![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Avalon 747 - Api 2500 - Distressor or Drawmer 1968 | dimme3 | So much gear, so little time! | 32 | 26th February 2007 05:47 PM |
| A second distressor or a 1176/ C2/ API 2500? | John_McEnroe | High end | 8 | 19th August 2006 05:45 AM |
| Fatso & api 2500 | ray dsr | Q&A with Dave Derr (the designer of the Distressor compressor) | 3 | 1st June 2003 06:42 AM |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Gear maniac | fatso/distressor vs. api 2500 hi dave, i'm demo-ing the api 2500 in my studio this week. i'm looking for a mix-buss compressor to replace my finalizer compression (i'm still planning to use the finalizer for converters). i like the api 2500 a lot. i haven't had a chance to hear the fatso. do they compare? thanks! |
| |
| | #2 |
| 3 + infractions, membership under review with GS admin Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Foxboro, MA USA
Posts: 5,783
| I'm not Dave... nor do I play Dave on TV... but I have tried both units in that application and can emphatically state that there is absolutely no comparison between the two. They're two radically different animals. Using them both is a sound... using them individually is a sound... comparing the sounds? Not possible.
__________________ [COLOR="White"][/COLOR] [SIZE="2"][b]Fletcher[/b][/SIZE] If you have a question please email me at [email]Fletcher@mercenary.com[/email] instead of using the PM system... I very rarely check that system and it could take a while to get a response. I can also be found at either address below: [size=2][url=http://recforums.prosoundweb.com][b]R/E/P[/b][/url][/size] the [b]R[/b]ecording [b]E[/b]ngineer and [b]P[/b]roducer forums [url=http://www.mercenary.com][b]Mercenary Audio[/b][/url] [size=1][b]mwagener wrote on Sat, 11 September 2004 14:33[/b] We are selling emotions, there are no emotions in a grid [b][url=http://www.ericambel.com/index.htm]Roscoe[/url] Ambel once said[/b]: Pro-Tools is to audio what fluorescent is to light[/size] |
| |
| | #3 |
| Gear maniac | I had a feeling that would be the answer. That tape saturation thing sounds fun, though I must admit that I hate the idea of "emulators". If a box has one killer sound, that's fine with me. How would you compare the api 2500 to it's closest contenders? I haven't had a chance to hear the Smart C2 or the Crane Song STC-8. Thanks. |
| |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |