th February 2007
Old 7th February 2007
  #8
engineer / producer / mixer
 
Kevin Killen's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 313

Kevin Killen is offline
SRS THREADS

Usually its either backgrounds or maybe just the effects i use on them, sometimes a volume swell, a weird percussion moment, just some "ear candy".

#9
8th February 2007
Old 8th February 2007
  #9
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle

Shawn1272 is offline
Kevin, thanks for the info. Are you using the SRS Labs MegaWide box? I'm curious what box you're actually using to get "outside the speakers".

shawn
#10
10th February 2007
Old 10th February 2007
  #10
engineer / producer / mixer
 
Kevin Killen's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 313

Kevin Killen is offline
Shawn

I am not using it this week as my current project is in the box. For that I use the Waves S1 Image maker.

I will pull the SRS out of its box next week to get the exact model numer.

Keep listening....

KK
#11
10th February 2007
Old 10th February 2007
  #11
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle

Shawn1272 is offline
Thanks Kevin.
#12
12th February 2007
Old 12th February 2007
  #12
Gear interested
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2

themish is offline
Hughes box

Hi kevin,

why can the hughes srs box not be used for tracks that will end up on vinyl? can the s1 be used for vinyl?

thanks,

h
#13
13th February 2007
Old 13th February 2007
  #13
engineer / producer / mixer
 
Kevin Killen's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 313

Kevin Killen is offline
themish,

Basically those boxes and software plug ins do alter the phase coherency of the stereo track. Trying to cut an acetate with such a significant phase anomaly would cause the cutting head to lift up during the mastering. It would mean a remix at the very least.

CD's are much more forgiving in terms of duplication.

Kevin
#14
13th February 2007
Old 13th February 2007
  #14
Gear addict
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 338

Fuel is offline
Thanks again!!
#15
13th February 2007
Old 13th February 2007
  #15
Gear addict
 
Ecktronic's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Location: Ayr, Scotland
Posts: 434

Ecktronic is offline
Hey Kevin,
Would it be normal to use a stereo expander on guitars alone? Its just that when listening to some CD's guitars sound alot wider than mine do.

Cheers,
Eck
#16
13th February 2007
Old 13th February 2007
  #16
Gear addict
 
Ecktronic's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Location: Ayr, Scotland
Posts: 434

Ecktronic is offline
When listening to the band "Deftones" I notice that the guitars sound a bit wider compared to my mixes. Would using a stereo expander like "Waves Imager" on the guitars alone be a good idea to acheive a wider stereo spread? Or would this muck about with the phasing too much?

Cheers,
Eck
#17
14th February 2007
Old 14th February 2007
  #17
engineer / producer / mixer
 
Kevin Killen's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 313

Kevin Killen is offline
Ectronic,

Not to sound evasive, I guess one could but what the result would be is totally dependent on the input source and tha application itself.

Might be better off trying to discern what it is you like about the guitars you describe, tone, parts, position and see if you can come close to replicating them in your own music.

Kevin
#18
21st February 2007
Old 21st February 2007
  #18
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle

Shawn1272 is offline
Kevin, did you get a chance to pull out your SRS box yet? I'm dying to know what it is.

thanks,
shawn
#19
23rd February 2007
Old 23rd February 2007
  #19
engineer / producer / mixer
 
Kevin Killen's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 313

Kevin Killen is offline
Shawn,

Not yet as that session got postponed, but i should be able to get it this weekend. keep bugging me, Iam happy to reveal whatever it is.

KK
#20
26th February 2007
Old 26th February 2007
  #20
engineer / producer / mixer
 
Kevin Killen's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 313

Kevin Killen is offline
okay its an SRS AK -100

kev
#21
26th February 2007
Old 26th February 2007
  #21
engineer / producer / mixer
 
Kevin Killen's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 313

Kevin Killen is offline
okay its an SRS AK -100

kev
#22
26th February 2007
Old 26th February 2007
  #22
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 1,990

Killahurts is offline
Oh, how I loved that box! But like an idiot I sold it a few years ago...

At the time it came out, the other thing out there was the Bedini Audio Spacial environment (BASE). I liked the AK-100 better, and it was way cheaper. It has a sort of gritty warmth to it - and as was stated earlier, it's best used on elements, not an entire mix, IMO.

btw Kevin, this is my first post in your guest forum. Thank you Soooo much for doing this with us!
__________________
As you can imagine, the audio that came out did not sound like the audio that went in. Silly analog.- Steven Slate
#23
26th February 2007
Old 26th February 2007
  #23
Lives for gear
 
Joined: May 2006
Location: Haifa,Israel
Posts: 1,288

Tomer1 is offline
It may seem out of place but to me it seems funny to use high end convertors and a million dollar console only to end up degrading the final signal with a 40$ unit


Whats the N:S ratio on that thing
#24
3rd March 2007
Old 3rd March 2007
  #24
Gear Head
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 48

Send a message via AIM to Cymbals Send a message via Yahoo to Cymbals
Cymbals is offline
s1

When doing the same thing in-box, using Waves s1, are you talking about the width control, or are you also adjusting symmetry control also? I'm just making sure I'm understanding you correctly. No flipping of tracks, and phase, then, right?
#25
3rd March 2007
Old 3rd March 2007
  #25
engineer / producer / mixer
 
Kevin Killen's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 313

Kevin Killen is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomer1 View Post
It may seem out of place but to me it seems funny to use high end convertors and a million dollar console only to end up degrading the final signal with a 40$ unit


Whats the N:S ratio on that thing
That is often the irony of mixing but you just have to use your ears to judge what is right for the mix. But probably no worse than the $35 foot pedal you use for the guitar or the $300 speakers you mix thru !

No idea ... sorry

Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn  Submit Thread to Google+ Google+ 
 
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter / Forum
Replies
logicll / So much gear, so little time!
16
Yiannis / So much gear, so little time!
3

Forum Jump

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.