Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > Expert Question & Answer Archives (read only archive, not open for new posts) > Q&A with Charles Dye

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tracking sounds into Logic. Serious A/D tracking mysteries. Need some help. Mitch Lowen Music computers 1 1st March 2006 03:39 AM
Tracking sounds into Logic. Serious A/D tracking mysteries. Need some help. Mitch Lowen Low End Theory 3 28th February 2006 05:38 PM
Charles djui5 Q&A with Charles Dye 11 29th May 2004 11:30 PM
Plugin "Tracking" question for Charles no ssl yet Q&A with Charles Dye 1 14th April 2004 01:37 PM
THANK YOU CHARLES 5down1up Expert Question & Answer Archives (read only archive, not open for new posts) 3 29th November 2002 05:20 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 20th April 2004, 10:31 PM   #1
djui5
Lives for gear
 
djui5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 6,681
Send a message via Yahoo to djui5
Tracking...Charles

Charles,
You speak of only mixing in the box but I was curious what you do on the way in? I track to the computer a lot but use a ton of outboard gear on the way in so that after tracking the mix is half way there or so....do you also do this? Or is your focus on getting a really good sound using mic placement rather than tweaking on the way in? Like using lot's of room mic's and just using pre's on the way in?

Sorry if you've allready answered this, I didn't do a search..
__________________
_________________

"What is a crossfire hurricane & why wasn't I born in one?"

Randy Wright
http://www.myspace.com/djui5
djui5 is offline  
Old 20th April 2004, 11:44 PM   #2
no ssl yet
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
FUNNY I was wonwdering the same thing

Charles, what do you do if you get a song that's not tracked so well
Do you stay with just plugs?
I'm gonna add 2 Amek CIB's to my set up this week and when I get poorly tracked stuff, I'll use the CIB's and process 2 tracks at a time till I get something that is decent. For me plugins dont make up for a poorly tracked front end , so I'm gonna involve more outboard processing
 
Old 23rd April 2004, 09:31 AM   #3
djui5
Lives for gear
 
djui5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 6,681
Send a message via Yahoo to djui5
bump....
__________________
_________________

"What is a crossfire hurricane & why wasn't I born in one?"

Randy Wright
http://www.myspace.com/djui5
djui5 is offline  
Old 23rd April 2004, 10:19 AM   #4
Charles Dye
FX smörgåsbord user
 
Charles Dye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Hollywood, FL
Posts: 883
Randy,

Sorry for the delay. Re your question: I agree with your approach. I'm a very big believer in getting the sound of an instrument as close as I can to how I want it to be in the mix when recording. Mic selection, placement + preamp selection are all critical, but I'll definitely use compression + eq when tracking drums, precussion, bass, gtr, keys (piano, organ, synth), + horns. With vocals I prefer to only compress + never eq while recording. It makes it much easier to match their sound for additional overdubs.

I never try to do in PT what I could before getting there. All analog v. digital issues aside I use the same philosphy presently when tracking to analog tape or previously when I used to record to digital tape. Why should you put it off? Get it sounding great now. One of my biggest reasons is that the musicians feed off of what they hear when tracking + overdubbing. The better the tracks sound, the more inspired they will be to give great performances.
__________________
Turn Me Up!™ – Bringing Dynamics Back to Music (TurnMeUp.org)

Facebook | MiLaR Forum | MySpace | MiLaR | PSN | Projects | MiLaR Workshop

Charles Dye is offline  
Old 23rd April 2004, 10:23 AM   #5
Charles Dye
FX smörgåsbord user
 
Charles Dye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Hollywood, FL
Posts: 883
NSY,

I find when I get tracks that aren't recorded that well that I can do everything I want to them sonically between DUY, McDSP + Waves plugs. I've never had to run a track out to analog to process it.

Can you give me an example of tracks that you would have to process analog?

Thanks.
__________________
Turn Me Up!™ – Bringing Dynamics Back to Music (TurnMeUp.org)

Facebook | MiLaR Forum | MySpace | MiLaR | PSN | Projects | MiLaR Workshop

Charles Dye is offline  
Old 23rd April 2004, 12:43 PM   #6
no ssl yet
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
examples

Charles, I guess what I'm saying is that when I get stuff that isn't tracked all that well, I kinda find myself wishing for certain pieces that I've used with success in the past at other peoples rooms. For instance I used to have a pair of distressors and I often find myself missing a way to get the sound that I could easily get with the Distressors.

Also I don't have the duy stuff. May have to look into it

Man I don't get into the digital/ analog debates but I notice a drastic difference in my sound since I added a folcrom and began to sum outside of the box. My mix plus rig is giving me so much more of the sound that I want. I never had analog channel (other than a Mc DSP demo) either so maybe I"m just substituting for what can be done with plugins, but with the price of a folcrom @ $750 I simply view it as an analog plugin that requires no DSP
 
Old 23rd April 2004, 06:36 PM   #7
Charles Dye
FX smörgåsbord user
 
Charles Dye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Hollywood, FL
Posts: 883
NSY,

If it works for you, great. But yes, if it weren't for DUY's DaD Valve + DaD Tape and McDSP's Analog Channel I'm sure I would be looking elsewhere for the warmth + punch that these plugs allow me to add to lackluster tracks.

It seems like we agree that saturation is essential to mixing, no matter where you get it.
__________________
Turn Me Up!™ – Bringing Dynamics Back to Music (TurnMeUp.org)

Facebook | MiLaR Forum | MySpace | MiLaR | PSN | Projects | MiLaR Workshop

Charles Dye is offline  
Old 23rd April 2004, 08:26 PM   #8
Curve Dominant
Lives for gear
 
Curve Dominant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: PHITOWN
Posts: 1,925
Charles.

Do you ever re-amp tracks to get a bigger/better sound?

I've been meaning to re-amp a few guitar tracks I originally recorded direct in, but not sure how to set it up with the 001.
Curve Dominant is offline  
Old 23rd April 2004, 11:40 PM   #9
djui5
Lives for gear
 
djui5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 6,681
Send a message via Yahoo to djui5
Thanks Charles for taking the time to respond...
__________________
_________________

"What is a crossfire hurricane & why wasn't I born in one?"

Randy Wright
http://www.myspace.com/djui5
djui5 is offline  
Old 23rd April 2004, 11:58 PM   #10
Extreme Mixing
Gear nut
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 130
Quote:
Originally posted by Charles Dye
NSY,

I find when I get tracks that aren't recorded that well that I can do everything I want to them sonically between DUY, McDSP + Waves plugs. I've never had to run a track out to analog to process it.

Can you give me an example of tracks that you would have to process analog?

Thanks.
Charles,

One sound that I sometimes go out of the box for is a 160x on the snare. It's just a great sound and sometimes, it's worth it to me to re-record the snare. It takes about four minutes, so when I want it, it's easy enough to get.

Steve
__________________
Steve
Extreme Mixing is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0