Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > Expert Question & Answer Archives (read only archive, not open for new posts) > Q&A with Charles Dye

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question about combining guitar power amps with the guitar pre amp Jason Poulin So much gear, so little time! 6 14th May 2007 10:41 PM
Any Producers use Midi Guitar or Actual Guitar or Mid Wind Controllers MACHINE Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production 1 22nd April 2006 04:07 PM
Guitar->DI->Nuendo->Real guitar amp in insert Luk3_c So much gear, so little time! 1 18th March 2006 04:51 PM
Neve Portico 5012 on Acoustic Guitar, Electric Guitar, Drum OH clips nukmusic So much gear, so little time! 6 2nd December 2005 08:05 PM
Possible way to remove 'fizz' from electric gtrs - via software / plug in Jules So much gear, so little time! 4 16th December 2004 08:03 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 18th April 2004, 03:15 AM   #1
xyz
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5
Guitar Fizz

When mixing heavy distorted guitars, how do you suggest getting rid of the fizz without destroying the presence? Basically, I play with the lowpass and try to add some mid/upper mids but it's always a struggle to really dial it in. Any tips?
xyz is offline  
Old 18th April 2004, 01:06 PM   #2
karl
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: London
Posts: 225
Try a low pass at 10 or 11k. But really it is in the recording phase. Move the mic away from the centre of the cone for less top end as a rule. Remember that most of the guitar tone is in the mid frequencies. By boosting something there you might reduce the fizz.
karl is offline  
Old 18th April 2004, 06:49 PM   #3
drew
Lives for gear
 
drew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Maryland,USA
Posts: 2,423
I find eq to be of little help when this happens. You need something like the Cranesong Phoenix or the Analog Channel stuff that effects the overall character. and yea, getting it right on the way in makes it all better!
drew is offline  
Old 18th April 2004, 09:06 PM   #4
imacgreg
Gear maniac
 
imacgreg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Silver Lake, LA
Posts: 294
Send a message via AIM to imacgreg
Mesa Double/Triple Rectifiers = FIZZ. Well... that's been the story of the project I'm, working on right now. The gtr players suck all the midrange out, boost the top and bottom almost all the way and crank the gain. Sounds good in the room with the amp, but that's Fletcher-Munson doing the work for ya. Miced in the CR it sounds like absolute ass.

My workaround has been lowering gain and bass on the amp (don't let the guitar player see you..) and I'm also running a JCM800 at the same time for some real midrange. It's still a balancing act because they want a big guitar sound, but scooped mids! Double/Triple tracking can be your friend. LP helps the fizz, but can make the guitars to dark. You want them in your face. Gotta try the analog channel...

Kinda went off topic...
Ian
__________________
----------
Ian MacGregor
www.standard-audio.com
imacgreg is offline  
Old 19th April 2004, 05:27 PM   #5
jbuntz
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,650
Ribbon mics or something else fat sounding. Low passing guitars makes them dull.
jbuntz is offline  
Old 21st April 2004, 10:31 PM   #6
Unknown soldier
Gear addict
 
Unknown soldier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: solar system
Posts: 441
I have the same issues micing a mesa studio preamp, 50/50 power amp and a recto 4/12. In the room, cranking the gain and treble knobs sound great, but when you mic it then it becomes too much fizz. The best way to deal with this, I've found, is to EQ out the fizz on the amp. May seem to kill the sound a bit to reduce the treble/upper mids, but makes the recording more tolerable. I also use the hi/lo console EQ on the ghost, which can act like high/low pass filters to some degree....

This is also where analog tape comes in handy - a mild automatic high end flattener. Digital makes it all apparent, in a less than glorious way....
Unknown soldier is online now  
Old 21st April 2004, 10:42 PM   #7
djui5
Lives for gear
 
djui5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 6,681
Send a message via Yahoo to djui5
I wouldn't mess with the guitar head.....if it's set the way the player likes it then leave it alone...don't change that to make up for your recording.

First task is to find the speaker you like the best....then use some good mic's and adjust the placement untill you get it where you want it.
Then if there's still problems then subtractive EQ'ing is your friend....
I wouldn't use a low pass filter...that's crazy. I find a lot of times I like more air on everything...and low pass filtering would kill that. I'd say find the freq that's bothering you and cut it out...
__________________
_________________

"What is a crossfire hurricane & why wasn't I born in one?"

Randy Wright
http://www.myspace.com/djui5
djui5 is offline  
Old 22nd April 2004, 12:47 AM   #8
Jules
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Fatso Jnr is what I use...

That and a Royer 121

PT / digital picks up WAY too much of the nasty 'paper tear' fizz

 
Old 22nd April 2004, 06:33 AM   #9
Mike Jasper
Lives for gear
 
Mike Jasper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,335
Could somebody post an mp3 of a guitar with fizz. I think I know what you're talking about, but I'd rather hear so I definitely know what you're talking about.

Jasper
Mike Jasper is offline  
Old 22nd April 2004, 08:19 AM   #10
-=glEnn=-
Gear nut
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Upplands Väsby, Sweden
Posts: 84
i like lowpassing around 6-9k and then boosting above the lowpass, like around 15k and up.
Kills the guitarfizz without dulling it!

