![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| how do you PAN?? | eligit | So much gear, so little time! | 22 | 16th May 2005 05:34 AM |
| So what do you pan to the center? | guittarzzan | Q&A with Charles Dye | 6 | 7th April 2004 05:07 PM |
| How would you pan this mix? | rainsinvelvet | So much gear, so little time! | 10 | 21st October 2003 07:48 AM |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,335
| Hey, Peter Pan... I've been working on a mix for this pop-rock-retro song "Hey, Peter Pan" and since Charles offered to comment on mixes, I'm throwing it up here. It's pretty much a 70s type song (most of mine are, but I call it Americana to fake that modern touch). The only thing not 70s is the snare, which is definitely an 80s feel. I used Telecaster for the hooky riff that comes at the end of the intro.(twango, twango, twank.) Used another Telecaster track for some rhythm. Used a Les Paul for the short lead break, and another rhythm. Bass, drums (Ric Furley on that), Fat Strat for slide guitar. Used a tambo in some parts, as well as a cowbell to imitate the clock sound that comes from the crocodile chasing down Captain Hook. (Basically, this is a song about the Peter Pan Syndrome -- or male midlife crisis -- but I use as many metaphors from the story of Peter Pan as possible. So the Crock represents age, Hook represents death, Wendy the ex-wife, Tinker Bell youth, bla, bla, bla.) And I got this all into a 2:20 song. Something to be said for that. Guitars were tracked through a Drawmer 1969 from SM57s for the retro sound. Vocals were tracked through a Neumann U87, to Great River Preamp, to 1176. Everything goes through an Apogee PSX100, so I only track two channels at once. Drums were recorded live, then SoundReplaced. I close mic the kick and the snare on two separate tracks, then Ric overdubs cymbals and toms. He's good and he's patient. The lead vocal is a scratch, a hand-held U87 at omni position, to Great River, to 1176. Guess that's enough of a setup, huh Charles? I'd like to know if the bass is out enough, if the gutairs are too dry, if the snare is too loud, and if the damn thing works at all. http://www.deceptivesound.com/PeterPan.mp3 Jasper PS -- (Hey, Peter Pan Copyright 2004 by Mike Jasper) Old habits die hard. |
| |
| | #2 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 325
| I would have to comment on the vocals. I know you said it was a scratch so I'm sure you'll take care of what I'm about to say. You can hardly make out ANYTHING he says except for when he says "peter pan whatcha gonna do." So I would definitely work on annunciation because everything seems blurred and slurred together. Everything else seemed alright...but it's hard to comment when the vocals aren't finished yet. |
| |
| | #3 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,335
| Quote:
Besides, the vocal placement was well thought out, so if y'all treat this like you're listening to something in a foreign language, you'll get the gestalt. Maybe not the lyrics, but the sound. That said, if lyrics are important to the picture, here are the words: Hey, Peter Pan Never never land To the great abyss Drinking herbal tea With a Jr. Miss Might as well have been Any other babe They all seem the same To me anyway Chorus: There goes the knight Into middleage Lyin' in the dark Flyin' in a rage Hey, Peter Pan Watchya gonna do Wendy took the kids Tinker Bell is doomed. Think I'll fly away To another shore You know I pulled that trick Many times before Mr. Crockodile Swallowed up my time I hear the tickin' tock Sneakin' from behind. Repeat Chorus Rockin' to the beat Back in '64 Then the joker came and Rocked me out the door Wendy always said It would end like this No more wallowin' In the future tense. Repeat Chorus Just thought of something. The lack of lyrical clarity could also be an EQ problem. After all, what's to annunciate in the opening line, "Never never land." No hard consonants there. Jasper | |
| |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 634
| I like the track. Nice retro sound. I thought the guitar that does the shots behind the verses could come up. If you listen to the first guitar shot in verse 2 it sounds great, nice tone and nice level but then they kind of get wimpy and brings down the energy of the song. I know the vox are scratch. The words seem all slured together and it doesn't sound like its in english. Also thought the cowbell was a little loud in intro. I like the clean tone of the singer. Bass seems a bit low in my NS-10s. Or maybe its an eq thing. Hard to tell. Love the shaker at the end. Adds to the song. Cant wait to hear your next mix of this track. I was tappin' my foot. Shane |
| |
| | #5 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,335
| Shane writes: Quote:
Thanks, Shane. Especially the guitar comments. Didn't really notice that at all. Jasper | |
| |
| | #6 |
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| Something in the first gtr solo break makes the whole track seem to veer badly out of time - that needs fixing. Out of the JCMellencamp shool or rock....? Perhaps if you cut more verse words short to let the snare "pop through" more often it would make it more toe tapping.. Slurr less... or pick and choose your times carefully..view that vocal timing groove as a "pop science". Work it. |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear | Drums on the intro have some timing issues. I like the guitar tones!! And the song, well aranged everything seems to be in place and nothing is exagerated or in need of. But yeah, the timing on the intro (the drums only part) made me nervous ![]() |
| |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,335
| Yeah, there are definitely timing issues here. Started this song a couple of years ago on OS9 when I couldn't figure out how to use a midi click track. Pretty much gave up on it because of those timing problems, but heard it a month ago and thought, damn, I really like the guitar sounds. Now I'm trying to see if I can salvage this. Won't be easy. Guess I'll have to set up bars and beats to whatever I think might be right on the tempo (it's looking like 136... at times) and line it all up. If anybody has any good ideas about this, I'd be eager to hear them. Thanks for the comments, Jasper PS -- The timing issues aren't Ric the drummer's fault, it's Jasper the soundreplacer's fault. |
| |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear | I think it needs more cowbell...................................... ..
__________________ _________________ "What is a crossfire hurricane & why wasn't I born in one?" Randy Wright http://www.myspace.com/djui5 |
| |
| | #10 |
| Lives for gear | since your drums are very basic straight forward, I would suggest you making loops of the best played bars and copy , paste, copy paste.. you will keep some of the feel and have good timing. thats what we are doing with my album. I still think good timing is more important than good feel. It would be nice to have both, but if I had to chose.. I rather go with timing. |
| |
| | #11 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,335
| You're right, Jose. Cutting and pasting is what I'm doing right now. As to the cowbell, I'm not sold on the sound of mine. Anyboddy got an awesome 24-bit, 44.1hz cowbell sound they'd like to send me? Jasper |
| |
| | #12 |
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| Re timing issues, just isolate where the few very audible ones are and which player is making it sound 'off' and just go in and carefully edit that. No need to 'grid' it all... Keep overall feel / performance, fix a few 'trouble spots'. |
| | #13 |
| Lives for gear | why did you soundreplace the drums? for a retro sound I'd take the real drums. It's quite strange for me to hear such a nice guitar sound and then a drum-sound that seems to come out off an Alesis D4 Just a thought Jo |
| |
| | #14 |
| Lives for gear | Hey Jasper, if you get that cowbell can you send it to me to ??? Thanks : ) |
| |
| | #15 | ||
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,335
| Quote:
And the reason I'm limited to two channels is because I want to run everything in through the two-channel Apogee converters. The always cogent Jules writes: Quote:
Here's the great news. I gave up on this song around the time I first entered GearSlutz, when Charles Dye did his first guest moderator gig here. Putting the song away for a year and a half turned out to be a great idea, since I've learned so much here and I'm getting so much help from all y'all. Thanks, guys. Jasper | ||
| |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |