Obstacle-Busting Work-Arounds For The Processor/System Challenged - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > Expert Question & Answer Archives (read only archive, not open for new posts) > Q&A with Charles Dye


Obstacle-Busting Work-Arounds For The Processor/System Challenged

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 7th April 2004   #1
Lives for gear
 
Curve Dominant's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Location: Control Room
Posts: 1,949

Thread Starter
Obstacle-Busting Work-Arounds For The Processor/System Challenged

Running Digi001 PTLE on an antiquated Mac 350Mhz G3 makes creating mixes that will compete with "pro" systems a CONSTANT excercise in improvising work-arounds.

Many if not most (or perhaps even all) of us have run into barriers imposed by the inherent limitations of our respective DAW systems.

But understand this: When you hit a wall, there's ALWAYS a way to get beyond it. Through it, around it, above, below it... Where there is a will, there is a way. And there is ALWAYS a f*cking way. So let us share the ways.

When you run out of:

> Processing power

> Track counts

> Time

> $$$

> Whatever else...

...and you STILL make it happen, how do you do it?
__________________
Eric Vincent
http://www.studioericvincent.com
Curve Dominant is offline  
Old 7th April 2004   #2
Lives for gear
 
Sofa King's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 600

Send a message via AIM to Sofa King
Re: Obstacle-Busting Work-Arounds For The Processor/System Challenged

Quote:
Originally posted by Curve Dominant
how do you do it?
These are obviously not some secret tips, but common sense things I'll do
If I hit "the wall".

Audiosuite, rendering and playlists.

For example, instead of the typical 4 or 5 versions of lead vocal tracks, each with its own 3 or 4 plugs.

If need be, Ill do 4 or 5 playlists, on one track.
Ill put up a dynamic/eq plug chain in real time, on the channel, get what I want, and "save as" on the plugs in question.

Then select the entire track on that particular playist, call up the same plug in Audiosuite, recall the "saved as" setting, and render that playlist.

and so on, until my 4 or 5 tracks/playlists are complete.


During the mix, ill toggle between the playlists choosing which "Track" i want at the that particular time, cobbling those pieces together, on fresh playlist.

Hopefully that made sense

It IS a pain in the ass, [ but you asked for work arounds],
but it has helped me when doing mixes in folks home studios.


best

Sean
__________________
Sean McDonald
Sofa King Music Services
Website
http://www.seanmcdonald.com
Facebook
http://www.facebook.com/SeanMcDonald...gMusicServices
Sofa King is offline  
Old 8th April 2004   #3
Gear addict
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 377

Also obvious but I often submix and print stuff I am happy with. If it was extensive then I will duplicate the session at that point leaving the old one with the fx/plugs intact so at any point I could go back make a change and import it to the current session.
__________________
Cheers
Brenton
Brenton is online now  
Old 8th April 2004   #4
Lives for gear
 
Curve Dominant's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Location: Control Room
Posts: 1,949

Thread Starter
The Playlists thing is something we need to explore. I've toyed with it, but I have to admit the whole concept of making playlists happen still goes over my head a bit at this point.

What's clear though, is that in order for us processor-challenged folks to compete with the big rigs, we must be willing to, unabashedly, and with glee:

• Print effects with Audiosuite
• Sum tracks (Bounce To Disk)...

...to the point of ping-ponging stereo mixes back and forth. Example:

I've gotten into a routine of developing tracks with minimal drums. Then when I need to enhance the drum/percussion/rhythm section, I'll ...

> Mute all the existing drum tracks in the session,
> Bounce To Disk a stereo file named SansDrums,
> Re-import that file into a new session
> Use the 22 remaining tracks to build a symphony of drum samples/loops/etc. around that arrangement, and when done,
> Mute the "SansDrums" stereo track on that session, and bounce that drum mix to disk with a tastefully applied compressor plugin on the mixbus, naming that file "DrmBounc1"...
> Import that drum mix back into the original session,
> Then mix to taste, adding whatever else is necessary.

The whole point is to emulate the mix structure of a large console IE: SSL, et al, while simultaneously utilizing the flexibility of the DAW to achieve what it physically cannot do in realtime.

Naturally, a lot of back-tracking is involved. You may bounce the drums and re-import them into your session, only to find the hihat is too loud or whatever, and then you're back into the drum mix session, tweaking.

But with "Save Session As," you can save each stage of each submix, and keep them all organized within the song file. As Sofa King so adequately put, it is a "pain in the ass." But if it's a labor of love, you can develop a system, time-consuming as it may be, which will ultimately yield some killer results.

Bob Olhsson has this great proverb:

"There is fast, there is good, and there is cheap...And you can only have two of those at once."

What we are discussing here falls into the realm of good and cheap. Not fast.
Curve Dominant is offline  
Old 8th April 2004   #5
Gear addict
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 377

Quote:
Originally posted by Curve Dominant


What we are discussing here falls into the realm of good and cheap. Not fast.
Well said!.