/mike
-=glEnn=- is offline  
Old 22nd April 2004, 08:54 AM   #11
picksail
Lives for gear
 
picksail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Hollywood
Posts: 3,326
Try scooping discretely at 8/9k. Then add a gentle hi shelf at 15/16k, just for some air or presence.
__________________
Stewart Cararas
Seventh Level Productions
Myspace Profile
Discogs
_________________________________
The new is necessarily abstract - Rudolf Borchadt
picksail is offline  
Old 22nd April 2004, 09:53 AM   #12
karl
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: London
Posts: 225
Try recording a split from the guitar before the amp as well as the mic just getting the clean di guitar. Then when the fizz offender has left the studio you can re-amp the guitar. He'll probably take all the credit for a great tone, but at least you will have a good sound for the mix.
karl is offline  
Old 22nd April 2004, 10:07 AM   #13
Gie-Sound
Gear addict
 
Gie-Sound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The Netherlands (yes that's the country surrounding Amsterdam!)
Posts: 335
Sometime I like the Fizz....
(call me nuts)
__________________
*****
GRTX
GIE
**
_________________________________________
"If you can limit your choices so that every decision supports a specific production goal, that's what makes great records." [Geoff Emerick]
Gie-Sound is offline  
Old 22nd April 2004, 02:28 PM   #14
el cochino
Lives for gear
 
el cochino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Austria
Posts: 777
Quote:
Originally posted by Gie-Sound
Sometime I like the Fizz....
(call me nuts)
Me too - makes the guitars sound so dirrrty.
el cochino is offline  
Old 23rd April 2004, 08:56 PM   #15
ixnys
Gear addict
 
ixnys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 325
If you have a chance Charles could you chime in on this subject as well please.

How do you treat those "huge" rectifier sounds. How do you bring out the clarity and remove the hiss. How about compression? Since compression already takes place from the amps when the guitars are this overdriven, do you think there is still a need for compression in the mix?
ixnys is offline  
Old 23rd April 2004, 09:10 PM   #16
drew
Lives for gear
 
drew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Maryland,USA
Posts: 2,423
If I may say. I think you might be over thinking it. 90% of the sound is player, amp, mic and placement. To think about "treatments" sounds like band aids to me. Unless of course you're trying to salvage tracks that can't be re-recorded. I would focus on the front end first. Experiment with guitars, amps, and placement etc.
drew
drew is offline  
Old 24th April 2004, 07:47 AM   #17
drundall
Lives for gear
 
drundall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 758
Send a message via MSN to drundall
Quote:
Originally posted by Gie-Sound
Sometime I like the Fizz....
(call me nuts)
Lately I've been trying to add "fizz" in mixing...
__________________
Darian Rundall
drundall is online now  
Old 24th April 2004, 08:51 AM   #18
RhOdEz
Gear maniac
 
RhOdEz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: $%^f%$^%
Posts: 245
maybe using that old cassete deck which is collecting dust like "effect" insert on already DAW-ed guitars is nice idea (if nothing better is present -2 track,4 track whutever )
that fizz is mostly high freq metallic spiky transients and tape sets em "back" ,so overall freq balance seems to be more relaxed.
not enuff high freq detal after that ? No prob ,thats whut high shelf eq is for eh .
If there's no way to monitor tape sound from playback head ,maybe adding timing spike at the start of each section could speed up nudging that old-skooled track back where it should be .
playing bit with input level wouldnt hurt either ...
some synth sounds like this too


RhOdEz is offline  
Old 24th April 2004, 02:50 PM   #19
xyz
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5
After viewing my guitar tracks with a spectrum analyzer, I noticed some tiny peaks. One at 6k, 7k and around 10k. I used a very narrow, deep, cut at these frequencies and it definetly seems to help. Just wondering how everyone elese deals with this problem.
xyz is offline  
Old 24th April 2004, 05:36 PM   #20
Empty Planet
Lives for gear
 
Empty Planet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 728
Sometimes this crops up. High end nearly-white-noise fizz that is wrong for the sound and is impossible to address at the 5 or 6k where it resides without muffling the presence.

Of course, hopefully we don't ever record anything with this serious a flaw. But if this is what we're working with... Here's a tip from a mix engineer in Australia. He sat in on a session with a mastering engineer and brought back this pointer. When the mastering engineer ran across the same problem, he didn't address it where the main fizz seemed to be happening, he went a wee bit lower. He took a nice eq, dialed in a paper thin slice and fished around 4k. That did it. Whether this pushes down some illogically non-properly-divisible root tone of "fizz" or whatever the reason, this trick works.

Add this trick to your bag, and don't forget to buy any visiting Australian mix engineer's a pint.

Cheers.
Empty Planet is offline  
Old 24th April 2004, 06:16 PM   #21
cdog
Lives for gear
 
cdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 2,219
For distorted guitars I tend to highpass @ 100-300 hz and low pass @ 4-8 K, sometimes adding a wide, subtle lift in the 2-4K range. This will both help separate the bass from the guitar and also allow the vocals to sit above the guitars in the mix. Distorted guitars are already so compressed they rarely need treatment, but I do like a little small room reverb sometimes...
cdog is offline  
Old 24th April 2004, 08:11 PM   #22
stealthbalance
Lives for gear
 
stealthbalance's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: united states
Posts: 625
Quote:
Originally posted by xyz
After viewing my guitar tracks with a spectrum analyzer, I noticed some tiny peaks. One at 6k, 7k and around 10k. I used a very narrow, deep, cut at these frequencies and it definetly seems to help. Just wondering how everyone elese deals with this problem.
--------------------------------------------------------------
thats exactly what i do - except i dont use a spectral analizer. plugs that get stupid narrow for me are filterbank b1 , sony oxford ( in type 2 mode) , and the tc eq sat. sometimes you can carve out as much as 20 db and it will not deter the gtr sound. low pass for me wouldn't work. high pass on gtrs are an everyday thing.
s
stealthbalance is offline  
Old 25th April 2004, 12:26 AM   #23
Mike Jasper
Lives for gear
 
Mike Jasper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,335
Quote:
high pass on gtrs are an everyday thing.
Glad somebody brought that up.

Jasper
Mike Jasper is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0