Mixing for MP3 - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > Expert Question & Answer Archives (read only archive, not open for new posts) > Q & A with Dave Pensado

Mixing for MP3

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 1st September 2008   #1
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,191

Thread Starter
Mixing for MP3

in your interview from 2006 in electronic musician you said that you will start
to mix specifically for mp3;

what are your findings since this time till now?
lllubi is offline  
Old 6th September 2008   #2
Guest Moderator - September 08
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: los angeles
Posts: 122

I wish I could report that I have made great progress, but I just can't find the time. If you guys have some insights, please share them with us. To start let's list our favorite MP3 makers (conversion software). I just do it in PT, bounce to disk and export as an MP3. I gotta figure this out. Thanks for the question.
Dave Pensado is offline  
Old 6th September 2008   #3
Gear Head
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 32

I mix on a pc using cubase, (one of the few I would imagine). I don't hate the MP3 compression straight out of cubase, but I do notice the difference when using LAME,
At the mo I'm using WinLAME as it is a very easy to use and sounds great. :-)
As far as mixing for a MP3 format, knowing the MP3's will be sold online and played in clubs, personally I try to keep the highends as detailed in the mix, pulling a bit more high end out of pads and strings giving this area space for percussive transients (house music at the mo has a huge amount of transient click on percussion, TransX, Transient Designer aided).
I think as MP3 causes a bit more blending to occour you just need to mix with a bit more space (so easy to say, so hard to do, haha)
Well that's what i have found on it. :-)

O
The Scientist
TheScientist is offline  
Old 6th September 2008   #4
Gear Head
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 40

I have noticed that different bitrates can effect the overall mix,
reducing or accentuating the bass and/or treble in the mix.

I can't imagine mixing differently,except corrective EQ at or post
mastering to compensate.

Scott Alger

Parkside Studio, Chicago
Scott Alger is offline  
Old 6th September 2008   #5
Gear maniac
 
johnbohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 251

Send a message via AIM to johnbohn
I found out if you filter out everything above 18k or so and don't do any stereo widening and other spatial things, you don't get nearly as much of the garble. I also dip around 50hz about a db and half.

Obviously I print normal mixes first and then do this.
__________________
"Technological progress is like an axe in the hands of a pathological criminal."

http://www.JohnBohnAudio.com
http://www.myspace.com/johnbohnaudio

http://www.AudioEngineerMag.com
johnbohn is offline  
Old 6th September 2008   #6
Gear addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: London
Posts: 493

I find LAME mp3 encoding sounds best.
explorer is offline  
Old 6th September 2008   #7
Lives for gear
 
kittonian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 4,324

Hey Dave,

If you haven't already done so, check out this software called Barbabatch from Audio Ease. You can download the LAME codec for MP3 purposes for free and the software is really good.

Here's a link to all the specifics: BarbaBatch

I've been using it for all my conversion and I have to say, I really think it sounds better than any other software conversion (including PT|HD in Tweakhead mode) that I've tried.
__________________
Joshua Aaron
President/Chief Engineer
AudioLot/AudioLot Studios
High End Pro Audio Sales & Consulting
Recording/Music Production/Mixing

http://www.audiolot.com

Follow AudioLot on Facebook for AudioLot's BIG DEAL Gear Specials, Morning Mix Tips, and more by clicking here

AudioLot is located in Hollywood, CA.

If you're in the LA area and are interested in coming by to see any of the gear we carry in person, please let us know.
kittonian is offline  
Old 6th September 2008   #8
Lives for gear
 
Franco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Not working on music, which is were I SHOULD be.
Posts: 1,189

Wouldn't this be like saying "I've got all this great gear and high resolution, I'm going to mix specifically for cassette tape."

MP3 as a format is designed to shave off what the encoder considers unnecessary frequencies, and how can you mix for something that degrades your audio?

I feel that if you have great mixes to begin with, and encode at a high kbps rate (320 for example), your MP3s will sound close to the original mix, almost as good. This is what I've learned on my own, but I may be wrong and there may be a trick to making better mixes for a format that degrades your audio, I don't know.
Franco is offline  
Old 6th September 2008   #9
Gear maniac
 
duckyboard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: boston
Posts: 233

I prefer Sample Manager for all file conversion, bit-rate, and sample-rate conversion.


Audiofile Engineering - Sample Manager

Check it out!
__________________
http://duckyboard.com
duckyboard is offline  
Old 6th September 2008   #10
Gear nut
 
Chris Doremus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North Hollywood, CA
Posts: 123

Great Plugin Idea

That gives me a great idea. A plugin that emulates the sound of MP3 conversions!!! The "MP3-erizer" Copyright, ME!!!
__________________
C-H-R-I-S
Chris Doremus is offline  
Old 7th September 2008   #11
Gear Guru
 
rickrock305's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Miami FL
Posts: 10,060

I use a program called Snapper to convert MP3s. It uses the LAME encoder, which from all accounts I've read seems to be the best one going.

I think iTunes is probably one of the worst.
__________________
Stuff for sale

Korg TR Rack
JV Expansion Cards-HipHop, World, Latin, Country
SRX Expansion Cards-Symphonique Strings, Complete Orchestra, Dynamic Drums, Platinum Trax,

Thread with pics...
http://www.gearslutz.com/board/gears...ion-cards.html

www.rbmixing.com
rickrock305 is offline  
Old 7th September 2008   #12
Lives for gear
 
E.rOk.stA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: 'da Pitts, PA
Posts: 2,634

I do almost the same thing. I read in an audio mastering handbook that the higher frequencies is what is harder to encode and translate when transferring mp3's over the internet. For that reason, I use a low pass filter and shelf off everything above 18.5 cycles. It seems to do the trick. I dunno, anyone else?
Peace
E.rOk.stA is offline  
Old 7th September 2008   #13
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: East Coast
Posts: 16

Send a message via AIM to traknologist Send a message via Yahoo to traknologist
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Pensado View Post
I wish I could report that I have made great progress, but I just can't find the time. If you guys have some insights, please share them with us. To start let's list our favorite MP3 makers (conversion software). I just do it in PT, bounce to disk and export as an MP3. I gotta figure this out. Thanks for the question.
My favorite software for mp3's is Wavelab, but I normally bounce to disk straight from the daw as mp3. I'm also slowly but surely making most projects mp3.
__________________
Top Notch Trak
www.myspace.com/thetraknologist
www.traknologist.com
traknologist is offline  
Old 7th September 2008   #14
soulstudios
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Red face

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Pensado View Post
I wish I could report that I have made great progress, but I just can't find the time. If you guys have some insights, please share them with us. To start let's list our favorite MP3 makers (conversion software). I just do it in PT, bounce to disk and export as an MP3. I gotta figure this out. Thanks for the question.
lame[/B].sourceforge.net]Lame is far and away the best MP3 encoder out there, from both objective and subjective internet tests. If you want to make an MP3 that sounds as close to the original PCM as possible, try encoding with the razorlame[/B]]Razorlame tool, go to options and set the q-value to 0, bitrate to CBR 320 (I hate VBR - it always introduces a slightly 'fuzzy' sound from the constantly shifting quality-level, from my experience), and checkbox 'disable all filtering' in the Expert tab (this preserves all frequencies, at least before the encoding phase - this means that some of the hi end doesn't get rolled off - unimportant to most people who can't hear it - but important to me).
Don't want to disable filtering at lower bitrates though, you'll lose clarity in other sections of audio due to less audible frequencies consuming more of your available mp3 bandwidth...
With MP3 a bit of high end always gets lost or smudged, however you encode it though. So if your mix is sounding a little bright, congrats - it'll get fixed in the encoding phase -

Hope this is useful to someone.
Matt
 
Old 7th September 2008   #15
Lives for gear
 
taturana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Posts: 4,043

i've been pretty sucessful with the newest lame codec... either in wavelab or mp3converter PRO, which is very parctical too...
taturana is offline  
Old 7th September 2008   #16
Lives for gear
 
ProducerBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Here, There, and Everywhere.
Posts: 1,579

Jimmy Douglass was saying he has started mixing in 88.2 for this reason. He felt that his mixes translated better from 88.2 to mp3.
__________________
Sugar Hill Studios
ProducerBoy is offline  
Old 7th September 2008   #17
Lives for gear
 
Rednose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,439

I've found using wavelab with the "Fraunhofer" codec produces good results.
Rednose is offline  
Old 7th September 2008   #18
Lives for gear
 
neilio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,324

i really really like aac, i find it to be musical, and the best relatively of course, i havent the time to really get into the flacs/ogg vorbis/apple lossless yet...

but 192 aac seems to be a very very good compromise, of quality...
neilio is offline  
Old 8th September 2008   #19
Gear nut
 
Edge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Midwest
Posts: 116

Send a message via AIM to Edge Send a message via Yahoo to Edge
I have had good results with wave lab conversion, on a mac I use Itunes
Edge is offline  
Old 8th September 2008   #20
Gear addict
 
BobbyPeru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 404

I think a better question is: How do I optimize mixes for Myspace compression? Some tracks on Myspace just slam other do not sound as well. I don't believe its totally the all out quality of the recordings either.

Both of these seem to be questions that would be better off addressed by Mastering engineers though. I don't know if we necessarily have to change our mixes for MP3 or Myspace, they may need to be mastered differently with that intent though. Like if you're doing an LP and CD release the masters would probably emphasize certain aspects to maximize both mediums.

Bobby Peru
Milwaukee, WI
BobbyPeru is offline  
Old 8th September 2008   #21
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 166

David Ben gave a lecture at my school where he was talking about focusing on mixing for mp3 and showed us some pretty decent work. I don't remember what software he said he used unfortunately. I think he still mixes analog for the mp3 stuff as well.
m. chan is offline  
Old 8th September 2008   #22
Lives for gear
 
Beyersound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Vegas, Norcal
Posts: 3,605

I usually use the one in Cubase SX it has been good for sending test mixes to clients. There are also 2 or 3 in Nero, I use them at times and they are really good. Choices are a great thing!
__________________
Congratulations 2010 World Champion SF Giants!!!

"There is no crying in baseball, there are no rules in recording!!!"
www.myspace.com/beyeraudio

Michael Beyer
Beyersound is offline  
Old 8th September 2008   #23
Gear addict
 
edit machine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 390

for nice sounding mp3's at any bitrate, but especially low rez like 128 Kbps, you just can't beat the LAME mp3 encoder. it's magic.

Read about it here: LAME MP3 Encoder

Find links to software that uses it here: LAME MP3 Encoder :: Related Links

My fav app for it that works in Itunes: LAME MP3 Encoder :: Related Links
__________________
IMDB
WEB
edit machine is offline  
Old 8th September 2008   #24
Gear maniac
 
messiahwannabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 170

one simple trick for me (not having the digidesign plugin) - it you export your track to 48khz instead of 41 (cd quality) then convert to mp3, it sounds noticeably better.
messiahwannabe is offline  
Old 8th September 2008   #25
Gear addict
 
farjedi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 487

I'm no expert but on Beatport they use LAME which they say is the best Mp3 conversion software...I would like to know also which is the best..haven't tried LAME but if anyone has please comment...
farjedi is offline  
Old 8th September 2008   #26
Gear nut
 
Idiophonic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: NYC
Posts: 116

I've used the MP3 conversion in Logic Pro, it seems to sound as good as an MP3 can sound...

I've gotten good results by trying to compensate for what the MP3 algorithm favors. These may be very general statements, but I think most mp3 codecs select for the mid-range frequencies preferentially over the lows and highs, resulting, to my ears, in a very mid-heavy sound. (Vocals suddenly jump out, maybe the snare drum gets louder, etc.)

I put an EQ on the 2-buss and gently scoop btw 1-5 kHz (with a low Q) and slightly boost the high frequencies. Doing this (and adjusting through a few EQ/bounce attempts) I've managed to get some mp3s sounding very close to the wav files, at least in terms of overall frequency balance.

Anyone else find themselves doing this? (pre-emphasis od deemphasis of freqs before mp3 conversion?)
Idiophonic is offline  
Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mixing to MP3? Chapiro So much gear, so little time! 12 25th September 2007 06:01 PM
Mixing for MP3 - This is what we have been reduced to! Resonant Alien So much gear, so little time! 0 12th July 2007 03:19 PM
Mixing to the MP3 SoulSpace So much gear, so little time! 6 1st October 2006 12:24 AM
Mixing for .mp3 RadioMoo Mastering forum 5 7th August 2006 01:16 AM
Mixing for mp3 output john caldwell So much gear, so little time! 1 4th January 2006 01:12 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:15 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com Limited - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office: 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.