Still when I started, I did everything on an 8 track analog. Track drums and bass then mix and bounce down to two tracks and erase the originals. At least now we can go back to them when we realize the HiHat is too loud.
Brenton is online now  
Old 8th April 2004   #6
FX smörgåsbord user
 
Charles Dye's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Location: Hollywood, FL
Posts: 881

Quote:
Originally posted by Curve Dominant
"There is fast, there is good, and there is cheap...And you can only have two of those at once."
What's it mean when you only have one of them?
Charles Dye is offline  
Old 8th April 2004   #7
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 1,913

Send a message via AIM to Teacher
well when my computer can't handle anymore tracks, plugs or whatever i just push that magical function that samplitude has implemented in its latest incarnation which is the 'freeze function' its a god send. Logic, Nuendo(i think), do as well
__________________
"I hate it when they tell us how far we came to be, as if our people's history started with slavery...." Immortal Technique

www.sicbeats.com
Teacher is offline  
Old 8th April 2004   #8
Gear addict
 
Inner Light's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Location: Montreal
Posts: 326

Quote:
Originally posted by Teacher
well when my computer can't handle anymore tracks, plugs or whatever i just push that magical function that samplitude has implemented in its latest incarnation which is the 'freeze function' its a god send. Logic, Nuendo(i think), do as well
Tell me about it ! that freeze function has saved my ass many times !
Inner Light is offline  
Old 9th April 2004   #9
Lives for gear
 
Curve Dominant's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Location: Control Room
Posts: 1,949

Thread Starter
Quote:
posted by Charles:
quote:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Curve Dominant
"There is fast, there is good, and there is cheap...And you can only have two of those at once."
------------------------------------------------------------------------
What's it mean when you only have one of them?
Charles,

I give up.

What DOES that mean?
Curve Dominant is offline  
Old 9th April 2004   #10
Lives for gear
 
Renie's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 1,777

Hi Eric

Hope you don't mind a slight veer off topic.

I'm curious why you stay with PT LE and don't cross over to Logic (or other).

I personally wouldn't choose PT LE if I had to make an all-native choice.

Thanks

Rene
Renie is offline  
Old 9th April 2004   #11
Moderator
 
DrDeltaM's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,347

Reason to stick with PTLE is the plugin support. Most interesting native plugins come as RTAS but not as AU. I hope this will change tho as i use both PTLE and Logic myself, and would like to be able to use all plugins in both programs.
DrDeltaM is offline  
Old 9th April 2004   #12
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: St. Petersburg, Florida
Posts: 248

Send a message via AIM to superbee
Audio Suite

When processing a track with an audiosuite plugin, is there any latency? Do I need to nugde the track after the file is rendered?


Thanks!
Brian
superbee is offline  
Old 9th April 2004   #13
Moderator
 
DrDeltaM's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,347

No, there won't be any latency when you process a track with AS. You already gave your computer the opportinuty to take his time for the calculations during the processing. The resulting file will be spot on.
DrDeltaM is offline  
Old 9th April 2004   #14
Lives for gear
 
ProFool's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Location: BELGICA, THE FLANDERS, VENICE OF THE NORTH !
Posts: 996

what about recording the busses and AS these?
keep the drums in and instead of using the 2 stereo busses on them ful of plugins, just record them to stereo tracks and mute or delete the 2 busses. Audiosuite these to taste.
the current mix im working has 30 tracks and my cpu gets down when using +-10 plug ins, but have to work thru it to afford a new daw, so A real pain in the butt but it works.
__________________
Everybody knows that's what aliens sound like - Dr. Bob Moog
ProFool is offline  
Old 9th April 2004   #15
Lives for gear
 
Curve Dominant's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Location: Control Room
Posts: 1,949

Thread Starter
Quote:
Renie
Lives for gear

Registered: Jun 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 1121

Hi Eric

Hope you don't mind a slight veer off topic.

I'm curious why you stay with PT LE and don't cross over to Logic (or other).

I personally wouldn't choose PT LE if I had to make an all-native choice.

Thanks

Rene
Renie,

Interesting question. I wasn't aware there were so many advantages Logic/DP/et al might have over PT, besides track counts and MIDI support, neither of which is really burning me right now. But I guess it wouldn't hurt to have one of those programs in addition to PT.

There's lots of things about PT that I REALLY dig. So its limitations don't bug me. It's kinda fun actually, coming up with funky-assed ghetto workarounds in PTLE. I really love the sound I get with this stuff.

But if someone wants to send me a cracked version of Logic I'll be happy to try it out.
Curve Dominant is offline  
Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Determining need for PT HD2 system and Processor upgrade 4 the Max Music computers 0 18th November 2010 01:18 AM
A question for the remote truck guys... Axiomhead Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 19 29th April 2009 10:58 PM
lowest g4 processor that will work for a mix system HAWG_TRAIN Music computers 7 29th February 2008 04:41 AM
Has anyone found a work-around for the latency w/MBox2? Power Supply Music computers 10 10th September 2006 07:53 PM
Bang for the Buck EQ XHipHop Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 35 3rd April 2003 05:40 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:55 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.