![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| If SSL consoles are the Holy Grail, why aren't SSL channel strips | AlanTide | So much gear, so little time! | 39 | 9th April 2008 09:08 PM |
| New SSL consoles at REAL WORLD STUDIOS | Shaman | New product alert! | 19 | 21st March 2006 11:54 AM |
| WAVES SSL 4000 DEMO IS BACK!!! YOUR THOUGHTS!!!! | KP2006 | New product alert! | 75 | 11th February 2006 05:49 AM |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Louisiana
Posts: 297
| Your thoughts on SSL consoles? Awesome glad to see you here. The mixes you did for Gina I really liked. Favorite SSL console? Tell us your thoughts on the different models. Also you mixed on Gina's SE a bit. How did you use the extra cue send bus? Are you a motors on or off mixer? Thanks again Kevin |
| |
| | #2 |
| engineer / producer / mixer Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 312
| Thanks for having me. I have no real problem with SSL's . I have used them to great effect over the years ( see the thread on "So", considered by many to be a great sounding album and that was recorded and mixed on a E series !) But my favs are the E and the J series. In terms of differences, to me the G just sounding a little harsh, the E was more musical than the G, the J has more openess in the top but it has a limit to how hard you can push the output, it closes down very fast above +2. Extra cue send bus gets used on a need too basis, but no real default position for me on that. When it comes to automation I have the motors on, I think it sounds better ! Rockin on kk |
| |
| | #3 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Louisiana
Posts: 297
| Thanks Kevin! |
| |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |