Low Mids - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > Expert Question & Answer Archives (read only archive, not open for new posts) > Q & A with Butch Vig


Low Mids

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 15th June 2009   #1
Gear Head
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 43

Thread Starter
Low Mids

Hey Butch. Thanks for being a guest mod!

How do you deal with low mids (specifically guitar) during the producing/tracking/mixing process? The projects you have worked on are very clear but still have power especially in the low mids. I often find myself struggling to get a good guitar/low mid sound that is powerful and doesn't make the mix sound muddy. Do you have any thoughts, tips, tricks or suggestions?

Thanks again!
rishi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th June 2009   #2
Gearslutz.com admin
 
Jules's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Location: A Yank in London, UK
Posts: 17,808


I agree!.. V good with the low mids.

I have a theory that back when you were doing Garbage's 1st album you took the sometimes "choked sounding" Digidesign 888/24 converters and turned their tonal restriction around to work to your advantage - custom designing a 'new sound' to go with the technology.. Hence a very 'solid block' of mid range - that would seriously kick ass and make people move..

Anyway.. That might be totally wrong!

Carry on!
__________________
Jules

Add your reviews to the new reviews area!
Gearslutz on Facebook
Follow my GS picks on Twitter
Jules is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th June 2009   #3
Gear maniac
 
ButchVig's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 290

When I started working on the 1st Garbage album, I realized quickly that a lot of the songs were going to be very, very dense sounding, so I would do a lot of filtering as we built the songs. The board that we mixed on was a custom Harrison, and it had the most kick ass HP/LA filters! And I would take the filters and sweep them around on a guitar until it sounded like it had it's own "pocket" in the song. If you soloed the track, it sounded like s**t, but in the context of the mix, it sounded perfect.

I started doing a lot of eq filtering when we recorded Siamese Dream, as song of those tracks were also very very dense.
ButchVig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th June 2009   #4
Gear maniac
 
ButchVig's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 290

Jules...i like the "choked sounding" ref...I wish I could say it was a great idea I had!

In fact, the 1st Garbage album was done in a sort of lofi chain:

We recorded into a 24 track Otari MX80 (I think!) and almost all the tracks except for vocals were run through either an Akai S1000 sampler or Kurzweil K2500...then we mixed the whole thing through the Harrison w Flying Faders.

It wasn't until Garbage's V 2.0 that we jumped into Pro Tools!
ButchVig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th June 2009   #5
Gearslutz.com admin
 
Jules's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Location: A Yank in London, UK
Posts: 17,808


oops!



Perhaps it was the sampler frequency cut off that I mistook for the 888/24 sound..?



(grasping at straws now.. )
Jules is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th June 2009   #6
Gear maniac
 
ButchVig's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 290

5 minute drum sound

I also remember when we started Smart, we were doing records so quick that we didn't have time for working on a killer drum sound. so as soon as had the drums set up, I would listen to the drummer play for about a minute and adjust levels...then I would insert eq on all channels at once, which typically had some top boost around 5 or 6 K,
some bottom boost around 80 or 12o hz, and a big cut (-8 db) at 300-500 hz.
That was out 5 minute drum sound. The only channel that I would tinker with a bit more was the snare drum.
Steve Marker and I had that eq set up fro about 2 years. I think the board back then was an Allen and Heath. Most of the albums were done in 2 or 3 days. Record all the basics on day one, overdubs vocals and guitar solos day 2, mix day three.

Man oh man I did a lot of albums like that!
ButchVig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th June 2009   #7
3 + infractions, forum membership suspended.
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,071

Quote:
Originally Posted by ButchVig View Post

Man oh man I did a lot of albums like that!
Pretty cool!

I guess that type of way of working is a thing of the past. Do you think people spend too much time and money on albums these days? You had Green Day's new album done pretty quick! They entered and released before another act I like got halfway on their new album! 10 months already on production!

Was that to do with the downturn? Did GD hit the studio with everything ready to be recorded arrangement wise?
Chrislpp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th June 2009   #8
Lives for gear
 
doug hazelrigg's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,911

Quote:
Originally Posted by ButchVig View Post

It wasn't until Garbage's V 2.0 that we jumped into Pro Tools!
Wow -- that's surprising, given all the moves, edits, etc. that the first album seems to employ... I always assumed it was PT from the start
doug hazelrigg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th June 2009   #9
Lives for gear
 
Guitar Zero's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Location: Salem, OR
Posts: 1,301

Quote:
Originally Posted by ButchVig View Post
When I started working on the 1st Garbage album, I realized quickly that a lot of the songs were going to be very, very dense sounding, so I would do a lot of filtering as we built the songs. The board that we mixed on was a custom Harrison, and it had the most kick ass HP/LA filters! And I would take the filters and sweep them around on a guitar until it sounded like it had it's own "pocket" in the song. If you soloed the track, it sounded like s**t, but in the context of the mix, it sounded perfect.

I started doing a lot of eq filtering when we recorded Siamese Dream, as song of those tracks were also very very dense.
Thanks for taking the time to share your experience. When you high pass the guitars, what frequency? Or did it depend on the guitar track?
__________________
_____________________________________________
"For only 25 cents less, you could get the extra small".

http://project4music.com/

http://itunes.apple.com/us/album/project-4/id375600080
Guitar Zero is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 16th June 2009   #10
Lives for gear
 
chickencoop's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: Peekskill, NY
Posts: 750

Quote:
Originally Posted by ButchVig View Post
I also remember when we started Smart, we were doing records so quick that we didn't have time for working on a killer drum sound. so as soon as had the drums set up, I would listen to the drummer play for about a minute and adjust levels...then I would insert eq on all channels at once, which typically had some top boost around 5 or 6 K,
some bottom boost around 80 or 12o hz, and a big cut (-8 db) at 300-500 hz.
That was out 5 minute drum sound. The only channel that I would tinker with a bit more was the snare drum.
Steve Marker and I had that eq set up fro about 2 years. I think the board back then was an Allen and Heath. Most of the albums were done in 2 or 3 days. Record all the basics on day one, overdubs vocals and guitar solos day 2, mix day three.

Man oh man I did a lot of albums like that!
awesome-- free "Butch Vig presets"
chickencoop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th June 2009   #11
Gear Head
 
killersoundz's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Location: Canton, OH
Posts: 69

Quote:
Originally Posted by ButchVig View Post
then I would insert eq on all channels at once, which typically had some top boost around 5 or 6 K,
some bottom boost around 80 or 12o hz, and a big cut (-8 db) at 300-500 hz.
Hehe, loved seeing this. This is my basic go to EQ for drums as well.
__________________
If you're interested in an isolation cabinet check out the Dead Room Mark II!

Shoot me an e-mail if you have any questions and if you want info on the product check out the site.

I also assemble and sell speaker cables, microphone cables, and instrument cables.
killersoundz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th June 2009   #12
Lives for gear
 
jeremyglover's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: berlin
Posts: 1,122

We recorded into a 24 track Otari MX80 (I think!) and almost all the tracks except for vocals were run through either an Akai S1000 sampler or Kurzweil K2500...

to use the filters?

thanks,
jeremy
jeremyglover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th June 2009   #13
Gear nut
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 107

Quote:
Originally Posted by ButchVig View Post
I also remember when we started Smart, we were doing records so quick that we didn't have time for working on a killer drum sound. so as soon as had the drums set up, I would listen to the drummer play for about a minute and adjust levels...then I would insert eq on all channels at once, which typically had some top boost around 5 or 6 K,
some bottom boost around 80 or 12o hz, and a big cut (-8 db) at 300-500 hz.
That was out 5 minute drum sound. The only channel that I would tinker with a bit more was the snare drum.
Steve Marker and I had that eq set up fro about 2 years. I think the board back then was an Allen and Heath. Most of the albums were done in 2 or 3 days. Record all the basics on day one, overdubs vocals and guitar solos day 2, mix day three.

Man oh man I did a lot of albums like that!
Hi Butch,

Do you have any specific big albums in mind that you might have done that on that we might know? I guess as a reference point to what that sounded like. You mostly relied on having a great room then? For us without great rooms to record in, do you have any quick fix suggestions/tips that can take an ok room and keep it from interfering with the end result? sorry for the set of questions, thanks again!
kilroyrock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th June 2009   #14
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,136

Quote:
Originally Posted by ButchVig View Post
I also remember when we started Smart, we were doing records so quick that we didn't have time for working on a killer drum sound. so as soon as had the drums set up, I would listen to the drummer play for about a minute and adjust levels...then I would insert eq on all channels at once, which typically had some top boost around 5 or 6 K,
some bottom boost around 80 or 12o hz, and a big cut (-8 db) at 300-500 hz.
That was out 5 minute drum sound. The only channel that I would tinker with a bit more was the snare drum.
Steve Marker and I had that eq set up fro about 2 years. I think the board back then was an Allen and Heath. Most of the albums were done in 2 or 3 days. Record all the basics on day one, overdubs vocals and guitar solos day 2, mix day three.

Man oh man I did a lot of albums like that!
Wow... this is my fav post of the QA.

Not only did this show how much EQ you used (8db is a lot according to many posts online), but you kind of kept it the same for every single drummer!

BTW, thanks for doing this.
__________________

fooman is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Focal Solo6 Be's (too much low mids!!) Dopamine So much gear, so little time! 57 18th May 2011 07:14 AM
nearfield advice for the hi and low mids... dietrich10 Mastering forum 2 19th March 2009 05:52 PM
Low Mids snedley High end 1 6th April 2006 08:27 AM
Tips for keeping the low-mids clean? wallace So much gear, so little time! 4 1st March 2006 09:35 PM
No low mids in modern records faeflora So much gear, so little time! 60 12th January 2006 07:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:46 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.